|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
got more? (Reply to this comment)
by zignit
perfect... thanks for the giggles. I've learned much about rake and fathers.
|
Oct 07 '08
12:17 am PDT
|
|
Aswome (Reply to this comment)
by tbutler4582
oh that was freakin halarious. And I learned something. :-)
|
Apr 16 '07
1:40 pm PDT
|
|
great (Reply to this comment)
by cap_squash
You do a nice job at exposing crappy reviewers like me. Anyway, this was the first time I actually laughed while reading a review. And I've read a lot of reviews here...
|
Sep 17 '04
9:33 pm PDT
|
|
Classic.. (Reply to this comment)
by contakt
Hilarious. I've only written three reviews so far.. one falling into the "boring track by track" category, and the other two "standard"
Maybe I should try the Jive Honky next...
Although I have already used the word "dope" as in meaning good, ..in a review, and thus have already succumbed to that level...
|
Jul 10 '04
10:31 am PDT
|
|
Dude (Reply to this comment)
by grez
"then my dad beat me w/ a rake"
-- best line in the whole thing, and it came right at the end. Good thing I have on a healthy pair of adult underpants, or I would have pissed myself.
;-)
Grez
|
Dec 09 '03
11:38 am PST
|
|
aw... (Reply to this comment)
by Guildenstern
oh man, I feel so inadequate now... must find... new review format...
Just when I was struggling for ideas, you come along and mark all the territory. Damn I hate creative people.
Nice job here
SImon
|
Nov 24 '03
2:07 pm PST
|
|
I know you said (Reply to this comment)
by katmar
that the track-by-track review is boring, but I think it depends on the author of said review.
I will take an interesting TBT review over a schizophrenic "interview" or "screenplay" review any day. And you even have to be pretty creative to pull off "the letter".
Anyway, interesting write-up.
Marsha
|
Nov 23 '03
8:05 pm PST
|
|
Said Review was Awesome (Reply to this comment)
by plorentz
That was a blast! And Spike says "Hi", and thanks for linking to him, and can he hump your leg?
-Paul
|
Nov 23 '03
8:50 am PST
|
|
@[xxxx]§:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::> (Reply to this comment)
by flamepillar
I do believe that about covers everyone on the site... and then some!
|
Nov 23 '03
7:23 am PST
|
|
oh no, I'm boring! (Reply to this comment)
by pnutmom
I've written one music review here, and used the track-by-track method, but slightly different than the way you have it here. Maybe I should re-write it somehow...
And Sleeper54, Ebonics translator. lol I'll have to send that link to my Dad, fo shizzle...
|
Nov 22 '03
6:58 pm PST
|
|
hey there... (Reply to this comment)
by sleeper54
..
Damn. You gots made me afraid ta jet peep at muh ma fuckin one an' only music review here. I be afraid ta know what 'style' it muh ma fuckin most resemble...
And I th'o't ya gots scared me off 'music' fo' quite some tyme. The readers dere should thank ya... ya'll is mad stupid.
I do know dat ah found great value in yo' thoughts, thank ya w0rd! Don't make me come ovah dere beeotch...
...tom...
Limited eubonics crap above is from:
http://www.joel.net/EBONICS/translator.asp
|
Nov 22 '03
2:49 pm PST
|
|
|
