motorola isn't the best
Written: May 17 '01
|
Product Rating:
|
|
| Durability: |
 |
|
| Clarity: |
 |
|
| Portability: |
|
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
|
Pros: good sleak looking, light, small portable.
Cons: low battery life, breaks easily, inconvience with the antana, high priced, low reception. no timer.
The Bottom Line: Why spend so much money on such a bad cell phone? these are the reasons why, please take a look.
|
|
|
| twbabyboi's Full Review: Motorola StarTAC ST7760 CDMA / AMPS Cellular Phone |
Althought a lot of American consumers know motorola, other people from asia and europe aren't as really familiar with it. You want to know why right? well heres why, even though the cell phone may look good, light and portable, It has low battery life, and it will be broken if you accidently droped it. Just think, oh geez, i have just bought a 200 dollar phone, and i droped it. Won't you be mad? well thats not the worst of Motorola. Motorola doesn't have a timer like other cell phones do. THe antana is really inconvience because you have to pull it out every time you use it. Also the worst thing that people may say is that it has low reception. Now do you really want to buy a phone that has all these problems at such a high price? When you can just buy a nokia or a erricson. Think wisely please
Recommended:
No
Amount Paid (US$): 200
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID:
twbabyboi
|
|
Reviews written: 17
Trusted by: 1 member
|
|
|
- Add to My Yahoo!: 
- Add to Google Homepage: 
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.