|
 |
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Count me in (Reply to this comment)
by dbcint
I know just the review to use as well
|
Oct 13 '03 9:13 pm PDT
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: hey there... (Reply to this comment)
by sleeper54
..
... lol ... (really!)
Well, damn. You forgot to include a number in the title. That's the problem! (And it's not that you are a user that doesn't know about numbers...)
And that 20-something thing. It's not every day that a user hits the freaking mother lode and then scurries away from the site when the heat gets turned up a little. (Are 'scurry' and 'heat' PC enough?)
Love your stuff John. Even if you do have a wheel on a stick stuck up your a... uhh, stuck in your house. Even if I don't come around enough enough to show it...
Better get busy on mine. I got some self-pimpage to get done! And maybe a few others...
...tom...
Random quotation day #3:
"We've had too many World AIDS Days." —Richard Gere
|
Oct 13 '03 3:25 pm PDT
|
|
... (Reply to this comment)
by WilliamJones
trust: this W/O certainly has an appeal for me, but, right now, I don't know which Epinion to include or what to write. So hold off on counting me in.
Of your six suggested ideas for linkage, #5 (because it's the easiest) seems most favorable. I'm not much of an altruist and the appeal hereto be honestis in plugging something written by me.
I'll have to think over the other avenues.
Regards,
Bill
|
Oct 13 '03 1:49 pm PDT
|
|
Re: Re: Re: hey there... (Reply to this comment)
by trust12345
Hey again, Tom-
Thanks for the kind-spirited reply.
Don't mention it.
Which is why your 'write-off' should work much better. Because a review w/o is continually 'pumped up' by new entries linking back to the others linking back to the original review or user page.
We'll see if anyone hops on aboard. Thus far, this is no "20 things about me and my poodle."
By 'inclusion here' I meant simply my posting of the URL in your comment thread. Your inclusion of it in the body of review greatly 'exceeded my expectations'!!
It wasn't but a thing. It's anyway the right thing to do, no?
I see a day when the 'just-in' pages are dry and dusty and empty. As all Epinions readers spend every Epinions moment reading the old stuff here on the site. With no time to write.
Is that some time in the spring of 3074?
The guilt, my gallant sir, shall weigh heavily on your shoulders!
I can handle it. I'm Jewish.
--John
|
Oct 13 '03 1:17 pm PDT
|
|
Re: hey (Reply to this comment)
by trust12345
Jan-
I already read that spoof and really enjoyed it. I might think about this...
Thanks... and please do (submit an entry)!
--JKS
|
Oct 13 '03 1:12 pm PDT
|
|
Re: Re: hey there... (Reply to this comment)
by sleeper54
..
hey there again, John...
Thanks for the kind-spirited reply.
Actually, I thought the 'comment-off' would work better than it did. But I think the 'shelf-life' of a single review is days short. Unless you 'promote' the hell out of it, which I did not.
Which is why your 'write-off' should work much better. Because a review w/o is continually 'pumped up' by new entries linking back to the others linking back to the original review or user page.
By 'inclusion here' I meant simply my posting of the URL in your comment thread. Your inclusion of it in the body of review greatly 'exceeded my expectations'!! (Sorry, was recently annual evaluation time at work.)
I see a day when the 'just-in' pages are dry and dusty and empty. As all Epinions readers spend every Epinions moment reading the old stuff here on the site. With no time to write.
The guilt, my gallant sir, shall weigh heavily on your shoulders!
Thanks again for the mention in your review...
...tom...
Random quotation day #3:
"It ain't the heat, it's the humility." —Yogi Berra
|
Oct 13 '03 8:01 am PDT
|
|
hey (Reply to this comment)
by jankp
I already read that spoof and really enjoyed it. I might think about this...
Jan
|
Oct 13 '03 12:59 am PDT
|
|
Re: hey there... (Reply to this comment)
by trust12345
Hi, I mean, Hey there...
There is nothing new on Epinions...
I figured this had already probably been done. I didn't know it had been done so recently!
"The First Great 'Read-this-now!' Comment-Off"
A somewhat dismal effort to accomplish what you are trying to do (I believe) here. I would gladly re-name it in honor of your write-off here and now.
Why rename it? Or, that is awfully kind, good man. But I like option 2:
Or my simple inclusion here might garner some eyeballs for all the suggestions that were left there earlier this summer.
I will update this review to send people your way, and hence, in the direction of all those who joined your W/O. In that fashion (drum roll or egg roll please...), the resurrected and re-vanished reviews can once again appear-- and then for a third time, take their rightful place in the Lethe sleep of resting words (to be jostled at random for eternity).
Glad to see I'm following in such illustrious company, a dwarf as it were on the shoulder of a giant. So, won't you ever be adding me to your invisible but visible WOT? Or do I have to do my bear dance while singing an aria from La Traviata, fireworks shooting out of my orifi?
Humbly,
John
|
Oct 12 '03 10:56 pm PDT
|
|
hey there... (Reply to this comment)
by sleeper54
..
There is nothing new on Epinions...
Let me leave this URL for consideration:
http://www.epinions.com/content_3370360964
"The First Great 'Read-this-now!' Comment-Off"
A somewhat dismal effort to accomplish what you are trying to do (I believe) here. I would gladly re-name it in honor of your write-off here and now.
Or my simple inclusion here might garner some eyeballs for all the suggestions that were left there earlier this summer.
Let me know what you think.
...tom...
Random quotation day #2:
"Beauty and folly are old companions." —Benjamin Franklin
|
Oct 12 '03 7:53 pm PDT
|
|
|
|