"VETOES BY SILENCE" HAMPER LABOR
Nov 09 '09
The Bottom Line The democratic principle of "majority rules" does not apply to unionization votes in the airline and railroad industries.
Nothing is more basic to our democratic society than the principle of
majority rule. But what if the eligible voters who fail to cast ballots were
automatically recorded as voting “no”?
Ridiculous as it sounds, that’s exactly what the country’s airline and
railroad workers face when they vote on whether they want union
representation.
Imagine if every election had such a rule. President Obama wouldn’t be
president, since less than half the eligible voters turned out for last
year’s presidential election. Most, if not all, congressional candidates
would also have lost last year -- or in any other election year -- since
voter turnout for congressional elections has typically been less than 40
percent.
It’s doubtful, in fact, that anyone would win any election under the rules
that govern the transportation union elections. Other unions are covered by
the National Labor Relations Act, which follows the simple democratic rule
that it should be voters –- and voters alone -- who determine the outcome
of elections. Non-voters have no voice in those elections – or in any other
elections of any kind anywhere else.
The airline and railroad workers are covered by the Railway Labor Act. That
law calls for the three-member National Mediation Board to set the rules for
union elections.
As the AFL-CIO’s Transportation Trades Department has requested, the board is proposing to void the rule that has allowed non-voters to be counted as
voting “no.” The board has scheduled public hearings on the proposal – and
is certain to hear heated arguments on both sides of the question.
The unions should have no trouble arguing their case. As President Edward
Wytkind of the Transportation Trades Department notes, the current voting
system “defies logic … makes no sense.” The unions are asking merely that
the system be made “to conform to the norms of American democracy.”
Which means, of course, that “the majority of those casting a vote will
decide the outcome and those who do not vote are not counted.” Wytkind
wonders “how we can justify imposing higher turnout standards for airline
and railroad union elections than we can for the highest office of the
land?”
The answer should be obvious – but not to airline and railroad executives,
who want to keep unionization of their industries at a minimum. Under the
current election rules that the executives prefer, the odds clearly are with
them.
Suppose, as often happens, that a majority of the employees of a particular
airline or railroad who turn out to vote opt for unionization. Their votes,
even if overwhelmingly pro-union, can be nullified if a higher number of
workers simply fail to vote.
It’s what Wytkind calls a “veto by silence.” And it’s usually the result of
“employer –run voter suppression campaigns” that keep many workers from
voting and are among the main reasons for the slowdown in airline
unionization in recent years.
Some employers have increased their odds even more by including on their
list of employees eligible to vote the names of employees who’ve resigned,
been terminated or retired.
Employers can argue that if a worker doesn’t turn out to vote, it’s a sure
sign the worker is not interested in unionization. But there can be no
solid evidence of that unless the worker is allowed to actually cast a vote
on the question.
Counting the worker’s non-vote as a “no” vote violates basic democratic
principles and the basic union rights promised all American workers.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID:
meiste
|
|
Member: dick meister
Location: San Francisco, California
Reviews written: 298
Trusted by: 24 members
About Me:
Journalist Meiste's work has been used by more than 350 print, broadcast and online outlets.
|
|
|
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.