|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Reviewer clearly not used to high-end (Reply to this comment)
by jenwil
With the amount you paid for this room, it seems as though you hardly have the right to complain as you did. Many large cities you would be staying at a barely 3 star hotel for $159.
With that said, the fact that you would even consider staying at the Venetian or the Venetian being in the same league as the Wynn shows your lack of knowledge of world class hotels.
When it comes to staying at a hotel like this (and maybe this is the one thing that is sad but true) is that you cannot stay in the cheapest room on a "deal" and expect the best of service. When it comes down to that you are just a number to them and if you often complain how you did on here you are better off just staying in a cheaper hotel, so you can be the "big shot" and have your ego stroked.
I have stayed at the Wynn two times and am going back my 3rd time about a month from now and am looking forward to it. My advice would be to get a tower suites room (even the basic room) so you have access to their pool and restaurant.
I also need to mention that it is a great location for the nearby convention center that many events are held at.
|
Apr 28 '08
1:40 pm PDT
|
|
BEST HOTEL IN VEGAS! (Reply to this comment)
by stoopidgerl
Wynn is by far the greatest hotel on the Strip. I have stayed at several other hotels on the Strip and the Wynn blows them all away. The room was amazing. We asked for a high floor, strip view room and the man at the front desk gave us a room on the top floor (60th) with the most amazing panoramic view.
The resort room we got was amazing. Big cozy bed, the bathroom was enormous, and the HDTV = sweet! It even swiveled so you could watch it from the couch or the bed. Housekeeping did an excellent job with service twice daily and the turndown service was a nice added bonus!
The elevators were speedy.
The pool was relaxing and not full of obnoxious kids.
The hotel property is nicely kept- it's immaculate. Fresh flowers are always being arranged and windows being wiped clean.
The casino was AWESOME! Spun 1000 on the Wheel of Fortune on my wedding night.
AND THE DINNER BUFFET IS THE BEST OF VEGAS! The crab legs were HUGE - about 16-18 inches long and they were cut in half for easy removal of the the crabmeat. Desserts were a work of art! Try the coconut ice-cream... best ice-cream EVER.
***I can't come up with ANY complaints about the Wynn!***
We even got married there in the middle of our trip (we had been planning it for 6 months). The wedding salons there do a fabulous job. They are very attentive and there for your every need.
I will probably never stay at another hotel... except maybe for Encore when that opens up.
Excellent job, Steve Wynn!
|
Jul 26 '07
5:56 pm PDT
|
|
great and accurate review readers should pay attention (Reply to this comment)
by adelbaba
Admired the excellent and lengthy review. I was and am a gourmet BUFFET addict, deriving great pleasure from upscale vegas buffets, of which there are several, so the article/review appealed to me.
I stayed at the Wynn Hotel in late 2005, but notwithstanding the fact that the hotel was less than a year old at that point, I suspect my displeasure regarding their buffet and hotel/room/physical plant wouldn't be any different today.
The BUFFET: based upon what I would suggest is more than enough personal buffet dining in Tahoe and Vegas (Lake Tahoe was actually the initiator of gourmet/good buffets, not Vegas. I used to go with my parents as a teenager in the late 60's, than on my own in the 70's, to the Sahara Tahoe (not called that anymore, but next to Harveys) and it was high end food. Duckling with bing cherries!, and lobster tails, and food that was an introduction to fancy eating. Later, Harrahs added a fancy upscale buffet, also great. Caesars Tahoe came later and although nice hotel, not a great buffet. Harveys had great beef on the buffet due to owners background, but not a fancy buffet.
But that is Tahoe history. Vegas had crap buffets other than Sunday Brunch at Ballys, at least to my knowledge, until Steve Wynn took over the Golden Nugget and changed buffet quality in the town. He is a genius and admired by myself and many others for creativity/style/brillance. After Golden Nugget, and after Mirage and Treasure Island, Bellagio was his crowning achievement (and still is despite Wynn's opening),
Stayed there several times (I have stayed at many properties in Vegas over the years, sometimes preferring small properties when visiting alone) and Bellagio remains the best. The buffet at Bellagio was simply put, groundbreaking design and quality execution. It copied nothing, had separate stations, a bar that diners could eat at if alone (which is my preferred method of visiting the Bellagio buffet) and the quality during Steve Wynn's leadership and control did not dimenish following takeover by MGM Grand, a true credit to a company that, in all fairness, doesn't hold a candle to Wynn's company in terms of employee loyalty and quality standards. For goodness sakes, look at the MGM Grand's namesake, it's a lousy place.
The sad part is that Wynn's hotel isn't enjoyable as compared to Bellagio and Caesars Palace, the interior decor of the casino and lobby is off-putting for reasons that are hard to explain but a visitor simply feels a much lower sense of excitement and joy at entering Wynn's vs. Bellagio. The guest rooms at Wynn's are as described in the main review, but my biggest problem was not mentioned there, but was having noise problems from adjoining rooms TWICE in one stay, after changing rooms to fix the problem. Something very foolish happened with wall noise reduction; it stinks. very bad problem in my opinion.
The Buffet at Wynns', of which I visited once and am not likely to revisit since I would hate to miss a great buffet visit elswhere by being disspointed agains with Wynn's buffet, was as follows:
1. seating was way too tight, tables too close together and movement restricted and not enjoyable.
2. ASSISTED SERVING: I prefer to "design" my plate at a gourmet buffet by taking very very small servings of almost every interesting dish, then trying the "tasting" and going back later for my winners. Maybe some persons prefer the atmosphere of less being at a buffet, more at an elegant "function", hence there being assisted service. At Wynn's, due to having assisted servings and not always serving yourself, I am not having exactly what I want. I admit to being picky about what I eat, I don't like peppers or alot of onions, so I select my food with personal bias. Wynn's takes that option away or requires excessive verbal request to serve it "my way".
Overall I didn't find Wynn's buffet that great in terms of taste, quality, or vastness of selection. And this was so surprising since it was obvious that Steve Wynn, in many ways, invented the Vegas gourmet buffet.
3: Frankly anybody who thinks that Wynn's dessert area is the best or most desirble surprises me. Perhaps it depends on whether ice cream/gelato is a diner's perception of perfect dessert at a buffet. It is not my perception, I can buy ice cream/gelato anywere, but I cannot get wonderful samplers of upscale desserts/tarts/napoleons/mousses, etc. most places, but I can at Bellagio and several other buffets. Wynn's desserts actually are a strong negative conclusion to my dining at gourmet buffets.
Those are my thoughts, hope you found them interesting. Again, I thought the main review was amazingly detailed and excellent. I forgot to mention that I agree that the pool areas are very pretty but really are not as likeable as other Strip pool areas.
lastly, for the many who don't know about one f the most luxurious hotels in Vegas, but very low key and way off the strip, go visit the J.W. Marriott Resort in Summerlin (sp). Has a quality buffet, incredible public areas and pool and gardens, very low level of tourists and crowding, etc. Very different Vegas experience.
|
Oct 21 '06
10:08 am PDT
|
|
great and accurate review readers should pay attention (Reply to this comment)
by adelbaba
Admired the excellent and lengthy review. I was and am a gourmet BUFFET addict, deriving great pleasure from upscale vegas buffets, of which there are several, so the article/review appealed to me.
I stayed at the Wynn Hotel in late 2005, but notwithstanding the fact that the hotel was less than a year old at that point, I suspect my displeasure regarding their buffet and hotel/room/physical plant wouldn't be any different today.
The BUFFET: based upon what I would suggest is more than enough personal buffet dining in Tahoe and Vegas (Lake Tahoe was actually the initiator of gourmet/good buffets, not Vegas. I used to go with my parents as a teenager in the late 60's, than on my own in the 70's, to the Sahara Tahoe (not called that anymore, but next to Harveys) and it was high end food. Duckling with bing cherries!, and lobster tails, and food that was an introduction to fancy eating. Later, Harrahs added a fancy upscale buffet, also great. Caesars Tahoe came later and although nice hotel, not a great buffet. Harveys had great beef on the buffet due to owners background, but not a fancy buffet.
But that is Tahoe history. Vegas had crap buffets other than Sunday Brunch at Ballys, at least to my knowledge, until Steve Wynn took over the Golden Nugget and changed buffet quality in the town. He is a genius and admired by myself and many others for creativity/style/brillance. After Golden Nugget, and after Mirage and Treasure Island, Bellagio was his crowning achievement (and still is despite Wynn's opening),
Stayed there several times (I have stayed at many properties in Vegas over the years, sometimes preferring small properties when visiting alone) and Bellagio remains the best. The buffet at Bellagio was simply put, groundbreaking design and quality execution. It copied nothing, had separate stations, a bar that diners could eat at if alone (which is my preferred method of visiting the Bellagio buffet) and the quality during Steve Wynn's leadership and control did not dimenish following takeover by MGM Grand, a true credit to a company that, in all fairness, doesn't hold a candle to Wynn's company in terms of employee loyalty and quality standards. For goodness sakes, look at the MGM Grand's namesake, it's a lousy place.
The sad part is that Wynn's hotel isn't enjoyable as compared to Bellagio and Caesars Palace, the interior decor of the casino and lobby is off-putting for reasons that are hard to explain but a visitor simply feels a much lower sense of excitement and joy at entering Wynn's vs. Bellagio. The guest rooms at Wynn's are as described in the main review, but my biggest problem was not mentioned there, but was having noise problems from adjoining rooms TWICE in one stay, after changing rooms to fix the problem. Something very foolish happened with wall noise reduction; it stinks. very bad problem in my opinion.
The Buffet at Wynns', of which I visited once and am not likely to revisit since I would hate to miss a great buffet visit elswhere by being disspointed agains with Wynn's buffet, was as follows:
1. seating was way too tight, tables too close together and movement restricted and not enjoyable.
2. ASSISTED SERVING: I prefer to "design" my plate at a gourmet buffet by taking very very small servings of almost every interesting dish, then trying the "tasting" and going back later for my winners. Maybe some persons prefer the atmosphere of less being at a buffet, more at an elegant "function", hence there being assisted service. At Wynn's, due to having assisted servings and not always serving yourself, I am not having exactly what I want. I admit to being picky about what I eat, I don't like peppers or alot of onions, so I select my food with personal bias. Wynn's takes that option away or requires excessive verbal request to serve it "my way".
Overall I didn't find Wynn's buffet that great in terms of taste, quality, or vastness of selection. And this was so surprising since it was obvious that Steve Wynn, in many ways, invented the Vegas gourmet buffet.
3: Frankly anybody who thinks that Wynn's dessert area is the best or most desirble surprises me. Perhaps it depends on whether ice cream/gelato is a diner's perception of perfect dessert at a buffet. It is not my perception, I can buy ice cream/gelato anywere, but I cannot get wonderful samplers of upscale desserts/tarts/napoleons/mousses, etc. most places, but I can at Bellagio and several other buffets. Wynn's desserts actually are a strong negative conclusion to my dining at gourmet buffets.
Those are my thoughts, hope you found them interesting. Again, I thought the main review was amazingly detailed and excellent. I forgot to mention that I agree that the pool areas are very pretty but really are not as likeable as other Strip pool areas.
lastly, for the many who don't know about one f the most luxurious hotels in Vegas, but very low key and way off the strip, go visit the J.W. Marriott Resort in Summerlin (sp). Has a quality buffet, incredible public areas and pool and gardens, very low level of tourists and crowding, etc. Very different Vegas experience.
|
Oct 21 '06
10:08 am PDT
|
|
great and accurate review readers should pay attention (Reply to this comment)
by adelbaba
Admired the excellent and lengthy review. I was and am a gourmet BUFFET addict, deriving great pleasure from upscale vegas buffets, of which there are several, so the article/review appealed to me.
I stayed at the Wynn Hotel in late 2005, but notwithstanding the fact that the hotel was less than a year old at that point, I suspect my displeasure regarding their buffet and hotel/room/physical plant wouldn't be any different today.
The BUFFET: based upon what I would suggest is more than enough personal buffet dining in Tahoe and Vegas (Lake Tahoe was actually the initiator of gourmet/good buffets, not Vegas. I used to go with my parents as a teenager in the late 60's, than on my own in the 70's, to the Sahara Tahoe (not called that anymore, but next to Harveys) and it was high end food. Duckling with bing cherries!, and lobster tails, and food that was an introduction to fancy eating. Later, Harrahs added a fancy upscale buffet, also great. Caesars Tahoe came later and although nice hotel, not a great buffet. Harveys had great beef on the buffet due to owners background, but not a fancy buffet.
But that is Tahoe history. Vegas had crap buffets other than Sunday Brunch at Ballys, at least to my knowledge, until Steve Wynn took over the Golden Nugget and changed buffet quality in the town. He is a genius and admired by myself and many others for creativity/style/brillance. After Golden Nugget, and after Mirage and Treasure Island, Bellagio was his crowning achievement (and still is despite Wynn's opening),
Stayed there several times (I have stayed at many properties in Vegas over the years, sometimes preferring small properties when visiting alone) and Bellagio remains the best. The buffet at Bellagio was simply put, groundbreaking design and quality execution. It copied nothing, had separate stations, a bar that diners could eat at if alone (which is my preferred method of visiting the Bellagio buffet) and the quality during Steve Wynn's leadership and control did not dimenish following takeover by MGM Grand, a true credit to a company that, in all fairness, doesn't hold a candle to Wynn's company in terms of employee loyalty and quality standards. For goodness sakes, look at the MGM Grand's namesake, it's a lousy place.
The sad part is that Wynn's hotel isn't enjoyable as compared to Bellagio and Caesars Palace, the interior decor of the casino and lobby is off-putting for reasons that are hard to explain but a visitor simply feels a much lower sense of excitement and joy at entering Wynn's vs. Bellagio. The guest rooms at Wynn's are as described in the main review, but my biggest problem was not mentioned there, but was having noise problems from adjoining rooms TWICE in one stay, after changing rooms to fix the problem. Something very foolish happened with wall noise reduction; it stinks. very bad problem in my opinion.
The Buffet at Wynns', of which I visited once and am not likely to revisit since I would hate to miss a great buffet visit elswhere by being disspointed agains with Wynn's buffet, was as follows:
1. seating was way too tight, tables too close together and movement restricted and not enjoyable.
2. ASSISTED SERVING: I prefer to "design" my plate at a gourmet buffet by taking very very small servings of almost every interesting dish, then trying the "tasting" and going back later for my winners. Maybe some persons prefer the atmosphere of less being at a buffet, more at an elegant "function", hence there being assisted service. At Wynn's, due to having assisted servings and not always serving yourself, I am not having exactly what I want. I admit to being picky about what I eat, I don't like peppers or alot of onions, so I select my food with personal bias. Wynn's takes that option away or requires excessive verbal request to serve it "my way".
Overall I didn't find Wynn's buffet that great in terms of taste, quality, or vastness of selection. And this was so surprising since it was obvious that Steve Wynn, in many ways, invented the Vegas gourmet buffet.
3: Frankly anybody who thinks that Wynn's dessert area is the best or most desirble surprises me. Perhaps it depends on whether ice cream/gelato is a diner's perception of perfect dessert at a buffet. It is not my perception, I can buy ice cream/gelato anywere, but I cannot get wonderful samplers of upscale desserts/tarts/napoleons/mousses, etc. most places, but I can at Bellagio and several other buffets. Wynn's desserts actually are a strong negative conclusion to my dining at gourmet buffets.
Those are my thoughts, hope you found them interesting. Again, I thought the main review was amazingly detailed and excellent. I forgot to mention that I agree that the pool areas are very pretty but really are not as likeable as other Strip pool areas.
lastly, for the many who don't know about one f the most luxurious hotels in Vegas, but very low key and way off the strip, go visit the J.W. Marriott Resort in Summerlin (sp). Has a quality buffet, incredible public areas and pool and gardens, very low level of tourists and crowding, etc. Very different Vegas experience.
|
Oct 21 '06
10:08 am PDT
|
|
great and accurate review readers should pay attention (Reply to this comment)
by adelbaba
Admired the excellent and lengthy review. I was and am a gourmet BUFFET addict, deriving great pleasure from upscale vegas buffets, of which there are several, so the article/review appealed to me.
I stayed at the Wynn Hotel in late 2005, but notwithstanding the fact that the hotel was less than a year old at that point, I suspect my displeasure regarding their buffet and hotel/room/physical plant wouldn't be any different today.
The BUFFET: based upon what I would suggest is more than enough personal buffet dining in Tahoe and Vegas (Lake Tahoe was actually the initiator of gourmet/good buffets, not Vegas. I used to go with my parents as a teenager in the late 60's, than on my own in the 70's, to the Sahara Tahoe (not called that anymore, but next to Harveys) and it was high end food. Duckling with bing cherries!, and lobster tails, and food that was an introduction to fancy eating. Later, Harrahs added a fancy upscale buffet, also great. Caesars Tahoe came later and although nice hotel, not a great buffet. Harveys had great beef on the buffet due to owners background, but not a fancy buffet.
But that is Tahoe history. Vegas had crap buffets other than Sunday Brunch at Ballys, at least to my knowledge, until Steve Wynn took over the Golden Nugget and changed buffet quality in the town. He is a genius and admired by myself and many others for creativity/style/brillance. After Golden Nugget, and after Mirage and Treasure Island, Bellagio was his crowning achievement (and still is despite Wynn's opening),
Stayed there several times (I have stayed at many properties in Vegas over the years, sometimes preferring small properties when visiting alone) and Bellagio remains the best. The buffet at Bellagio was simply put, groundbreaking design and quality execution. It copied nothing, had separate stations, a bar that diners could eat at if alone (which is my preferred method of visiting the Bellagio buffet) and the quality during Steve Wynn's leadership and control did not dimenish following takeover by MGM Grand, a true credit to a company that, in all fairness, doesn't hold a candle to Wynn's company in terms of employee loyalty and quality standards. For goodness sakes, look at the MGM Grand's namesake, it's a lousy place.
The sad part is that Wynn's hotel isn't enjoyable as compared to Bellagio and Caesars Palace, the interior decor of the casino and lobby is off-putting for reasons that are hard to explain but a visitor simply feels a much lower sense of excitement and joy at entering Wynn's vs. Bellagio. The guest rooms at Wynn's are as described in the main review, but my biggest problem was not mentioned there, but was having noise problems from adjoining rooms TWICE in one stay, after changing rooms to fix the problem. Something very foolish happened with wall noise reduction; it stinks. very bad problem in my opinion.
The Buffet at Wynns', of which I visited once and am not likely to revisit since I would hate to miss a great buffet visit elswhere by being disspointed agains with Wynn's buffet, was as follows:
1. seating was way too tight, tables too close together and movement restricted and not enjoyable.
2. ASSISTED SERVING: I prefer to "design" my plate at a gourmet buffet by taking very very small servings of almost every interesting dish, then trying the "tasting" and going back later for my winners. Maybe some persons prefer the atmosphere of less being at a buffet, more at an elegant "function", hence there being assisted service. At Wynn's, due to having assisted servings and not always serving yourself, I am not having exactly what I want. I admit to being picky about what I eat, I don't like peppers or alot of onions, so I select my food with personal bias. Wynn's takes that option away or requires excessive verbal request to serve it "my way".
Overall I didn't find Wynn's buffet that great in terms of taste, quality, or vastness of selection. And this was so surprising since it was obvious that Steve Wynn, in many ways, invented the Vegas gourmet buffet.
3: Frankly anybody who thinks that Wynn's dessert area is the best or most desirble surprises me. Perhaps it depends on whether ice cream/gelato is a diner's perception of perfect dessert at a buffet. It is not my perception, I can buy ice cream/gelato anywere, but I cannot get wonderful samplers of upscale desserts/tarts/napoleons/mousses, etc. most places, but I can at Bellagio and several other buffets. Wynn's desserts actually are a strong negative conclusion to my dining at gourmet buffets.
Those are my thoughts, hope you found them interesting. Again, I thought the main review was amazingly detailed and excellent. I forgot to mention that I agree that the pool areas are very pretty but really are not as likeable as other Strip pool areas.
lastly, for the many who don't know about one f the most luxurious hotels in Vegas, but very low key and way off the strip, go visit the J.W. Marriott Resort in Summerlin (sp). Has a quality buffet, incredible public areas and pool and gardens, very low level of tourists and crowding, etc. Very different Vegas experience.
|
Oct 21 '06
10:05 am PDT
|
|
Wynn . . . ad infinitum (Reply to this comment)
by budbud
I concur to some extent. I think everyone that's visited Wynn so far agrees that it is somewhat of a disappointment (it doesn't even make my Top 5 Strip resorts . . . falling behind Bellagio, Paris, Mandalay Bay, Caesar's and Venetian) . . . but it is important to state, I believe, that it is not a bad resort! I still enjoy it; there is much to like. I've concluded that there was just way too much pre-opening hype to meet our expectations. We Vegasphiles are a fussy class . . . . ;-)
|
Feb 06 '06
7:32 am PST
|
|
Re: Well Written But I Disagree (Reply to this comment)
by Pisces
About Steve Wynn's smoking:
In the Wynn Magazine (the magazine found in every guestroom).....there's an article on Steve Wynn, which talks about his smoking a pipe.
Again, this was the Wynn Magazine (Holiday Edition). I have no reason to doubt a story put out by their very own magazine.
However, if he's stopped smoking since then---that's great!
|
Feb 05 '06
3:23 pm PST
|
|
Well Written But I Disagree (Reply to this comment)
by ratevegas
This was interesting to read as a well-written report.
I've stayed at Wynn 5 times and I disagree on almost all points.
Plus, there are a couple of inaccuracies (Wynn doesn't smoke, etc...) in the review.
Anyway, we're discussing this over on my blog where one of my readers wrote a long rebuttal:
http://www.ratevegas.com/blog/2006/02/strong_opinions.html
|
Feb 04 '06
7:06 pm PST
|
|
Thank you (Reply to this comment)
by nliedel
I have to say after all I have read, many reviews, I am not interested in a visit to Wynn. Your review clinched it.
|
Feb 04 '06
4:26 am PST
|
|
you make a lot of good points... (Reply to this comment)
by dad-daughters
...and even though we had a good experience (but frankly, maybe I am way too forgiving for the noise that kept us up all night) we are already talking about going to Bellagio next time for all the reasons you gave. We have not stayed at Caesars in the last 10 years, and we might try the new tower out. I totally agree that it seems hard to believe that 2.7 billion was spent and that was the best all that money could buy. Regards
|
Jan 25 '06
10:17 pm PST
|
|
Re: Re: Detailed review . . . (Reply to this comment)
by ifif1938
I thought this review was very through and if I were to think of staying at the Wynn, I would definitely think twice..Ovwer the course of quite a few years we've been to Vegas dozens of times, either for entertainment or conventions, we've stayed at quite a few hotels and love to compare them as you did here..Thanks so much.
Oh, by the way, I went to high school with Steve Wynns wife Elaine..I wish I could get a discount then I might stay there...LOL
Cheers'Barbara
|
Jan 15 '06
9:19 am PST
|
|
You are clearly... (Reply to this comment)
by chelledun,  in Hotels & Travel
very knowledgeable about the area. The comparisons to other hotels in the area were very helpful to me. We're hoping to head to Vegas next year and I will head back to read this again when we start making plans.
Michelle
|
Jan 13 '06
2:53 pm PST
|
|
Re: Detailed review . . . (Reply to this comment)
by Pisces
I absolutely don't work in the hotel industry. I don't live in Las Vegas. I don't believe my expectations are unreasonable........for a luxury hotel, in Las Vegas. And, as it turns out there are luxury hotels, namely Caesars and Bellagio that go much further in providing amenities for their guests. I don't work for Caesars, I don't work for Bellagio. I've simply stayed at Caesars and Bellagio countless times, and seen the level of luxury they provide.
We aren't talking about New York Hotels, which would be a whole different kettle of fish.
We are talking about reasonable expectations in terms of Las Vegas Luxury Hotels.
And, simply just the basic promise of Wynn. Wynn is billing itself as the greatest luxury hotel in Las Vegas, ever. Well, I don't feel they fulfilled that promise when you compare them to other, luxury hotels in that same city.....that actually had lower rates, and go much further in terms of quality amenities/furnishings!
|
Jan 13 '06
1:58 pm PST
|
|
Detailed review . . . (Reply to this comment)
by modernmarvel
but you come off as very fussy. The tub was deep but no arm rests? The humidifier was not the top brand? The TV didn't pivot right? It seems you are really digging for things to be wrong with the hotel. I recently stayed at the Wynn and loved it. Sure, it is expensive, but being from the East Coast, it was still much cheaper than rooms in, say, NYC.
Also, a lot of hotels have trendy styles and I thought everything was either trendy or theme-y in Vegas. It may not be your taste but I thought the room was put together well.
All in all, you had a very detailed review and your writing is good. But I agree with the previous comment - do you work for a
competitor?
|
Jan 13 '06
1:37 pm PST
|
|
Wow... (Reply to this comment)
by three_ster
That was a very in-depth review! You must work for one of their competitors ;) Just Kidding.
--RYan (three_ster)
|
Jan 13 '06
1:13 pm PST
|
|
|
|
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.