-
-
Aug 20 '03
Pros: Very Accurate colors, very fine grain, neutral palette, good contrast.
Cons: The time it takes to get slides back from the lab.
Summary: Sadly for the legions of fans of KODACHROME 25, Kodak discontinued that venerable slide film in 2001 ...
-
-
Oct 19 '01
Pros: Nearly invisible grain, vibrant colors, sharpness and contrast.
Cons: Slow compared to modern print films. Processing not as easy to
come by.
Summary: Hard to believe, but at one time this ASA 64 slide film was known as "High Speed Kodachrome." That's because it was indeed twice as light-sensitive as its predecessor, Kodachrome 25. The two co-existed for a number of decades, but now reports are that...
-
- Express Reviews
-
Aug 08 '05
Pros: Superlative for static pictures. No need for Neutral Density (ND) filters in sunny locales.
Cons: Use tripod for low light. Another body with a faster film is a good idea.
Summary: I have recently took my old Kodachrome 64 and Agfachrome (do not remember the ASA) slides out of storage. I took these slides about 20 years ago. The Kodachromes were pristine - and similar to my recently shot Elite Chromes, in the same locale. The
|
|
