|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Re: How does SR-600 stand before Denon AVR-1803? (Reply to this comment)
by neilkn
The Denon 1803 won out in our opinion. And we have been extremely happy with our Denon since day 1. On a side note, a friend had an older HK which broke down, an internal fuse blown. It spent over a month in the HK repair center, was returned to him, only to break again with a week's use. Sending it back in, it was replaced with the 225, but again took a few weeks before the determination to replace it completely was made. He was out of a unit to use for a few months overall. Nice of them to replace it with a newer model than he had, but a lengthy process.
|
Apr 03 '03
8:18 am PST
|
|
How does SR-600 stand before Denon AVR-1803? (Reply to this comment)
by gottum_m
That was an excellent comparison with the HK-225. I am planning to upgrade my home theatre from a Pioneer to an up-scale receiver and was considering Yamaha, Harmon Kardon, Onkyo, and Denon. I found Yamaha and HK to be lot more expensive for similar features. I am now thinking of Obkyo SR-600 or Denon AVR-1803. You did not mention anything about Denon in your review. Did you find something wrong with Denon during your research?
Thanks
Murali
|
Apr 02 '03
11:40 am PST
|
|
Re: Very Good but one possible omission (Reply to this comment)
by Absolut
This is true. However, A/B speakers is not considered a second zone because it still part of themain amplifier. NOtice that if you are running a DVD in Dolby Digital and switch on the B channel, you lose your back speakers and in effect losing the Dolby Digital. Is this waht you meant?
|
Oct 23 '02
1:07 pm PDT
|
|
Very Good but one possible omission (Reply to this comment)
by neilkn
An excellent review. We are extremely happy with our new Onkyo TX-SR600 Receiver. The one omission is that the TX-SR600 does have a built-in second zone for two front speakers in another room and the option to enable A, B, or both A & B speakers.
|
Oct 20 '02
10:44 am PDT
|
|
|
|
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.