HomeCars & MotorsportsNew Cars2011 Buick Regal
Read Reviews (2) Compare Prices View Details Write a Review

2011 Buick Regal

Overall rating:  Product Rating: 4.5

Reviewed by 2 users

Write a review

About the Author

mkaresh

mkaresh


mkaresh is a Lead on Epinions in Cars & Motorsports

Epinions Most Popular Authors - Top 10

Reviews written: 561
View all reviews by mkaresh




2011 Regal: would you really rather have a Buick?


by mkaresh: Written: Aug 25, 2010


Product Rating: 4.0 Recommended: Yes 

Pros: Styling, good ride-handling compromise, German feel
Cons: Base four provides marginal power, perhaps too subtle to get noticed
The Bottom Line: Perhaps too subtle, but a very solid contender that's certainly worth a look.


With Pontiac and Saturn gone, Buick must assume a broader role within General Motors, winning over enthusiasts and import-intenders. The first product of this expanded mission: the new 2011 Buick Regal. The Regal began life as the Opel Insignia-it will even be imported from Germany for the first year-and was to be marketed in the United States as the second-generation Saturn Aura. So on paper it checks off all of the right boxes. But is it the right car to make Buick desirable to a whole new group of people?

Buick Regal Styling

In the American context, the new Buick Regal blends. Yes, it's handsome, but the same can be said for other clean, chunkily-proportioned, Audi-influenced sedans. Thanks to a basically curvy shape, the Opel Insignia looks much more like a Buick than the similarly imported Opel Omega looked like a Cadillac, but this isn't saying much. Within the Buick family, the Regal has been stuck with the role of Jan Brady. Those seeking a distinctively styled car that is clearly a Buick will opt to date the family's Marcia, the half-size-larger LaCrosse. 

Inside the 2011 Buick Regal, the story is the same, with a more conventional, more straightforward design than you'll find in the LaCrosse. Materials are better than the GM norm, and are certainly a step or two up from those in the Saturn Aura, but aren't quite up to those in the Acuras and Audis GM hopes to steal buyers from. White stitching on the seats and upholstered door panel inserts and numerous chrome details provide welcome contrast within the "ebony" (i.e. black) interior-though the thick chrome shifter surround might be a bit much. Unlike in the LaCrosse, there is no stitching on the instrument panel. 

The various elements of the instrument panel cohere and flow together much better than they did in the Saturn Aura this car was to replace.  Piano black trim runs along the base of the windshield to trace a continuous arc from door to door and also flows down into the center console from a band that runs mid-level across the instrument panel. For those who find the dark interior overly dark-and many potential buyers likely will, despite the contrasting bits-Buick offers a two-tone cocoa/cashmere interior with faux wood trim.

Buick Regal Room and Comfort

The new Buick Regal's relatively conventional interior design pays functional dividends. Thanks to the car's lower instrument panel and thinner (but still not thin) pillars, it's much easier to see out of the Regal. The shifter is better positioned. And the various controls are easier to reach-though in the Regal as in the button-laden LaCrosse it's often a challenge to find the one you're looking for.

Oddly, while Cadillac no longer offers four-way power lumbar adjustments in the CTS or SRX, Buick offers this feature in both the Regal and the LaCrosse. And yet the Regal's moderately firm front seats aren't especially comfortable, and only a German might find them luxurious. It doesn't help that the headrests are very firm and jut too far forward in the interest of cheap whiplash protection. The bolsters provide some lateral support, but in the GM fashion are too widely spaced for the average driver. The same could be said about the seats in competing cars-it's not easy finding great seats. But seats used to be a Buick focus.

Compared to the Buick LaCrosse, the Regal rides on a four-inch-shorter wheelbase and, at just over 190 inches in length, is nearly seven inches shorter overall. These dimensional differences most impact rear seat room. While the LaCrosse offers 40.5 inches of rear legroom, the Regal provides 37.3, about average for a midsize car. Six-footers will fit, but the flat rear seat cushion is mounted far too low to provide thigh support-blame the fashionably arched roofline. One welcome premium feature: rear air vents.

Jan always was more practical than Marcia. So perhaps it should not come as a surprise that, with 14.2 cubic feet of cargo volume, Regal actually has a slightly larger trunk than the LaCrosse. In both cars GM opted for conventional gooseneck hinges, then fully encased the paths taken by these hinges to yield an especially narrow space. Why? Just to save a few dollars per car? 

Buick Regal Performance

Partly to differentiate the 2011 Regal from the LaCrosse, Buick won't offer the smaller sedan with a V6. The only engine currently available: a 182-horsepower direct-injected 2.4-liter. At 3,600 pounds, the new Regal could stand to lose a few (hundred), but the normally-aspirated four moves two tons (with driver and passenger) well enough in typical around town driving, and without making noises unbecoming a Buick. Most drivers won't feel the need for more power. 

For those who do, a 220-horsepower turbocharged 2.0-liter four will arrive in the fall. Initially, as with the 2.4, a manually-shiftable six-speed automatic that isn't always the smoothest operator is the only transmission. A six-speed manual will be available "for order" with the turbo in late 2010. Don't expect dealers to stock any. The turbo gets a different steering system that adds variable assist. Adaptive shocks with "sport" and "tour" settings will be optional. Farther into the future a Regal GS will combine a 255-horsepower turbo four with a six-speed manual and all-wheel-drive. Buick is seriously pitching this car at enthusiasts. 

To an even greater degree than the specs suggest, the Regal feels more compact and lighter than the LaCrosse. The steering is a little heavier, feels tighter and more precise, and provides more feedback. There's more body roll than in the performance-oriented LaCrosse CXS, but also a smoother, more composed ride. Chassis tuning is a Regal strongpoint-something not typically expected from Buick. When it's taken up a notch with the turbo and manual transmission, the Regal should prove a very fun car to drive. 

Buick Regal Price Comparisons and Pricing

For the first year, because it will be imported from high-cost Germany, the Regal will only be offered in mid-level CXL trim. The starting price of $26,995 jumps to $28,840 when you add the tested car's sunroof and Convenience Package (power passenger seat, rear obstacle detection, AC outlet). A V6-powered LaCrosse CXL is about $2,500 more, according to TrueDelta.com's car price comparison. A similarly-equipped four-cylinder Honda Accord? About $500 less sticker-to-sticker, and about $1,800 less invoice-to-invoice-Buick dealers have much less margin to play with. Adjusting for the Regal's higher content cuts the difference by about $600.

Buick would rather you compare the Regal to the Acura TSX. Do this and you'll find that the Buick is about $1,300 less sticker-to-sticker, but only about $600 less invoice-to-invoice. The Buick has about $200 in additional content. So it appears that the Regal isn't badly priced, but also isn't likely to sell based on price. 

The Regal CXL Turbo will start at $29,495, but aside from the turbo this price will also include the $845 Convenience Package. So the turbo adds a very reasonable $1,655, and will undercut a similarly equipped Volkswagen CC, the closest European competitor, by about $4,000.

Prices change frequently, and differences will vary based on feature level. To quickly generate these and other comparisons with the specific features you want, visit my Web site, TrueDelta.com. (It's the only site that provides true "apples-to-apples" price comparisons.) 

TrueDelta's page for the Regal:

http://www.truedelta.com/models/Regal.php

Buick Regal Conclusions

Overall, the new Regal looks and feels more like an Audi (with VW materials) than a Buick, while being priced midway between Honda and Acura. It's a solid car with large number of standard features and a very good ride-handling compromise. But does it have what it takes to bring people who never saw themselves driving a Buick into Buick showrooms? As much as a German car at Japanese prices has a certain appeal, it's perhaps too subtle. This formula certainly didn't work with the Saturn Astra. More of the LaCrosse's style or of the luxury for which Buick has traditionally been known would help. Or perhaps adding boost will do the trick, at least for those who enjoy driving? I look forward to finding out later this year. 

A Note on Buick Regal Reliability

I cannot practically cover reliability within the context of this review. However, many people are interested in such information, so I've been collecting my own data. Results are posted to TrueDelta.com, with updates every three months. Unlike other sources, TrueDelta clearly identifies what difference it will make if you buy a Buick Regal rather than another vehicle by providing "times in the shop" stats. 

To report results, TrueDelta needs reliability data on all cars--not just the Buick Regal--from people like you. To encourage participation, those who help provide the data receive free access to the site's reliability information. Those who don't have a few minutes a quarter to report on their car can buy a subscription.

Details here:

http://www.truedelta.com/reliability.php

Alphabetized links to my other vehicle reviews can be found on my profile page.
Amount Paid (US$): 30,000
Product Rating: 4.0
Recommended: Yes 

See all Reviews
Back to Top