Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Learn More! | Sign In   

HomeMember CenterWriter's Corner: Language Non-Fiction

Read Advice   Write an essay on this topic. 

There's no Their They're -- Fun With Homonyms from the Grammar Curmudgeon

Jan 07 '03 (Updated Feb 06 '03)

The Bottom Line Don't depend on a spell checker to choose the right word for you. Proofread, too!

MY SPELL CHECKER

I have a gnu spell checker; it came with my pea see.
It plane lee marks four my review miss steaks aye dew knot sea.

Eye ran this poem threw it, yore shore reel glad to no;
Its very polished in it’s weigh. My checker tolled me sew.

Each frays come posed up on my screen eye trust to be a joule.
The checker pores or every word to cheque sum spelling rule...



That scrap of verse (The whole poem* is a lot longer, but somewhat boring) first came across my desk twenty years ago. And though word processing software is now immensely more sophisticated than the DOS-based copy of WordPerfect I used then, apparently the spelling skills of Internet correspondents have atrophied.

Have another look at that sample of doggerel: every word contained passes the spell checker in my version of MS-Word (except “cheque,” since I have UK rules turned off). And yet of the seventy-two words contained, thirty-four are flat-out wrong. They're homonyms of the right word.


Remember Homonyms From School?

Homonyms are two (or more) words that sound the same but have different meanings. "Through" and “threw” or “right” and “write” are examples. Most of us probably wouldn’t mis-type “jewel” as “joule” in everyday writing – I mean, how often does the MKS unit of energy come up in your conversation, right? There are, though, plenty of common “swapped” homonyms cropping up constantly in writing on this site that – to put it bluntly – make me cringe when I see them.

Since spell-checkers are notorious for their inability to read your mind (and that yellow-billed wordpicker on the “Submit a Review” page is worse than most), it’s still your job as a writer to proofread your work. Pay close attention to homonyms when you do because, for some of us, they simply leap off the page. Here are just four of the sets that are most frequently abused:

your and you’re:
your is a possessive pronoun: “your book” means “the book belonging to you”
you’re is a contraction of “you are”: “You’re cute” means “You are cute.”

NOT: Your so vain you think you’re face is godlike.
YES: You’re so vain you think your face is godlike.


do and due (ignoring ‘dew’ for now):
do to means “to perform an action on or against”
due to means “caused by” or “because of”

NOT: Do to the weather, I had to calculate the area of a circle.
YES: Due to the weather, I had to calculate the perimeter of a square.


their, there, they’re:

their is a possessive pronoun: “their paradiddle” is “the paradiddle belonging to them.”
there denotes a place: “Don’t put the oxen here, put them over there.”
they’re is a contraction of “they are”: “They’re solipsists” means “They are solipsists.”

NOT: There supposed to park they’re humvees their, inside the chain link fence.
YES: They’re supposed to park their humvees there, inside the chain link fence.


its and it’s
its is a possessive pronoun: “its lumbar pillow” is “the lumbar pillow belonging to it.”
it’s is a contraction for “it is”: “It’s raining ungulants and ruminants outside” means “It is raining ungulants and ruminants outside.”

NOT: Its so hot today the building is hiding in it’s shadow.
YES: It’s so hot today the building is hiding in its shadow.


Why Bother?

In the real world, you’re judged by your work – whether you're writing for a teacher, a boss, or a client, you should want to put the best possible face on your work. Careless substitutions of homonyms and letting a spell checker do the work both suggest to a reader that your work habits are sloppy. No matter whether you’re writing a quick note to a loved one, a letter of application for a job, or a formal report for your job, practice proofreading. And don’t depend on a spell checker to get it write four ewe!


This is intended to be the first of a series of notes from the Grammar Curmudgeon, an irregular series of… what, “diatribes”? “rants”? “suggestions”? on improving the quality of your writing – not just here on Epinions, but every time you create a sentence, a paragraph, or even a book. Feel free to suggest further topics (I already have a generation’s worth up my sleeve).


See the next Grammar Curmudgeon rant at Apostrophes


* see http://www2.misnet.com/~rick/mensa/oct96.html for a longer version

 Read all comments (30)
 Write your own comment
scmrak

Epinions.com ID:
scmrak
scmrak is a Lead on Epinions in Cars & Motorsports
scmrak is an Advisor on Epinions in Books
scmrak is a Top Reviewer on Epinions in Home and Garden, Hotels & Travel, Books
Epinions Most Popular Authors - Top 50
Location: ~240000E, 3300000N UTM15
Reviews written: 1352
Trusted by: 410 members
About Me:
I'm taking my football and going home.


Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds | Price Comparison UK

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.