"Better than Winzip, if you aren't concerned with sharing your data with the public."commentsRarsoft WinRAR
Opinion Summary
Better than Winzip, if you aren't concerned with sharing your data with the public.
by grimjack2 | Jun 04 '01
Pros: Better than Winzip in almost every way.
Cons: Uses a non-standard compression routine making it worthless for many.

Return to opinion


OVERALL RATING
Product Rating: 5.0



Have something to say?
Write your own comment on this review!
Comments on Better than Winzip, if you aren't concerned with sharing your data with the public." (1 total)  
  Comment Sorted by
Date Written
great review as usual, one quibble (Reply to this comment)
by benho
", I cannot compress a .ZIP file any further. Mathematically, I would think it could, but once a file is zipped a certain way, even Zip cannot take it down any further"

I wouldn't expect multiple zippings to do much better in terms of compression. I remember, way back when, before RAR, in the days of compress, ARJ, ARC, LHZ (or something like that), etc, I used to experiment with using different compressions, and multiple times, and no matter what happened, variations were rarely more than 1%.

Later, I realize that this makes sense, that Huffman coding basically compresses to the theoretical limits anyway (unless you cheat, and know that it's a .WAV or something), and that Mathematically, It makes sense that additional compressions don't help, given how little information per byte there is left (ala Shanon's Theorem).
Jun 05 '01
2:20 pm PDT