Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Learn More! | Sign In   
Home > Message Boards > Cars > General Automotive > Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights
Posts on this Topic   Search in General Automotive   
Showing 1-36 of 36 posts   Back to original view  
Hide member images Print     Start a new topic     Post a Reply
   
hyundai_fan Original Post: May 06 '05,  6:25 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 107
Member since: Jun 01 '02
Post: 16879
Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

What is your opinion on DRL's (Daytime Running Lights?) Do you have them on your car, and if so, what do you like or dislike about them?

On our Camry we have DRLs, and they drive me nuts during sunsets. When I'm going down the road all of a sudden my "real" headlights turn on, then a little ways more they shut off because I hit a "bright spot" and then they turn on again until darkness falls. There's no problem with it, it's just one of those quirks DRLs have with the sensors mounted on the dashboard.

A website called Lights Out absolutely hates them, but they do go a little overboard with the reasons why. In fact, their bias is almost unhealthy. DRLs are just something they have to deal with if they hate them so much.

Another thing that bothers me are those who think that if they don't have DRLs, they must turn on their lights and switch them to high beams. I'm taught to turn on the headlights at all times, so that doesn't bother me, but why high beams?

Overall though, my opinions are purely mixed. On one hand I think DRLs are under-appreciated due to their original purpose but yet they are a hassle to deal with when you don't want them on. Again, what's your opinion on DRLs?

~Scott

   
tch7 Posted: May 06 '05,  8:45 pm (Updated: May 06 '05,  8:52 pm)           Reply
Reviews written: 112
Member since: Jan 19 '03
moderator in Hotels & Travel
Post: 16915
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

Daytime running lights are wonderful. I've never been able to understand why some people hate them so much.

Having something that distinguishes a running/moving car from a parked car makes a surprising difference with safety. I'm a fairly aware driver, but the number of times I've not noticed cars just because they didn't have any sort of lights on is rather high. Never any remotely close calls, but usually these "where the hell did he come from" reactions.

The only slight drawback I see is that they can really make the front of a vehicle look ugly. However, it's perfectly possible to institute DRLs in a design with having them barely noticeable. As for glare like that website you posted talks about, well I've never experienced problems with glare during the daytime. Only time lights bug me is when people have their high-beams on for no reason, or their headlights are pointed in the wrong direction so that they blind you as you drive toward them.

   
drive571 Posted: May 06 '05,  8:55 pm (Updated: May 06 '05,  9:02 pm)           Reply
Reviews written: 138
Member since: Jan 08 '04
Post: 16917
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

I've never understood what the big deal was with DRLs, either. If cars' headlights aren't blinding at night, then how can the "glare" be so unbearable during the day, when one's eyes are used to the brighter ambient light? Anyway, Car & Driver used to make a big stink about them, too. Now they've moved on to bashing hybrid cars...

I've actually come to appreciate DRLs because they compensate for the people who don't turn their lights on when they should--on two-lane highways, in rainy or foggy weather, or at dusk, for example.

I will admit, though, that I don't have any of the vision problems that may affect DRL opponents. If I had astigmatism and couldn't drive at night, DRLs might make it tough for me to drive in daylight, too. Maybe. Then again, if it was that bad, I'd also be completely incapacitated by chrome trim and reverse lights, and I don't see any websites advocating the extermination of them.

-PJ

   
scmrak Posted: May 09 '05,  7:55 am           Reply
Reviews written: 1381
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 17118
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

Quote: drive571
I've actually come to appreciate DRLs because they compensate for the people who don't turn their lights on when they should--on two-lane highways, in rainy or foggy weather, or at dusk, for example.
There's a traffic ordinance here in Illinois that if your wipers are on, your headlights must also be on - not that it makes any difference to some of the locals.

Never had a vehicle with DRLs, but I've driven a few rentals with 'em. I like 'em, because anything that helps another driver see me on the road is A-OK in my book. Considering that some morons can't seem to see my 17-foot long 6-foot high fire-engine red Tacoma, every little bit helps.

-30-

rex
   
hyundai_fan Posted: May 09 '05,  9:45 am           Reply
Reviews written: 107
Member since: Jun 01 '02
Post: 17125
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

Quote: scmrak
There's a traffic ordinance here in Illinois that if your wipers are on, your headlights must also be on - not that it makes any difference to some of the locals.


Couldn't car companies design a system where the headlights turn on when you turn on your wipers (not DRLs, but all the exterior lights--taillights, parking lamps, dash lights etc.)? DRLs were made for countries with lighting deficiencies, so why not use my idea for reasons of complying with the law?

~Scott
   
scmrak Posted: May 09 '05,  10:24 am           Reply
Reviews written: 1381
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 17126
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

Quote: hyundai_fan
Couldn't car companies design a system where the headlights turn on when you turn on your wipers...
I think some MFRs may offer this as an option. Can't see it becoming standard for the industry unless similar laws are adopted by one or more of the larger-population states.

-30-

rex
   
pvreditor Posted: May 10 '05,  9:45 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 17233
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

I have no problem with DRLs either. Virginia also has a regulation about switching on the headlights if its raining, and I think New York has a similar regulation.

I find that different car companies implement DRLs differently. The Ford Focus I'm driving this week (don't know the year yet) has the lights come on slightly dimmed anytime the ignition is switched on. My 2003 Subaru switches on the DRLs only when the parking brake is released. That seems more logical to me but the effect is pretty much the same.

--Bob

   
HollyJahangiri Posted: May 17 '05,  5:59 am           Reply
Reviews written: 16
Member since: Jun 12 '00
Post: 17712
Love 'em

I had them on my 2000 Pontiac Montana. I just bought the 2005 Honda Accord Hybrid, and find that they only come on the Canadian models. Yikes! I have to remember to turn on my headlights now?? I've given my daughter the Montana, so I hope she won't grow up thinking all cars' headlights turn on automatically, or she'll be in for a rude awakening. (Kind of like when they installed self-flushing toilets at the daycare center...)

   
jumperless Posted: May 20 '05,  7:56 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 125
Member since: Jul 30 '01
Post: 18061
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

I like them, my car does not have them but I always turn the headlights on. It's a law in Florida as well that headlights must be on in the rain. But there are plenty who do not realize this.

I notice on some cars, like older Saturns, the DRLs are separate, brighter lights that are too bright for night use. Our old 98 SC2 DRLs were blinding at night until the regular headlights were turned on and the DRLs switched off.

   
pvreditor Posted: May 21 '05,  8:54 am (Updated: May 21 '05,  3:01 pm)           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 18080
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

Quote: jumperless
I like them, my car does not have them but I always turn the headlights on. It's a law in Florida as well that headlights must be on in the rain. But there are plenty who do not realize this.

We have the same law here in Virginia and it was also on the books when I lived in New York. I hate to run the headlights on the Porsche unless I have to (they are pop-ups that cost something like $250 to replace), so I switch on the driving lights and the fog lights when it rains. This gives me bright, easily visible lights in front of my car.

Don't know how the law would rule on that; probably "headlights" means "headlights" and I could get a ticket.

--Bob
   
ed45626 Posted: Oct 21 '05,  12:14 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 1
Member since: Oct 21 '05
Post: 31698
Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

I haven't been able to find, and maybe someone can point them out, studies that show daytime running lights prevent accidents.

I understand their use in far northern latitudes where there is limited daylight -- but what about the US?

It seems most information that I hear is anecdotal -- not to discount that, but someone must have done more extensive studies.

I'm also curious if anyone has calculated the cost to put DRL's on all cars, the legislative costs, etc. involved. An interesting link on 'How Stuff Works' does look at the amount of gas consumed if all cars had DRL's: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question424.htm

Just some thoughts -- not for or against.

   
pvreditor Posted: Oct 21 '05,  12:52 pm (Updated: Oct 21 '05,  2:32 pm)           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 31705
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

Quote: ed45626
I haven't been able to find, and maybe someone can point them out, studies that show daytime running lights prevent accidents.

The following Web page has seven reports cited near the bottom of the page:

www.sav-a-life.com/Drl_intro.htm

There's no question that burning your headlights uses gasoline and slightly reduces gas mileage. It also causes the lights to fail more often, increasing the risk that a headlight will be burned out when you need it most. I guess the question is whether the reduced chance of an accident is worth the expense of running your headlights continuously. From what I saw on the above Web site -- which is strongly in favor of daytime running lights -- the answer is yes.

--Bob
   
tch7 Posted: Oct 21 '05,  8:23 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 112
Member since: Jan 19 '03
moderator in Hotels & Travel
Post: 31740
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

I noticed in Alaska that few vehicles had DRLs, and I'm far more convinced now that they do increase safety. The number of people that drove in crappy weather without any lights on (and usually in grey or white vehicles...) was astounding. They were nowhere near as visible as a vehicle with some sort of lights on, and I'm amazed you don't get.

Having lights on when wipers are on isn't good enough, as it's when you're driving through fog that the lights become more important than ever.

   
windmill007 Posted: Oct 24 '05,  8:32 am (Updated: Oct 24 '05,  8:35 am)           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Oct 24 '05
Post: 31892
Should be an option

Well I for one don't like being forced to run those daylights if I don't want them. I think they make your car look uglier and not cool. I think just running the parking lights should be enouf'. I think some chevys do this but they have beaming parking lights instead which look ugly too. I like my 99 Honda Accord. I leave my parking lights on all the time..unless its night and I need headlights...and they turn off automatically when I get out of my car. When I unlock my doors with the remote either my headlights or my parking lights turn on depending on what I had them set to last. Yes I have the option to run no lights if I wish and I feel every vehicle should have that option. I for one am against those beaming driving lights. Don't really think they help in most situations. Might make it worse with all those headlights beaming you all the time.

   
scmrak Posted: Oct 25 '05,  8:24 am (Updated: Oct 25 '05,  8:24 am)           Reply
Reviews written: 1381
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 31960
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

Quote: pvreditor
There's no question that burning your headlights uses gasoline and slightly reduces gas mileage.
The only place I've seen this assertion is on that IHateDRLs site (but, admittedly, I haven't looked for it much). Should that statement say "very slightly"? I can't imagine that the additional amount of friction caused by running the alternator while the lights are on - assuming that this is where the reduction comes from instead of, say, heating the air in front of the car and making it stickier - amounts to a heck of a lot. Probably a lot less than the idiotic habit of playing vulture so one can get a parking space in the front row at the mall... Anyway, what's the quantitative story as opposed to the qualitative story?

-30-

rex

PS - While on the topic, I'm pretty sure that closing every McDonalds, Taco Bell, Wendy's, Jack-in-the-Box, etc. drivethrough for a month or so would save a heck of a lot more fuel than doing away with DRLs for the next oh, hundred years...


   
pvreditor Posted: Oct 25 '05,  10:23 am           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 31976
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

Quote: scmrak
The only place I've seen this assertion is on that IHateDRLs site (but, admittedly, I haven't looked for it much). Should that statement say "very slightly"? I can't imagine that the additional amount of friction caused by running the alternator while the lights are on - assuming that this is where the reduction comes from instead of, say, heating the air in front of the car and making it stickier - amounts to a heck of a lot. Probably a lot less than the idiotic habit of playing vulture so one can get a parking space in the front row at the mall... Anyway, what's the quantitative story as opposed to the qualitative story?

PS - While on the topic, I'm pretty sure that closing every McDonalds, Taco Bell, Wendy's, Jack-in-the-Box, etc. drivethrough for a month or so would save a heck of a lot more fuel than doing away with DRLs for the next oh, hundred years...


You're no doubt right about the effect of eliminating drive-thru's at fast-food joints.

My assertion that running the lights uses a slight amount of gasoline is based simply on the energy the alternator draws from the engine when the lights are being powered. The energy to power the lights has to come from somewhere and it can only come from the engine's energy source: gasoline. I've actually had a couple of cars in which the idle speed was affected by switching on the lights. I agree that it's a small -- even very small -- consumer of gasoline but lights do use some. You should know that there is no thermodynamic free lunch.

--Bob
   
scmrak Posted: Oct 25 '05,  12:35 pm (Updated: Oct 25 '05,  12:42 pm)           Reply
Reviews written: 1381
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 31994
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

Quote: pvreditor
My assertion that running the lights uses a slight amount of gasoline is based simply on the energy the alternator draws from the engine when the lights are being powered.
But isn't the alternator in the circuit whether the lights are on or not? Excess output from the alternator - that not needed to recharge the battery or run the electrical system - is, I suppose, merely dissipated as heat?

Soooo.... let's see: don't know what the wattage of a pair of headlights is, but let's just arbitrarily say that they draw a total of 500 watts. A gallon of gasoline is approximately 124000 BTU and a Kilowatt hour is 3412 BTU. So one gallon of gasoline yields 36.3 KWH, or 72.6 hours of burning your headlights.

Let's do another calculation: if you drive 60 mph for 72.6 hours, you'll have traveled 4356 miles. If your car gets 30 MPG with the lights off, that's a fuel consumption of 145.2 gallons compared to 146.2 gallons with them on. The net reduction in fuel economy is from 30.000 to 29.795, a percentage reduction of 0.007.

Yep, seems pretty insignificant to me.


-30-

rex

(Who notes that some guy who drives a Corvette claims that the use of the headlights [in ANY car] imposes a load of 7.9 horsepower on the engine. Personally, I think he's full of horsefeathers, because my 35-hp Volkswagen ran almost exactly the same with the lights on as with them off - no 22% reduction in [what passed for] power. I suspect he's made an error in his calculations)

   
pvreditor Posted: Oct 25 '05,  12:45 pm (Updated: Oct 25 '05,  12:46 pm)           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 31995
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

Quote: scmrak
But isn't the alternator in the circuit whether the lights are on or not?


The alternator is being spun all the time that the engine turns. However, an electric load on the alternator will in turn load down the engine. If you spin a gererator/alternator by hand, it will spin freely if there is no electrical load. As soon as you supply a load, the rotor of the alternator will bog down in proportion to that load.

Remember those old bicycle generators that were spun by the side of the bike's tire? If you have the chance to try one of those, try it with the light on and off... you'll quickly see the difference.

Your analysis doesn't take into account the losses sustained in converting the potential energy in gasoline into rotational energy, then converting it again to electricity -- not to mention resistance losses in the car's wires and switches. However, I'm willing to state that the gasoline used by running your headlights is slight. (In fact, I think I already did state that.) However, it is measurable.

--Bob
   
pvreditor Posted: Oct 25 '05,  1:11 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 31997
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

Quote: scmrak
But isn't the alternator in the circuit whether the lights are on or not? Excess output from the alternator - that not needed to recharge the battery or run the electrical system - is, I suppose, merely dissipated as heat?

I missed this the first time.

The alternator only makes electricity as it is needed. It is not a steady-state draw on the engine. If there is no demand for electricity, the alternator will spin nearly freely. Keeping the battery topped up takes only a few milliamps but the headlights probably draw 10 Amps or so; more current will flow if the tail lights and associated lights are on.

I learned that 1 hp = 746 Watts. Switching on the lights in the car will probably draw around 150 to 200 Watts, maybe 1/4 hp. It's not a lot but it is noticable at idle speed on many engines. Running rear window defrosters, wipers, fans and even stereos can get this engine demand to 1 hp.

There is no resistor in a car that is burning off excess power. If there was, it would have to dissipate 1,000 Watts, would be the size of a couple of shoe boxes and would weigh 40 pounds. It would need a lot of air flow, too, unless you wanted to use it for a kiln.

--Bob
   
mkaresh Posted: Oct 25 '05,  1:34 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 538
Member since: Oct 16 '99
moderator in Cars
Post: 32000
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

An earlire poster likely long gone mentioned that without DRLs she'll actually have to turn on her lights. I'm hoping she realizes that the DRLs are only up front. The tail lights must still be turned on.

When GM first introduced DRLs on all its cars they used the headlights. Then everyone complained so for many cars they started using the front parking lights instead.

   
drive571 Posted: Oct 25 '05,  1:53 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 138
Member since: Jan 08 '04
Post: 32006
RE: Are there definitive studies on effectiveness?

Quote: I'm hoping she realizes that the DRLs are only up front...

When DRLs first appeared in the '90s, I remember seeing lots of cars with dim-looking headlights and no taillights at night. You'd think they'd notice the pitch-black instrument panel in front of them...

I'd certainly believe that running the headlights imposes an extremely marginal loss of horsepower. However, a car that's totaled because someone didn't see it turning left makes 0 horsepower.

- P.J.

   
world2give Posted: Jan 19 '06,  9:47 am           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Jan 19 '06
Post: 40260
LIGHTS OUT !!!

I hate daytime running lamps


#1 because when I drive home from the city I have 3 pitch black intersections that I come to... when I approach these crossroads I turn my headlights off for a second to see if I see any lights coming thus affecting my next move.

#2 because I don't like to advertise myself.

#3 I am a good driver... I know when my headlights need to be on for safety

#4 I am annoyed by vehicles with DRL on a nice sunny day therefore I choose not to annoy others who feel the same as I.

#5 headlight wear is impacted if DRL are incorporated into normal driving lights (hi/lo beams).

#6 some manufactures have DRL who come on always so that in a parking lot while their vehicle is running I am being blinded.

#7 some morons drive with only DRL after dark

#8 I like to drive up my driveway with my LIGHTS OUT!!!

#9 When riding at the local lights festival or in a parade, DRL take away from the effect. DRL certainly don't affect my insurance rates (yet)

#10 This country (USA) is supposed to be a free country but DRL are just another item to add to our growing list of freedoms taken away (and the sad part about this is that the government has nothing to do with it. (yet)


DRL are good for one thing and one thing only!

since drivers licences are so easy to get, there are many many bad drivers on the road today many of these drivers are too dumb to realize that headlights are not just so that you can see to drive but that lights are also necessary to be seen in inclement driving conditions and yet I see people driving a dark gray car in the driving rain with no lights.... these are the people who need DRL.

   
tch7 Posted: Jan 19 '06,  6:14 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 112
Member since: Jan 19 '03
moderator in Hotels & Travel
Post: 40344
RE: LIGHTS OUT !!!

Quote: world2give
#1 because when I drive home from the city I have 3 pitch black intersections that I come to... when I approach these crossroads I turn my headlights off for a second to see if I see any lights coming thus affecting my next move.

#3 I am a good driver... I know when my headlights need to be on for safety

These two points seem a little contradictory to me. How is approaching an intersection in pitch black conditions with no lights on safe?

Suppose there is another car with no DRLs and no lights on approaching the intersection at the same time as you, how will you see them? Just as importantly, how will they see you? What if turning your lights off for that second causes you to not see a new regulatory sign?
   
world2give Posted: Jan 21 '06,  7:26 am           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Jan 19 '06
Post: 40682
re,re, lights out

That is a chance I have been taking for about 20 years now and never had any close calls, negative incidents, or seen any new signs..... Thats a chance I'm willing to take because my "check" system works for me and on many occasions this has alerted me to the presence of an approaching vehicle...

OK here is another issue - MOTORCYCLES.... do you remember when motorcycle companies started putting always on lighting on their bikes that was way before the DRL era on vehicles... motorcycles were much easier to see because they stood out due to their lights now they just blend in.

Not that I want to bore anyone BUT- Just yesterday it was 60° & sunny I was sitting in line at a 3 way stop sign... there were about 10 cars ahead of me...as I watched the cars on my left turn right the DRL equipped vehicles were blinding me when they made their turn- especially the cars that incorporate DRL into the high beam.... it was only 3 cars but for an old-schooler like me it was three too many... OK you can tell me not to look at the lights or something... Great suggestion but that is not realistic.... and truthfully I have no problem with someone who turns their lights on every time they start their car... even DRL for someone who really wants that feature because THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT... but I think it's becoming an annoyance epidemic that the feature cannot be overridden by switch then again the first thing I do when I get a new car is disconnect all chimes, beeps, dings, etc... because I am annoyed quite easily:o)

   
world2give Posted: Jan 21 '06,  7:46 am           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Jan 19 '06
Post: 40685
RE: LIGHTS OUT !!!

Quote: tch7
How is approaching an intersection in pitch black conditions with no lights on safe?



The lights go out just long enough to see if there are any approaching headlights... It's not like I sneak up on these intersections....
I have been driving for 24 years now and had one accident when I was 16 and thats it... I don't speed, or tailgate.... I am extremely safe & courteous in all regards of operating a motor vehicle
   
drive571 Posted: Jan 21 '06,  7:19 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 138
Member since: Jan 08 '04
Post: 40805
RE: LIGHTS OUT !!!

I know of no vehicle manufacturers that use the high-beam headlights as DRLs. The people you see with "glaring" headlights have more likely tripped the turn-signal stalk by accident and activated their brights (which, on some models, happens whether the DRLs are on or not).

- P.J.

   
hopewelldunn Posted: Aug 13 '06,  11:00 am           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Aug 13 '06
Post: 70163
drl

i just bought a car with them and dont understand them, like why can;t i leave them off, during the day with no lights on. the dealer tells me they will be on as long as the car is running. is this true? does it hurt your vehicle? i have never had a car with them. thanks for any info you can g ive me.

   
pvreditor Posted: Aug 14 '06,  7:18 am           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 70322
DRL

If your car has daytime running lights (DRL), you can not turn them off. They will be on whenever your car is running. (In some cases, the lights come on when you release the emergency brake or when you shift out of "park.") DRL is intended to make your car more visible and will not otherwise hurt your car. You may burn out the lights a little more often and you will use a tiny bit more gasoline, but those are the only negative effects.

--Bob

   
scmrak Posted: Aug 14 '06,  7:25 am (Updated: Aug 14 '06,  7:25 am)           Reply
Reviews written: 1381
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 70324
RE: drl

Quote: hopewelldunn
i just bought a car with them and dont understand them, like why can;t i leave them off, during the day with no lights on. the dealer tells me they will be on as long as the car is running. is this true? does it hurt your vehicle? i have never had a car with them. thanks for any info you can g ive me.


The very essence of daytime running lights is that they are always on when the engine is running. That's what they mean when they say both "daytime" and "running." As to whether they hurt your vehicle, it depends on what you mean by "hurt."

You will most likely find that your headlights have a reduced lifetime, since they're always on, although most manufacturers attempt to alleviate this problem by running them at reduced brightness - something like 50-60% in most cases.

As discussed above, the load on the car's generation system will have an incremental impact on your overall gas mileage, although since you can't turn them off, it's a "how can you tell?" kind of calculation. The common argument that our country would save NNN gallons of petroleum products every year is usually overstated, and it always neglects to allow for the petroleum products used by emergency vehicles making runs to accidents that might have been avoided with DRL.

After all, the purpose of daytime running lights is to make the vehicle more visible to other drivers and other people on the road (including pedestrians). I've seen many an idiot driving a "road-colored" car in fog, rain, and semi-darkness without lights because s/he's afraid s/he'll forget to turn them off when s/he gets to the office; or simply because s/he figures that "I can see everything so everybody else must be able to see me." Forcing such people to have lights on at all times probably saves a several accidents and a few lives every year, although Darwinists might argue about whether it improves the species to have the "drive-in-the-dark-without-headlights" gene preserved.

So "hurt" the car? It's intended, as I understand it, to reduce the likelihood of accidents, which is probably a "good" thing instead of a "hurtful" thing, at least in the long run.

HTH.

-30-

rex

   
yuppiemobile69 Posted: Sep 30 '06,  10:28 am           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Sep 30 '06
Post: 78806
DRL studies in Canada

The best data is on the Transport Canada websites, where stats compiled in the 80's/90's indicated-as I recall-about a 30% decrease in accidents in two lane marked but physically undivided hwy. head ons..i.e, Trans.Canada Hwy.
For some reason, it concluded, the brain tends to view approaching objects on a long flat sloping road as relatively equal, and searches for peaks or changes diffrerently, i.e less effectively the longer the potential viewing area is in miles/km., so despite wider spaces of the West in particular, these kinds of areas are where we tire, or or brains don't pick out long range objects, even though you'd think a barren landscape would make for easy pickens!!
I can't stand the fact DOT didn't mandate them for US cars, and think, FWIW, that xenon driving lights should be standard, hell be cost, so that I can show I'm coming around corners with an adjustable driving light beam (Lexus and others are incorporating this update on Citroen turning headlights, but the current designs use HID for the DRIVER's benefit, NOT to warn the traffic coming the other way that doesn't see you and then suddenly gets blinded by your massive hot spots of lumens!!
Waiting for LED lights for my forehead to be surgically sub-implanted for easier swimming and oggling!
John

   
drlguy Posted: Oct 15 '06,  6:06 pm (Updated: Oct 15 '06,  6:11 pm)           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Oct 15 '06
Post: 81239
DRL info is found here...

Look at this site for DRL facts:

www.BestDRLs.com

   
scmrak Posted: Jul 17 '08,  7:12 am           Reply
Reviews written: 1381
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 194914
RE: DRL studies in Canada

Quote: pvreditor

   
scmrak Posted: Jul 19 '08,  10:33 am           Reply
Reviews written: 1381
Member since: Sep 27 '00
Post: 195441
RE: DRL studies in Canada

Quote: scmrak

   
pvreditor Posted: Jul 23 '08,  10:29 am           Reply
Reviews written: 407
Member since: May 31 '02
moderator in Cars, Home & Garden, Musical Equipment
Post: 196227
RE: DRL studies in Canada

Quote: yuppiemobile69
...Waiting for LED lights for my forehead to be surgically sub-implanted for easier swimming and oggling!

The idea of a light is not so bad but where will they stick the battery??

--Bob
   
George_Chabot Posted: Aug 22 '08,  9:11 pm           Reply
Reviews written: 1908
Member since: Feb 09 '00
Post: 199147
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

The daytime running lights run your battery down to the point where a five year battery here in the south is probably good for two years.

   
jercha Posted: Jun 11 '09,  8:51 am           Reply
Reviews written: 0
Member since: Jun 11 '09
Post: 228112
RE: Your Opinion On Daytime Running Lights

Most daytime running lights use too much electricity. Most use 100 watts. How many homes leave 100 watt light bulb on during the day or even all night. Try touching a 100 watt bulb and you will get scorched.

They are profitable for manufacturers. I was forced to get DRLs when I upgraded to Leather seating. The DRLs cannot be switched off unless you rewire some circuit board.

Some nights I forget to turn on my headlights my dashboard stay lit up all day with DRLs.

The manufacturer should give you a disable switch and the ability to switch to 10 watt LEDs. LEDs are cool especially on the new AUDIs. I don't mind paying extra for cool LEDs.

Hide member images Print     Start a new topic     Post a Reply
Showing 1-36 of 36 posts   Back to original view  
Return to top

Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds | Price Comparison UK

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.