|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Well, it isn’t. (Reply to this comment)
by lammet
“…King Lianedes's son doesn't quite do too much. I was waiting for the ending were I thought that his son might grow up and become a great warrior-king like his father and plot revenge against the Persians. But I guess that that's not historical fact and that probably why Fraqnk Miller didn't put it in the novel.”
No, that’s not historical fact, but that’s not why Frank Miller did not put it in his novel. If Miller was aiming for historical accuracy he wouldn’t have written/drawn the book he did. This movie simply adds animation to it -and it consequently abounds in gross distortions of fact. I guess for a great many viewers accuracy doesn’t matter, it certainly doesn’t seem to bother you seeing as you call Leonidas “Lianedes” and you report the music score as Classical when in fact it is Rock. Numerous other inaccuracies are to be found in your review. All in all, it isn’t helpful in my opinion.
Moreover, a review is a literary piece in its own right and as such has to respect basic grammatical / syntactical rules. I noticed too many mistakes here.
Thank you for reading.
-Vasilis
|
Feb 03 '08
3:25 am PST
|
|
|
|
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.