Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Learn More! | Sign In   
           
HomeElectronicsTelescopesMeade LX90 (08109031) (500 x 203mm) Telescope
Opinion Summary
Great optics, highly portable GoTo telescope
by gjb49 | Jul 22 '04
Pros: Quality optics, Easy to set up GoTo function is essential
Cons: GoTo only works if properly aligned, which can be a problem.

Return to opinion


OVERALL RATING
Product Rating: 5.0



Have something to say?
Write your own comment on this review!
Comments on Great optics, highly portable GoTo telescope" (2 total)  
  Comment Sorted by
Date Written
Re: Viewing comparisons (Reply to this comment)
by gjb49
Over the years I have viewed through refractors, reflectors (Newtonian), Schmidt Cassegrain and Maksutov telescopes.

Basically, it comes down to this: The job of a telescope is to gather light. The larger the diameter, the more light; smaller the diameter, less light. The only differences I have seen in the different types of telescopes are: Refractors have more contrast and no diffraction spikes, Newtonians have diffraction spikes.

I have looked at the same object on the same night using all the different types of telescopes and generally the largest telescope (usually a Newtonian) gave the best view.

No matter what Astro Physics says, the view of through a 20" Newtonian will show more detail than a 9" refractor.
Feb 08 '05
5:45 am PST

Viewing comparisons (Reply to this comment)
by grassyknoll
I would have liked to have heard your thoughts on details of plants and galaxies as seen through the cassegrain versus the reflectors.
Feb 06 '05
11:53 am PST
   

Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds | Price Comparison UK

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.