This is how I spell “A little sincerity wouldn’t hurt”
Written: Apr 23 '08 (Updated Apr 23 '08)
|
Product Rating:
|
|
|
Pros: Los Campesinos! are cooler than you.
Cons: They feel the need to make you feel like shit for it.
The Bottom Line: From one hipster douchebag to another: Can't we all just get along? Also, your music rocks, but your attitude sucks.
|
|
|
| headlessparrot's Full Review: Hold on Now, Youngster... by Los Campesinos! |
Allow me to explain a pet theory which is only tangentially related to my understanding of the Welsh septet Los Campesinos! (thats Spanish for the peasants) and their debut LP, Hold On Now, Youngster. It goes as follows, that the ultimate embodiment of egotism (and/or narcissism) in rock and roll occurs when successful artists get their very own label imprint, and immediately proceed to sign bands that sound exactly like themselves. Limp Bizkits Fred Durst is the easiest target for this but Fred Durst is an easy target for almost any kind of criticism. The most obvious example today, though, is probably Fall Out Boys Pete Wentz, who ran right out and signed Panic! At The Disco (or Panic At The Disco!; Im not sure where theyre placing the exclamation mark these days), despite (or more likely because) theyre being the exact same band. Lest you think Im picking on the obvious marks, Ill concede and this is actually nearer to my point that its something that even truly great bands are guilty of, if only on a smaller scale. Even Broken Social Scene, that paragon of indie virtue, has used their self-administrated label (Arts & Crafts) to sign a bevy of collaborators who sound just like themselves. In many respects, The Most Serene Republic (Arts & Crafts first recruitment from outside of the original collectives ranks) is their nerdy, Dungeons & Dragons alter ego, the mathletes to Broken Social Scenes laidback stoners.
Which brings me to Los Campesinos! Its very tempting to categorize the most recent addition to the Arts & Crafts roster as Broken Social Scenes twee-as-fuck cousin similar aesthetic sensibility, but a lot quirkier, with no one being quite sure whether those eccentricities stem from being foreign, or just from being weird. This is the verbose way of saying, in any event, that I really like Los Campesinos!, but Im unclear as to why. Actually, thats not entirely accurate: I know why I really like Los Campesinos!, but part of me simply loathes myself for doing so. Moreover, I like their full-length debut coming just months on the heels of an introductory EP, Sticking Fingers Into Sockets, which showcased a few of the same songs but I have reservations about it that reflect an ambivalence which has been lacking in the near unanimous praise that Hold On Now, Youngster has received. I just cant bring myself to give it my full endorsement (yet).
The truth is that its not surprising that Hold On Now, Youngster has received such glowing endorsements (a median score of 81 on Metacritic suggests that it will find a home on at least a few year-end lists). It has all the hallmarks of a beloved album big-hearted, quirky, complex, musically lush, lyrically dense, energetic, eccentric, and so on. And its true that Hold On Now, Youngster is all of these things (and maybe more).
Gareth Campesinos voice may be my lone objective criticism of the band: I like unconventional voices, but Gareths delivery a bafflingly unappealing blend of yelping, nasal, and whiny is just too much. But more subjectively, I have a whole host of issues that complicate my feelings toward the band. Mind you, Im not suggesting that Hold On Now, Youngster isnt good, or even great Im fully prepared to admit that my ambivalence toward it is not reflective of some languishing flaw that no one before me has recognized. I like the album enough to know that thats not the case. And I know, furthermore, that I should like the album even more than I do, because its true that it does linger on all of those critical buzzwords. What I am suggesting if I am suggesting anything is that in celebrating Los Campesinos!, critics have glossed over (or even celebrated) some of their more problematic tendencies, both musically and ideologically. Hold On Now, Youngster poses a problem, because its difficult for me to go against the critical consensus when Im struggling so mightily to verbalize exactly why I feel differently. Its compounded by the fact that I can see exactly where the glowing praise is coming from, and that I find myself wanting to like it more than I do. And maybe this is just like Destroyer (the full-time project of part-time New Pornographer Dan Bejar), who I appreciate more in theory than in practice. But whatever the case, I feel compelled to write (as I often am), if only to clarify my own feelings.
Because and Im prepared to get ripped to shreds for this Los Campesinos! sound to my admittedly untrained ears an awful lot like that other, aforementioned exclamation mark-friendly band, Panic At The Disco!. Not unmistakably so, but a close enough affinity exists to raise questions about why one is so readily embraced while the other is so haphazardly dismissed. Ill even admit that this is something Im guilty of. The very fact that Im willing to return to Hold On Now, Youngster for a second look while my distaste for Panic At The Disco! knows no limits suggests that Im a victim of the same thinking. But the truth, I think, is that the groups are ultimately pretty different. Even if I am the one making the initial comparison, I think multiple listens dont bear it out; the easy comparison is not always the right one. Hold On Now, Youngster exhibits an almost pop-punk sensibility thats easy to latch onto, but its level of complexity and hyperactive spasticity suggests the true influences are found in the realm of twee (Belle & Sebastian) and indie rock (labelmates Broken Social Scene). Indeed, Hold On Now, Youngster musically synthesizes the best of many worlds, marrying the precocious with the chaotic resulting in densely layered instrumental shapes (think Broken Social Scenes Almost Crimes) that still sound, somehow, pretty fucking adorable.
But that doesnt mean that Los Campesinos! arent inviting comparisons. Which is a silly and shallow thing to criticize a band for, but which I will posit leads to a more significant point about the way Los Campesinos! operate. The bands propensity for exclamation marks and circuitously longwinded song titles (see This Is How You Spell HAHAHA, We Destroyed The Hopes And Dreams Of A Generation Of Faux-Romantics for Hold On Now, Youngsters most viscerally painful example), and even their general sound are almost knowingly evocative of Fall Out Boy and/or Panic At The Disco!. But lead Campesinos! Gareth has gone on record as suggesting that you can identify the morons as the ones who call their penchant for lengthy song titles and exclamation marks as Fall Out Boy-esque rather than Ballboy or Ten Grand-esque. So I suppose that Im a moron. Nevertheless, my issue with this appropriately derisive defence is that Los Campesinos! are pretty much dangling a carrot by inviting these comparisons and then pulling them away at the last moment. They know how obscure Ballboy and Ten Grand are (only one of the two even has a Wikipedia page, for what its worth), so when someone calls them on the obvious if somewhat superficial similarities, they can just snatch back the carrot and revel in their holier-than-thou hipsterdom. The problem is that doing so doesnt change the fact that there are comparisons to be made for reasons that move beyond a love of punctuation and titular verbosity.
My point: ultimately, the problem is less about the similarities (because they dont hold up to scrutiny) than it is about the bands insular hipster disingenuousness. The net result is that its not possible to take Hold On Now, Youngster at face value, to listen to it openly, and to take it at for what it is without feeling like the joke is on you. That disingenuousness turns a set of eleven otherwise chaotically beautiful and sweetly smart songs into a forty-one minute celebration of hipster douchebaginess, self-conscious referentiality, and what it means to try too hard. Even their name each of the groups seven members uses the Campesinos! (exclamation intact) surname becomes a farce: is it a tribute to the Ramones? Is it a tribute to a band more obscure than the Ramones? Is it just supposed to be cute? Is it ironic? It becomes impossible to tell, and one wonders whether the group is just waiting for someone to make the logical leap to the Ramones before theyre laughed out of the room for being morons (because obviously its not a tribute to the Ramones, that would be too obvious). The image-consciousness here is so pervasive that its difficult to appreciate Hold On Now, Youngster on its own merits. It is as though no one told the group that even being signed to Arts & Crafts in the first place is more or less a free pass to a lifetime of indie credibility. If theyd have done so, it would have given Los Campesinos! free reign to drop the snark and emphasize what makes them so great anyway. Instead, all theyve really done is upped the levels of irony and hipster snark to a embarrassing levels of near self-parody.
Dont get me wrong, Im all for irony and snark theyre my own personal defence mechanisms against authenticity. But theyre modes that dont translate well to music in large doses, precisely because music is at its best when it is at its most earnest. And sincerity and irony are (for the most part) anathema to one another, thus making it impossible to read anything really compelling or insightful into Hold On Now, Youngsters more self-reflexively derisive lyrical tangents. The music is ecstatically wonderful I can count on few fingers artists who incorporate the violin and the glockenspiel into their regular sonic arsenal, and do it without sounding like theyre doing it just for the sake of doing it but so much of the lyrical content is reducible to hipster references that will be dated in five years (Knee Deep At ATP) and predictable satirizations of indie pops soul-baring sincerity (the non-album single The International Tweexcore Underground).
Its almost comedic that Los Campesinos! are so ready to mock others earnestness when theyre so plainly uncomfortable with showing their own especially given that when they do betray a hint of unaffectedness, it pretty much illustrates how far off-base the shallowness of their satirized vision is. Theres an interesting parallel, I think, to be made with another indie rock band, the Weakerthans, whose conscious lack of irony have damned them to middling reviews from the same critics that have spent 2008 fawning over the disingenuous irony of Los Campesinos!. I wrote of the collective indifference toward the Weakerthans that this [hipster] audience has a difficult time taking Samson and his band at face value, and so assume the worst
Theres no room left for the possibility that the Weakerthans are instead just the earnest yield of a likeminded artist
Disliking [them] is an easy, knee-jerk reaction that illustrates, I think, the hipster fear of addressing ones own insecurities. If you can only appreciate things on an ironic level, after all, you can never experience anything genuine. The overwhelmingly positive critical response toward Hold On Now, Youngster, to me, illustrates the other side of this coin the celebration of a record for what should, by all rights, be a deficiency. I could understand these positive reviews if they focused on the flawless arrangement of the albums compositions (seriously, glockenspiel!), or its gleefully taut nervous energy (and some have). But that so many have cheered on even basked in Hold On Now, Youngsters deliberate snobbery is considerably more troubling.
(Did I mention that I cant stand Gareth Campesinos! voice? Because I cant. I will concede, however, that Los Campesinos! female vocalist, Aleksandra, is by contrast pretty much beyond reproach.)
Anyway, the most depressing thing is that theres a lot of good to be had, if it werent couched in such self-defeating sentiments. Indeed, Hold On Now, Youngsters best moments (although musically, theyre all pretty great) are its most sincere. It should be plainly obvious that the band members are, in their heart of hearts, dorks and when that sensibility comes through unadulterated, things are just swell. To quote Pitchfork Medias review, which is still at least partially correct: Los Campesinos! pack their songs with lyrical specificity, only their lives are apparently full of internet surfing, indie fandom, and absurd humour. "Stick with the imprints / With the hieroglyphics that the fan club sent us," Gareth Campesinos! hollers with every exclamation point in his young being on "Broken Heartbeats Sound Like Breakbeats", which claps into an Aleksandra Campesinos!-sung chorus about Spiderman.
Comic book fandom and pop culture references (for a fun game, count the references to The Breakfast Club, K Records, and LiveJournal), though, apparently arent hip enough, because Hold On Now, Youngster ultimately descends, before long, into a morass of irony and sarcasm that makes it impossible to sort the serious from the hipster posturing. It is as though the septet is uncomfortable with their bookish dorkiness, and feels the need to disguise any trace of earnestness with a slathering of ironic self-effacement and crude disdain of others. Thus, we have lines like I spent the last seven years perched on the edge of my bed / Scratching I am incredibly sincere into my forearm, (
And We Exhale And Roll Our Eyes In Unison) which are hilarious in isolation, but tedious when they set the tenor for an entire album. Even that reference to The Breakfast Club (on We Are All Accelerated Readers) is a loaded gun of detached irony: And no more conversations about what Breakfast Club character youd be / Id be the one that dies. When informed that no one dies, the appropriate response becomes Well then whats the point? On You! Me! Dancing! Gareth snidely observes And its sad that you think that theyre all just scenesters / (And even if we were, its not the scene youre thinking of).
Maybe Im just frustrated. Or maybe Im just being too harsh, because nestled between the obnoxiousness, as Ive already mentioned, there is still some wonderful lyricism, and some nuanced observation. When he drops the veneer of casual indifference, Gareth reveals the heart of an author, spinning stream-of-conscious narratives and weaving extended metaphors in a startlingly literary manner: This Is How You Spell HAHAHA, We Destroyed The Hopes And Dreams Of A Generation Of Faux-Romantics is almost worth the intolerable refrain for its verses, which are rendered in such immaculate metaphorical detail I notice the goosebumps on your arms, millions / And whether it's because of the numbers of hours spent laid facedown on my bed listening to / White noise, or, well, obviously it's not, I somehow manage to translate them from Braille. He adds, in continuation, The trails on your skin spoke more to me than the reams and reams of half finished novels you'd / Leave lying all over the place. Knee Deep At ATP, elsewhere, heightens the slow-burning tension of its melancholic violin swells with the (for once) dead-on observation that They said its not what you like, its what youre like as a person. It occurs to me that Los Campesinos! would be well-served in reflecting on their own lyricism here because Hold On Now, Youngster is marred by its being more interested in credibility than genuineness. Theres a balance to be struck between irony and earnestness; Hold On Now, Youngster misses it but I will concede that theres hope theyll ultimately get it right. If what theyre doing now, that is, is explicitly wrong. Maybe it isnt. Your mileage may vary, depending on your tolerance for oblique self-importance.
Im not sure whether its fortunate or unfortunate that its still hard to dislike Los Campesinos! in spite of their asshole-ishness. And you can chalk that up to its joyous instrumental accoutrements, its gleeful energy, melodic abandon, and affection for loosely organized musical chaos. Multi-voice harmonies, boy-girl lyrical duels (prominently featuring Aleksandra Campesinos!, who I rather wish was the bands full-time vocalist), thickly glazed layers of instruments (guitar over synth over bass over violin over glockenspiel), and a complete lack of inhibition point to the sheer euphoric joy of Los Campesinos! music, something that could never be fully deflated by the lyrical distance of its hipster indifference no matter how hard they might try.
The snark doesnt make Hold On Now, Youngster any less brilliant in the temporal sense. Outside of those isolated moments of lyrical clarity, though, its concerns are so petty that I cant see much use for the album outside of the here and now. Except, maybe, as a historical document of hipster douchebaginess (douchebaggery?) in the year 2008. And, maybe, of how a band can get one thing so right and something else so glaringly wrong. If Los Campesinos! ever figure out that their insular insincerity is only a barrier to appreciating an otherwise incredible and incredibly inimitable band, theyll go even further than they already have. Which is a scary thought, because for all its self-absorption, and for all the ways that its image-conscious subtext grates on me, Hold On Now, Youngster might still end up being one of the best records of 2008. So maybe I am ready to give Hold On Now, Youngster my full endorsement. I merely reserve the right to criticize its shortcomings while lauding its greatness.
I demand my cake, and I wish to eat it as well. So the real moral of the story is that Im not above cognitive dissonance.
Recommended:
Yes
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID: headlessparrot
|
- Top 1000 |
|
Member: Bryan Jansen
Location: Ontario, Canada
Reviews written: 171
Trusted by: 174 members
About Me: Are you gonna bark all day, little doggy, or are you gonna bite?
|
|
|