What's in a Name--if it means spending more?
Written: May 01 '00 (Updated May 02 '00)
|
Product Rating:
|
|
|
Pros: feature-loaded; adaptable appearance; very portable; decent reception on most service types
Cons: hidden additional costs; lacking standard, practical features
|
|
|
| Stephi's Full Review: Nokia 6160 Cell Phone |
As a cellular saleswoman, I've seen the good, the bad, and the extremely ugly--as far as cell phones go. Frankly, I've found that Nokia's products--specifically, the popular 5100/6100 series--are not all they're cracked up to be.
Nokia has made its name by appealing to a sense of style and status. From interchangeable faceplates to built-in calculators, calendars and games--they've got the fashion column covered. The slim design and internal antenna maximize portability. The infrared lens on the 6100 series has proven to ensure optimal reception.
The label itself speaks volumes to the typical layman, making Nokia products easy to sell to just about anyone. However, when I have a customer stride into my store, asking about products and accessories for a “No-KEE-uh” (correct pronunciation: NO-kee-uh), I have to wonder how much they really bothered to learn about their phone before they plunked down the cash.
Why am I not impressed? These misguided individuals have spent their hard-earned money on a brand name, and they will have to continue to spend money on batteries, belt clips, cases, and hands-free kits--all before their phone can have the practical features which come standard on almost every other phone on the market today.
The vibrating capability, for instance, which comes standard on Motorola, LGIC, and Audiovox models, cannot be attained with a Nokia phone until a vibrating battery is purchased, ranging from $49-$79. Nokia also offers a 30-day lithium-ion battery, but that doesn't come standard with the phone, either--another $69-$89.
There is also the popular light-up antenna--which is one of many "after-market" products leaching off of Nokia's reputation. Not only is it extremely difficult to interchange (done it), but reception is also significantly reduced, and proper reception cannot be regained, even by replacing the original antenna.
Many states are now passing laws requiring hands-free driving kits, and though an expensive, permanent installation is no longer the only option, Nokia is one of the only phones without the universal 2.5mm headset jack. Instead, the consumer is forced to first purchase a specific attachment which, if he is able to find one, will cost him $20-$30. Only then is he able to select his preference between a full headset, a tiny earpiece, or any of the variations available for a comfortable fit--this, of course, also costs money. Then there are the more expensive options, such as the Navigator by CCM, which provides a speakerphone-type setup. The Nokia model goes for about $79.
The Nokia 5100/6100 series come with a clever slot in the back for a swivel clip--quite convenient until the plastic panel where the clip is held gives way, leaving the feature, the phone, and the consumer appearing to be not-so-clever.
In general, the average consumer may pay well below the cost of a new Nokia 5100/6100 series model, and not have to spend more until he is ready to purchase a new phone--a point to keep in mind the next time a salesperson starts his pitch on the latest "No-KEE-uhs".
Recommended:
No
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID: Stephi
|
|
Reviews written: 1
Trusted by: 2 members
|
|
|