|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Re: Bad grade for you (Reply to this comment)
by boogacow
This Critique from someone who titled a review "Ford Taurus= boring and unpleasant, but hey- at least it drives"?
I would perhaps title your review something like "Kavikas= Boring and Unpleasant, bet hey, at least it's a review!"
|
Mar 16 '07
1:28 am PDT
|
|
Bad grade for you (Reply to this comment)
by kavikas
Your review was very poor and sloppy! You have some of the leading reviews, yet i fail to see anything in your reviews that really gives me critical information about the car, instead you talk more about other things related to the car.
Get better, or get out!
|
Mar 21 '04
12:24 am PST
|
|
Re: The rub - (Reply to this comment)
by mkaresh,  in Cars & Motorsports
This is the same engine used in the Montero, which went from 3.5 liters to 3.8 in 2003. I suppose it is also related to the 3.8 that will be available in the next Galant, though that engine is supposed to produce 230 horsepower.
|
Aug 21 '03
6:57 am PDT
|
|
The rub - (Reply to this comment)
by scmrak, in Cars & Motorsports
on the full-sized Montero (at least for 2002) was that the V6 required 90-octane fuel to achieve the nominal horsepower rating, and that was still unimpressive. Besides, it had only middling gas mileage. Then, too, the baroque styling (all those bulges on the body) caused it to look as though it needed liposuction...
I've been hearing sinister rumors about the zero-zero-zero financing arrangements, BTW.
Well done.
Rex
|
Aug 21 '03
6:28 am PDT
|
|
|
|
