Sort by Product Rating |
Sort by Review Date |
| Product Rating: |  |
| |  |
|
|
|
by colonialpara - Top 500, Jan 23 '04
Pros: Beautiful, vivid colors. Faster than the original. Minimal grain at enlargement. Cons: Less flexible than print films of same speed.
That's a question all of us who shoot slide film, but especially those of us who rave about Velvia 50 have been asking. Perhaps more importantly, all the photo mags have been predicting that the ISO 100 version of Velvia will replace its older, slower ...
Read the full review
|
| Product Rating: |  |
| |  |
|
|
|
by otola , Jan 07 '04
Pros: The right amount of color saturation with excellent grain and contrast. Cons: Not cheap
As an avid slide shooter of cities and landscapes, mostly during vacation trips, I have generally preferred the look and quality of Fuji slide film over those offered by Kodak (sorry Rochester!). However, because I use relatively "slow" (although high ...
Read the full review
|
| Express Reviews |
| Product Rating: |  |
| |  |
|
|
|
Not the real thing
by joseazevedo ,Feb 18 '05
Pros: No grain Cons: Uninspiring colors
I thought this was a faster Velvia but it doesn't came out the way it was supposed to be or at least as the name suggests. Colors lack spark, they are not that much saturated nor exciting. And I expose with a little underexposure when shooting slides, to increase color saturation... But colors didn't "happen", they're conventional and uninspiring.
Fuji's Provia beats this film 10 x 0. Colors are MUCH better and grain is the quite close if not the same.
On Japan they have a Velvia 100 (without "F") which is more to what one'd expect from a film with this name.
Rate this review
|
|
|