|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
no problems with 5.8 GHz (Reply to this comment)
by ivanhoe77
Nice review. Exactly what I was looking for. The info about DSS was nice; a feature our current phone has, but I never appreciated the value. We've had a Panasonic 5.8 GHz phone for years.. well more than two anyway. We've never had any of the problems discussed here. It works across 3 floors, outside at least 200 feet from base. No background noise from/to DSL [3 mbs] wifi that I can detect - we don't use the filters. My sole issue is that I can't plug in a headset (I use my cell instead). We have the KX-TG4321, 5.8 GHz with two handsets. I've heard/read nothing but problems about the DECT phones. If/when a new phone becomes necessary, I'll look at the broadband or cable ones first.
|
Dec 23, 2010
10:07 pm PST
|
|
Re: Re: DECT phones are dangerous Health Hazzrd (Reply to this comment)
by tkeats
Keep in mind, a 24 hours a day, 365 days a year exposure on effects that are -less then- the affect of sitting in the sun for less then 8 hours a day, 7 days a week, might average to be worse.
Law of averages would apply I would imagine, having said that, its at the consumers discreation what they trust.
|
Sep 16, 2010
8:18 am PDT
|
|
Re: DECT phones are dangerous Health Hazzrd (Reply to this comment)
by smartgeek
If you read the data, closely, you will see that DECT is LESS harmful than the typical phone frequencies/technologies used in the US. And all are less dangerous than sitting in the sun.
|
Jul 27, 2010
7:04 pm PDT
|
|
DECT phones are dangerous Health Hazzrd (Reply to this comment)
by rvince
There are many sites stating that DECT phones are a health hazzard, affecting sleep, mood...etc. The phone constantly broadcasts emissions, even when not in use. Here is an alarming blurb from one of the sites listed at the end of this post:
The microwave signals from DECT phones and base cradles penetrate solid brick walls and flesh 24 hours a day, seven days a week whilst powered. As well as cordless phones, DECT is used by home hubs and some baby monitors.
Here are some sites and papers discussing it, they range from doctors that are absolutely certain that they pose risks, to agencies that can't be quite sure, but still list the possible risks and how to avoid them. Read on and make your own decision, but personally, I wouldn't get one. Better safe than sorry.
http://www.mastsanity.org/index.php?Itemid=142&id=58&option=com_content&task=view
http://weeksmd.com/?p=1066
http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/strahlung/00053/00673/00674/index.html?lang=en
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-515970/After-cancer-warnings-mobiles-home-phone-putting-health-danger.html
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/cordlessPhonesBrainTumours.php
http://www.mastsanity.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=58&Itemid=60
|
Dec 13, 2009
9:46 am PST
|
|
Re: Uniden TRU3485 cordless phone with answering machine (Reply to this comment)
by FridayFriday
Wow - sorry for the delay in checking this review for questions! Interference is almost always the cause of poor quality cordless phone transmissions - assuming the hardware itself is working.
With the great proliferation of Wireless B and G networks for computers, it is very likely that your neighbourhood is crowded with other devices on the same frequencies. If you are hearing constant and repetitive noise, my guess is someone's wireless router is nearby.
Other problems might come from other cordless phones nearby, a microwave that 'leaks' (uses the same frequency as you phone), or some other malfunctioning device. Your proximity to radio towers, cell towers, and power lines can all factor in.
To truly find the source of the interference requires special hardware that most phone companies don't have. The best thing is to isolate the problem - take your phone to a buddies place and see if it does the same thing. If so, it might be the phone. If not, then experiment with placement of the base station in your house and see if something in your own home is causing the problem. Don't forget to use a DSL filter on your phone if you've got ADSL internet coming into your house.
Even though these phones all live in the same frequency band, some will do better are ignoring interference than others. Buy your phone from a no-hassle store, so you can find one that works best in your home.
|
Jan 20, 2006
7:13 pm PST
|
|
Uniden TRU3485 cordless phone with answering machine (Reply to this comment)
by lnawaradedham
We have purchased 2 Uniden TRU3485 cordless phones after high recommendation from Consumer Report. We have constant problems with static and disruptions, even after phone company has checked the line, and we have new jack. Our cheap cord phone works fine in the same jack. At this point, we don't think the problem is the quality of the phone, but want your expertise as to what could cause the problem. Thanks
|
Nov 5, 2001
7:20 pm PST
|
|
Exactly what I was looking for... (Reply to this comment)
by marcman
That was exactly what I was looking for. An unbiased description of 2.4 GHz vs. 900 MHz. I was wondering if 2.4 GHz was really worth it or just hype and now I'm thinking that 900 MHz DSS is a much better and cost-effective way to go.
Thanks for a great article!
|
Jul 18, 2001
11:26 am PDT
|
|
Thanks, I Needed That (Reply to this comment)
by johnshepler
Excellent discussion on a very pertinent topic. I often get confused by the myriad of cordless phones on display...many for $50 or less. I suspected that DSS had advantages beyond security and you confirmed it. Thanks again,
John
|
Apr 8, 2001
9:09 pm PDT
|
|
|
|
