HP Photosmart 320: Money Well Spent
Written: Jun 30 '03 (Updated Jul 01 '03)
|
Product Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
 |
|
| Durability: |
 |
|
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
| Photo Quality: |
 |
|
| Shutter Lag |
 |
|
|
Pros: TFT screen,, expandability in memory, viewfinder
Cons: none that I can think of
The Bottom Line: Once again, I would recommend this product to the enthusiast on a budget.
|
|
|
| munky_3000's Full Review: Hewlett Packard Photosmart 320 Digital Camera |
I know that most people who view this review already know the technical specifications (2.1 MP, 4x digital zoom, etc.). So I will put all this in layman's terms and spare the tech talk. I do digital photography as a hobby I have tried other digital cameras before. The HP Photosmart 320 is the best digital camera that I have owned. I bought it with a 64MB SD Card at Wal-Mart for somewhere around $200 ($150 for the camera). The next four days, I put this camera through the gauntlet at a music festival: taking more than 300 still photos and video clips. The pictures and video were of such quality, people were asking to buy copies of the cd that I loaded my pictures/videos on. Everything from taking pictures to loading them on my computer has been a breeze. For the fella on a budget, I would highly recommend this camera.
P.S. I don't know what the other people were talking about by their camera eating batteries. I used the same set of batteries almost non-stop for 2-3days!
Recommended:
Yes
Amount Paid (US$): 150 This Camera is a Good Choice if You Want Something... Flexible Enough for Enthusiasts
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID: munky_3000
|
|
Reviews written: 2
Trusted by: 0 members
|
|
|