Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Learn More! | Sign In   
Home > Message Boards > Epinions > Epinions General > New Search Stuff...

New Search Stuff...
Posts on this Topic   Search in Epinions General   
Showing 41-60 of 201 posts Previous  Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next 
Hide member images Print         
   
rcjones Posted: Oct 30 '07,  2:17 pm           
Reviews written: 4
Member since: Nov 26 '05
Post: 157517
RE: New Search Stuff...

Thoroughly confused now. I am trying to read the appropriate continuing saga of the bugs. Seems like each thread has a link to another. :(

I do have a question.
Have certain name brands been removed from epinions?
I ask because all of my Craftsman and Black & Decker reviews are no longer linked to H&G category and cannot be found by searching for the product.

To top it off... my Spectricide bug fogger review has a "no category" bug too.

Will one bug report cover all? Or should each product have a report filed?

Please help. I am pretty clueless at this point.
RC

   
Andyman Posted: Oct 30 '07,  2:31 pm           
Reviews written: 131
Member since: Sep 29 '99
Post: 157519
RE: New Search Stuff...

Quote: rcjones
I do have a question. Have certain name brands been removed from epinions? I ask because all of my Craftsman and Black & Decker reviews are no longer linked to H&G category and cannot be found by searching for the product.


Heya RC.

We didn't remove those brands from the site. The products are findable, they're just a little harder to find than you'd expect. Let's look at one together.

You have a review titled:
No, It's Not a Craftsman__It's a Black and Decker VSR Drill
on the product
Black & Decker 5-Ampere Variable Speed Reversible Drill DR202

So let's look for that product in search.

1. Here's a search for DR202
2. Notice the product is not on the first page of results. Darn!
3. However, click Tools and Accessories at left and you will come to the following page
4. Voila. There's the product you reviewed. Click though and you can see your review.

The Search Engine is a learning computer program. Over time it will adjust and show popular products that people click on most often at the top. But it also takes into account the age of the product, the presence of an image, and some other factors. In this case the result you wanted wasn't on page 1, but it's still in there. Don't give up.

Quote: rcjones
To top it off... my Spectricide bug fogger review has a "no category" bug too.

Will one bug report cover all? Or should each product have a report filed?


I've told Engineering to fix Hats first, and work on the "no category" bug immediately afterward. We'll fix it. I don't think we need more examples than we have already received. Don't worry, the review is not "uncategorized." It's just a display snafu on your profile page that's preventing the category name from being shown there.

That help any?

   
rcjones Posted: Oct 30 '07,  2:49 pm           
Reviews written: 4
Member since: Nov 26 '05
Post: 157523
RE: New Search Stuff...

Yes, it helped. Thank you.
I thought this bug thing was so big that it ate my bug killer review. :p

Big thanks!
RC

   
njchicaa Posted: Oct 30 '07,  4:08 pm           
Reviews written: 739
Member since: Jun 27 '05
Post: 157538
RE: New Search Stuff...

Quote: Andyman
I've told Engineering to fix Hats first, and work on the "no category" bug immediately afterward. We'll fix it.


Hi Andy. Will the hat and no category bug-fixes include Pets?

Thanks,
Jill
   
Andyman Posted: Oct 30 '07,  4:56 pm           
Reviews written: 131
Member since: Sep 29 '99
Post: 157548
RE: New Search Stuff...

Quote: njchicaa
Hi Andy. Will the hat and no category bug-fixes include Pets?


Yes. The confounding thing is that we encountered all this with Pets and Wine and thought we'd stamped it out. We were hoping the release would fix it for Pets and that it would not become an issue elsewhere. Not sure what happened there... but yeah, we'll take care of Pets for sure. You guys have been really patient.
   
KMINER Posted: Oct 30 '07,  7:07 pm (Updated: Oct 30 '07,  7:09 pm)           
Reviews written: 1004
Member since: Jan 17 '00
moderator in Kids & Family
Post: 157577
RE: New Search Stuff...

Okay, also, I didn't see this addressed.

http://www.epinions.com/hmgd/show_~recent_content

It says no reviews in the Just In's ... so I can't rate H&G for Advisor stuff?

Help :)

Also, when I rate Beauty reviews (B&W they are now listed in) my Blue tag doesn't show up ... but I see other Blue tags on the review just fine?

Kimm

   
northeastgal Posted: Oct 30 '07,  8:48 pm           
Reviews written: 262
Member since: Jun 20 '05
Post: 157586
RE: New Search Stuff...

I too didn't see my tag in the H & G. But works in most.

I also noticed something strange. Duct tape is in
Home > Business & Technology > Office Supply > Office Supplies.

I'm sure there are others misplaced but not sure if I was to post this here.


   
susieq112 Posted: Oct 30 '07,  9:35 pm           
Reviews written: 542
Member since: Dec 30 '01
Post: 157590
...

Ok, in the first page of toys (http://www.epinions.com/kifm-Toys-All) we have a few different devices to narrow down the toys, but why can't they be narrowed down by brand. I thought I would point this out because that was the main way I went through the catalog before and since it is no longer there as a starter option it makes it harder to navigate. Will this be changed in the future?

Sorry I wanted to get that suggestion in, before I started asking questions.

1. I understand that we do not need to file bug reports on reviews that are not listed under a category on our profiles, but I have a few reviews that seem to have vanished. This is the link I get when I click to go to the review (http://www.epinions.com/search/?submitted_form=searchbar&search_string=&no_results_vertical=all&no_results_vertical_name=&linkin_id=8003929). I haven't found anyway to access the review, should I file a bug report on this? And even if I do, can the review be summoned up, or is it official "gone"?

2. There are tons of duplicates, should we start filing reports on those?

3. There are new listings for many products (along with duplicates) should we try to move our reviews to the new listings or leave them? Essentially are people still going to be able to find my reviews later on down the road and where will they be able to find them easier?

Thanks
Susan

   
ifif1938 Posted: Oct 30 '07,  10:02 pm           
Reviews written: 799
Member since: Jan 17 '00
Post: 157594
RE: Yuck

Is there any problem in Movies? I think I lost a review but not sure if it was a review or part of a 10 best list, I mean the movie I reviewed, so I was wondering if anyone else has had a problem in Movies...

   
roheblius Posted: Oct 30 '07,  10:07 pm (Updated: Oct 30 '07,  10:08 pm)           
Reviews written: 601
Member since: Dec 13 '99
moderator in Music
Post: 157596
RE: Yuck

Quote: caffienatedyak
Let me just say I hate the new search engine with the fiery passion of a thousand burning nuns. I can only hope it's temporary. Don't like the scrunched-up look. Don't like the fact that a billion things, including PRODUCTS I'VE REVIEWED that have shown up previously, have been shed. Lots of things have been shed (including pretty much anything I ever requested to be added to the search engine).

I thought this was supposed to help the search engine, not make it worse. So again, I can only hope all the crap is temporary, because it's a complete screw-up and a pain.


Please read above and/or any threads that Andy has posted in.
   
cmaw63 Posted: Oct 30 '07,  10:18 pm (Updated: Oct 30 '07,  10:42 pm)           
Reviews written: 307
Member since: Dec 10 '06
moderator in Hotels & Travel
Post: 157599
RE: Yuck

Quote: roheblius
Please read above and/or any threads that Andy has posted in.

I have found that one or two of my reviews (maybe more, I didn't do an in depth search) are in the new search/database, just under different names. Example: Schultz Peat Moss (old) is now listed as 8qt. SPHAGNUM PEAT MOSS (new). Same exact product yet it shows no reviews. Should I move the reviews that are exactly the same, but have new updated names?

Sorry if this has been answered before.

Julie

edited to add: Having a "new & improved" name for the product seems to be the problem with my non-category reviews. They are the exact same product in the new listing, just with more words added/missing from the original product title.
   
rancid1993 Posted: Oct 30 '07,  11:10 pm           
Reviews written: 316
Member since: Sep 30 '03
Post: 157602
SAP

How will suggest a product and the Lead program be affected by the change?

Will Leads still be able to make new products available to review?

An example would be FIFA 08 for PS2 which is listed in the 17 search results but isn't available to write about.

   
roheblius Posted: Oct 30 '07,  11:42 pm           
Reviews written: 601
Member since: Dec 13 '99
moderator in Music
Post: 157603
RE: Yuck

Quote: caffienatedyak
Yeah, I'll be able to find any and all threads he's posted in. Maybe if you people had set up a post-update thread to begin with regarding all of this instead of relying on everyone ELSE to start the discussion...


You know what Yak Daddy, you're right. However, we were all working very late last night and some of the members just beat us to creating the threads. Remember that we're on the West Coast and and some of those posts were something like 3AM our time.

Hopefully we'll be able to put some stuff together that helps to easier explain the situation. Right now, I think we all just want to get some rest.
   
Joubert Posted: Oct 31 '07,  4:29 am           
Reviews written: 370
Member since: Jun 18 '00
Post: 157610
Starting a thread and replying to one

Hey, gang, let's all chill on throwing bricks around our little glass shop, okay?

I think I was the first CL to send someone to a bug form when they started a thread early in the morning. That's because Garrett or Andy wrote us while I was asleep and said something along the lines of "We're going to try this tomorrow. Help us keep everything coordinated in one place and file bugs, okay?" So that's what I suggested.

The implication (as many of you who work in IT know) is that you can't have questions on a forum, a wiki, in email and on the actual forms. Sizing all issues in one place allows the operations and development team to set priorities.

After a couple of years of people pounding the site for a search engine, new features are launched. Sorry some don't like it yet. I doubt it will be scrapped. Meanwhile, there are bugs, issues and style preferences. But good Lord, be part of the solution.

File a bug. Save your criticisms until a time when they can be constructive, and you've actually used a working version. Stop worrying about a review or 10 or 50. You know that they are there. You know that it will be fixed. And if not, really, so what? 20 of your reviews disappear. It happens. Anyone remember the notion that reviews wouldn't earn IS after 2 years?

Hang on for the bumpy ride, laugh a little like you stood in line for a roller coaster, and let's revisit it as a community when the ride is over. Standing up in the middle of the ride serves no purpose except to distract the people who need to fix the issues raised in the first push.

I've seen massive upgrades similar to this multiple times this year. I can't think of one where the company's staff - who should have been working on issues - came to member/customer message boards to be alternately questioned, have their work reviewed or castigated.

How about two quick examples from the rest of the world? Google's AdSense reporting was messed up last week. For at least three days, maybe four, the money was right, but not the counts of sites or channels or whatever you had customized. This bug affected tens of thousands of people. There were two (2) Google announcements during that time -- one over a day into the problem that acknowledged there was an issue and a second that it was fixed. That's it. I can't remember if the second message even apologized.

While we're talking about search engines, let's not pick on Google. Yahoo publicly acknowledged this week (after the bloggers outted them) that statistics reported to webmasters in Yahoo's console were wrong. Just plain wrong. They finished with the statement that they would fix things and let people know when it was fixed. [I really enjoyed telling my clients that yesterday since they are part of the metrics I provide them]

Here's a final example. Mozilla patched multiple security holes in Firefox this month. When they did so, they opened up at least five more and had to rush another patch to market. There wasn't even a public statement urging Firefox users to download the patch.

We have it pretty good at Epinions. The team is talking with us. There is linkage to a huge shopping destination. The URLs will help get more visibility, if not more traffic. Known bugs in the SAP process are fixed. Let them fix the thing up before we open with guns blazing.

File a bug that helps them identify issues. Stop saying, "Oh, one more thing...." on the message board. Pull together, huh?

   
chelledun Posted: Oct 31 '07,  4:59 am (Updated: Oct 31 '07,  5:00 am)           
Reviews written: 1054
Member since: May 16 '03
moderator in Hotels & Travel
Post: 157615
RE: Starting a thread and replying to one

As the one who started this thread, I'd like to thank Andy for his responses, they have been Very Helpful. I'd also like to note that I wasn't trying to start a big drama. At the time I started it, I had no idea that Read Only time had been so extended and hadn't seen Andy's early morning post in that thread. I just woke up and saw that everything was all different and I couldn't find anything.

In any case, it's good to know that the new search has the ability to learn and change with time and that it appears we are, at least, seeing some change toward better search capabilities.

Michelle

   
cmaw63 Posted: Oct 31 '07,  6:21 am           
Reviews written: 307
Member since: Dec 10 '06
moderator in Hotels & Travel
Post: 157624
RE: Yuck

Quote: cmaw63
I have found that one or two of my reviews (maybe more, I didn't do an in depth search) are in the new search/database, just under different names. Example: Schultz Peat Moss (old) is now listed as 8qt. SPHAGNUM PEAT MOSS (new). Same exact product yet it shows no reviews. Should I move the reviews that are exactly the same, but have new updated names?

Sorry if this has been answered before.

Julie

edited to add: Having a "new & improved" name for the product seems to be the problem with my non-category reviews. They are the exact same product in the new listing, just with more words added/missing from the original product title.

I saw Andy's reply above in this thread. It states that there is a "new name", but our old review of the same product is out there somewhere. All I want to know is... would it be beneficial to Epinions, and me, to move my review to the new search acknowledged name?

It is a quick, simple fix for several of my reviews, unless for some reason you (general Epinions staff you) want me to wait and let everything sort itself out.
   
Andyman Posted: Oct 31 '07,  8:38 am           
Reviews written: 131
Member since: Sep 29 '99
Post: 157634
RE: ...

Quote: susieq112
Ok, in the first page of toys (http://www.epinions.com/kifm-Toys-All) we have a few different devices to narrow down the toys, but why can't they be narrowed down by brand.


Brand vanished in a couple of places unexpectedly. Bug has been filed on that one.

Quote: susieq112
1. I understand that we do not need to file bug reports on reviews that are not listed under a category on our profiles, but I have a few reviews that seem to have vanished. This is the link I get when I click to go to the review (http://www.epinions.com/search/?submitted_form=searchbar&search_string=&no_results_vertical=all&no_results_vertical_name=&linkin_id=8003929). I haven't found anyway to access the review


This is also a bug and has been filed. We are miscontructing some review URLs on your profile page. Your review is safe, we're just showing you a bad pointer to it on your profile. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Quote: susieq112
2. There are tons of duplicates, should we start filing reports on those?


Duplicate reports are always welcome. However, duplicates in some measure will probably always be on the site. Shopping.com's product catalog folks keep track of their duplicate rate and work hard to cut it down, down, down... but it's hard to eliminate completely. I don't expect members to file 10,000 duplicate reports. But if you want to help clean things up, please do. And if a duplicate is making it harder for you to find one of your reviews, please do. All such reports are routed to our catalog operation.

Quote: susieq112
3. There are new listings for many products (along with duplicates) should we try to move our reviews to the new listings or leave them? Essentially are people still going to be able to find my reviews later on down the road and where will they be able to find them easier?


The answer to this is the same answer to "which one should I write on?"

When in doubt use the following steps to determine which product to write on. Choose the product:

1) shown highest in the list and/or search results
2) which has an image and merchant deals
3) which already has reviews

#1 should be your priority, though. If you want to move your review to a product that shows up higher in the search results, go right ahead. Just keep in mind that you can't move your review onto a merchant deal (the ones that say "buy it" and have no "write a review" link).

Hope that helps
   
Andyman Posted: Oct 31 '07,  8:42 am (Updated: Oct 31 '07,  8:46 am)           
Reviews written: 131
Member since: Sep 29 '99
Post: 157635
this is the thread

Actually, yak, I have been posting pretty much everything in this thread. I ducked into one or two others but I told folks there that I'd be concentrating here.

Sorry you're unhappy with Search. We are aware that the products carried over from the old catalog (the ones with reviews) are not showing up high enough in search. This will even out over time. See my first post in this thread for more info on that.

But without more specific feedback I can't respond to your posting in any further detail, except to say we're not going back.

Michelle - thank you for starting this thread. We knew full well going in that this would be a significant change to the site and that there'd be a transition period with bugs and less-than-optimized search relevance for some queries. I am more than happy to engage you guys and do what I can to smooth the bumps.

   
cmaw63 Posted: Oct 31 '07,  9:46 am           
Reviews written: 307
Member since: Dec 10 '06
moderator in Hotels & Travel
Post: 157640
RE: Yuck

Quote: cmaw63
I saw Andy's reply above in this thread. It states that there is a "new name", but our old review of the same product is out there somewhere. All I want to know is... would it be beneficial to Epinions, and me, to move my review to the new search acknowledged name?

It is a quick, simple fix for several of my reviews, unless for some reason you (general Epinions staff you) want me to wait and let everything sort itself out.

I know I'm not invisible...so this must be a test on whether or not I can find my own answer out there somewhere. :)

The same exact product listed in new search database with no reviews. My review lost in new search cyberspace with different title... I'm going for move to the new and improved name.

Do I win a prize? ;)

Julie
   
carstairs38 Posted: Oct 31 '07,  10:26 am           
Reviews written: 1201
Member since: Oct 03 '05
Post: 157644
RE: ...

Quote: Andyman
When in doubt use the following steps to determine which product to write on. Choose the product:

1) shown highest in the list and/or search results
2) which has an image and merchant deals
3) which already has reviews

#1 should be your priority, though. If you want to move your review to a product that shows up higher in the search results, go right ahead. Just keep in mind that you can't move your review onto a merchant deal (the ones that say "buy it" and have no "write a review" link).

Hope that helps


I have a feeling this answers my question, but I am going to ask it anyway. :)

Over the last few weeks, I have found a number of new products have had multiple identical listings showing up. They've had listings such as www.epinions.com/item, item_1, item_2, etc.

As a rule, I've been searching for the item without a number, putting my review there, and filing a bug report on all the duplicates.

Searching for a few of those items today, I discovered that only one product is listed. Wonderful.

Except, it's one of the item I listed as a duplicate. One of the items only shows item_5 for example.

So, what's the best way to handle this? Be patient and wait for the items to merge? Move my review to the one product that is showing?

I know my reviews are still visable to the outside world. But I'd like them to be viewable to both the outside and the inside world.

Mark
Hide member images Print         
Showing 41-60 of 201 posts Previous  Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next 
Return to top

Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds | Price Comparison UK

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.