Kodak Kodachrome 64 Slide Film

Pros: Very Accurate colors, very fine grain, neutral palette, good contrast.
Cons: The time it takes to get slides back from the lab.

Sadly for the legions of fans of KODACHROME 25, Kodak discontinued that venerable slide film in 2001 ...

Pros: Nearly invisible grain, vibrant colors, sharpness and contrast.
Cons: Slow compared to modern print films. Processing not as easy to come by.

Hard to believe, but at one time this ASA 64 slide film was known as "High Speed Kodachrome." That's because it was indeed twice as light-sensitive as its predecessor, Kodachrome 25. The two co-existed for a number of decades, but now reports are that...

Pros: Superlative for static pictures. No need for Neutral Density (ND) filters in sunny locales.
Cons: Use tripod for low light. Another body with a faster film is a good idea.

I have recently took my old Kodachrome 64 and Agfachrome (do not remember the ASA) slides out of storage. I took these slides about 20 years ago. The Kodachromes were pristine - and similar to my recently shot Elite Chromes, in the same locale. The Agfachromes were a muddybrown disaster.