Nokia 3210 GSM Cellular Phone

47 consumer reviews |Write a Review
Average Rating: Excellent
5 stars
16
4 stars
22
3 stars
7
2 stars
2
1 star
Share This!
  Ask friends for feedback
Read all 51 Reviews | Write a Review

About the Author

gjleake
Epinions.com ID: gjleake
Reviews written: 7
Trusted by: 1 member

it's good, but a step back from the 5110

Written: Dec 05 '00
  • User Rating: Excellent
  • Durability:
  • Clarity:
  • Portability:
  • Battery Life:
Pros:light, predictive SMS typing
Cons:low capacity battery, poor reception antenna

this phone is an obvious step on in some ways from the 5110. It's lighter, has predictive SMS typing, where is guesses what you're going to type from the first couple of characters you type, it has better case changing options, but it is also a step back in as many ways.

The antenna has been changed to a flat spiral plate inside the housing. This results in poorer reception most of the time, which, although they claim 260 hours standby, experience has shown over 8 users I know, that the real standby is closer to 100 hours, probably due to the phone spending much more of its time in high power mode; which in turn probably contributes to risky radiation issues.

The battery is a low capacity thing which does not reach the suggested standby time.



Recommended: Yes

Write the first comment on this review!
Read all 51 Reviews | Write a Review

Share with your friends   
Share This!