|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Re: Re: Re: Details, details. (Reply to this comment)
by theuerkorn
Thanks a lot.
- Thomas
|
Mar 21 '04
7:42 pm PST
|
|
Re: Re: Details, details. (Reply to this comment)
by ivplay,  in Computer Hardware
Changed the rating! Thanks,
Jason
|
Mar 21 '04
2:06 pm PST
|
|
Re: ... (Reply to this comment)
by theuerkorn
I don't have a USB 2.0 reader but judging from the specs I suspect that it should be right around 6MByte/sec since Lexar points out that WA does not gain improvements when transferring back to the computer. (Wasn't clear to me if that only applies to USB 1.1 or includes USB 2.0)
Regarding the 256kB, I guess I had a flashback to 1985 and waiting for the first 1MByte to emerge. ;-)
Sorry for the confusion.
|
Mar 21 '04
10:54 am PST
|
|
Re: Details, details. (Reply to this comment)
by theuerkorn
You're right. I must have been asleep when I wrote this. At least I was consitently wrong ;-). Anyway I updated, thanks for checking.
- Thomas
|
Mar 21 '04
10:38 am PST
|
|
... (Reply to this comment)
by nc10
I chose the Lexar 40X 256kB and here is why
256kB matches the title of your review (256,000 bytes and I need more), though strictly speaking, 256 kb would be 262,144 bytes.
But, don't you mean 256MB?
I'd think your readers would be interested in reading how fast one can really download from a USB 2 capable reader, real world experience....
|
Mar 21 '04
10:11 am PST
|
|
Details, details. (Reply to this comment)
by ivplay, in Computer Hardware
I am pretty sure that the card that you bought is a 256MB card, not a 256kB card, and therefore it has more than 256,000 bytes as your title suggests... 256kB card would not support even one 6MP picture.
Other than that, the information was good. One question; does this card have write protection tab so that you can be sure not to overwrite what is on the card? If you change the info to represent the data size of the card correctly, I would come back and rerate to very helpful!
Jason
|
Mar 21 '04
10:11 am PST
|
|
|
|
