|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Re: Super review (Reply to this comment)
by paulphoto,  in Computer Hardware
Hi Solo!
Thank you very much for your visit and comment! The greatest thing about this printer is that I am still using it regularly both for printing photos and text, and still impressed with its quality. I have gone through many cartridges that I can't remember the count.
As for the high-res print, I think that if the image's resolution is within the 600-700 dpi, the regular print mode is fine. I normally print very high resolution images (scanned from my slides using high-res scanner), around 1500 to 2900 dpi max, so I need to use its high resolution print mode.
I have had experience with the printer shaking, especially when I print address envelopes. But it's pretty stable and quiet when printing photos. My printer sits on a firm desk so I think that may be the case, too. And yeah, it's made of plastic. But, after more than one year of everyday use for producing great photos, and it's still working great, I have nothing to complaint about.
Thanks again for the visit. Great printer!
Paul
|
Jun 06 '04
7:17 pm PDT
|
|
Super review (Reply to this comment)
by solohans1
I enjoyed your review.
I own this printer also. I wouldn't consider any other company than HP(ink jet pioneer) for printing and was thrilled when they came out with 6 color printing. It definitely improves the color range and picks out some area that show up indistinctly without it.
It's important that you covered the technology behind this printer and compared it to Epson. Most people don't know the technology involved with ink jet and that it differs greatly from company to company. I do prefer HP's thermal to Epson's piezoelectric. I've heard plenty of complaints about Epson's print head clogging. This is mostly due to inactivity and piezoelectric technology. This doesn't happen with HP.
Another difference is the types of inks used. Some are pigment-based(preferred and HP use it) and dye-based(Epson). Pigment based in requires less drying time although slightly more expensive than dye.
I always use PhotoRet setting(pixel enhancement technology) rather than high-resolution(2400X4800). I don't notice significant differences in the end result and save time and money, but maybe I'll give the high resolution another try after reading your review.
My only negative comment is this PhotoSmart series doesn't seem as sturdy as the 1XXX series(i.e., 1215). The machine is quiet, but when the carriage moves the whole printer seems to move with it. This doesn't interfere with performance, but it just doesn't make the printer seem as 'solid.'
Keep up the fine reviews.
solo.
|
Jun 03 '04
12:28 pm PDT
|
|
Re: Thanks to paulphoto for the input on Epson Stylus Photo 820/HP PhotoSmart 7150 (Reply to this comment)
by paulphoto, in Computer Hardware
Thank you for your visit.
I have been using this printer regularly now. I mostly make photo prints, and I am continually impressed with its performance! I really think this printer is a great investment for a budget-priced photo printer. I love it!
Right now, I am trying to keep a record of the number of photo prints one cartridge can produce. The number is higher than I originally estimated. I will post the result as soon as it becomes available, and will commend on the expense on cartridges.
Paul
|
Aug 04 '03
11:55 am PDT
|
|
Thanks to paulphoto for the input on Epson Stylus Photo 820/HP PhotoSmart 7150 (Reply to this comment)
by assimilator
I read your review on the Epson 820 and then jumped to this review on the HP 7150. I own the 820 for about a year now and have experienced the same problems as you (paulphoto) have--uses too much ink and is seriously prone to clogging. In fact, the reason I'm shopping for a new printer is that my 820 is permanently clogged now. Yes, the images are impressive for $99.99 but are still sub-standard and do not quite compete with what you would get from a lab (professional or not). After reading your review I am probably going to get that HP 7150. It sounds like it has the features I want (high quality photo prints, reliability...) and none of the ones I don't need (built-in memory card readers...). Thank you paulphoto.
|
May 15 '03
10:59 pm PDT
|
|
Re: Good Review (Reply to this comment)
by paulphoto, in Computer Hardware
Hi Harv,
I'm glad you asked that question. I was meaning to update this review regarding the expense on ink cartridges.
The HP ink cartridges cost $24.95, locally. I just picked up three cartridges (HP#56, #57 and #58, each is $25) at Staples. So far, I have estimated making between 40-45 4x6-inch prints. I usually print three (not two) 4x6's on an 8.5x11-inch photo paper. I have not completely exhausted the first two cartridges yet, but almost empty.
Since I also made a lot of text prints, I have exhausted one cartridge (HP#58) more than the other. At this rate, I think I can probably produce another 10-15 more 4x6-inch photos on an 8.5x11-inch paper.
The HP ink cartridges are priced roughly similar to those of the Epson. My Epson 820 printer uses Epson cartridges T26 (black, $24.95 at local Wal-Mart) and T27 (color, $19.95 also at Wal-Mart). In terms of cost effective and savings, I think the HP is still a great deal.
I hope this helps.
Paul
|
Feb 28 '03
8:03 am PST
|
|
Good Review (Reply to this comment)
by hyflyer11
Paul,
How does the cost of the ink compare with the Epson's ink cost? What do you estimate is your cost of a 4"X6" photo (printed 2 to a page)?
I've only owned Epson printers. Now may be the time to buy an HP.
Thanks for the review.
Harv
|
Feb 27 '03
8:43 am PST
|
|
|
|
