This page is based on my experience at MIT at the undergraduate school, as opposed to the graduate school, which is a very different environment. In particular, undergraduates often arrive needing both social and intellectual development, whereas graduate students more often want a productive working environment. As one might expect, MIT is much better at providing the latter than the former.
The broad overview
When I was a high school senior, over a decade ago, I was excited to get my acceptance letter to MIT. My other choices were also eminent schools, but I already had decided on MIT. In retrospect, I should have visited these schools, but couldn't afford the airfare, and thought the visits were unnecessary anyway. I felt fantastically fortunate just to be admitted - MIT was one of the best schools in the country - what could possibly go wrong?
When I got to MIT, things went very well at first. My freshman year was everything I'd hoped - fun, eventful, even educational. I met smart, creative, and funny people, did well academically, and picked a major (computer science). In my sophomore year, some problems appeared: I started to lose interest in computer science, and started to pull away socially from the overwhelming preponderence of science/math/engineering majors around me. I didn't recognize these warning signs for a while because my increasing social isolation seemed normal relative to the many social phobics around me, and also because my grades were quite good despite my lack of interest. Only later would I realize that my troubles were tied to the fact that my interests were beginning to expand beyond equations and computers. Despite my puzzlement about what was lacking in my life, I instinctively knew I wasn't in the right place, so as graduation neared, I hunkered down, finished my coursework, and got out. The day I left MIT was one of the most exhilarating of my life, and to this day, I deeply regret the fact that as a high school senior, I did not visit the schools that accepted me, and did not seriously think about my life priorities and whether MIT's narrow focus was the best way to fulfill them. Although a lot of my Star-Trek obsessed classmates thrived on MIT's uniquely oddball culture, I did not turn out to be one of them. I also underestimated the degree to which my interests would expand from age 18 to age 22.
Academics
Aspiring humanities majors aren't likely to consider MIT, and probably won't be reading this review. But even aspiring scientists need to ask whether they want to be immersed so quickly in an environment that downplays non-technological aspects of the world. If you have interests in art, politics, public service, social science, etc, you should consider schools other than MIT, even if you plan to major in science. More critically, if you don't have those interests, but think you might someday, you also should also question whether MIT is appropriate. MIT won't stop you from pursuing broad interests, but you will have to swim against the tide, and chart your own course with few role models to guide your way.
As others have noted, MIT is a difficult place to acquire and develop broad interests. I knew that coming in. But what I didn't expect was the degree to which my own interests would expand over 4 years. I was a math/science nerd in high school, but as I drew closer to finishing my degree, I became more and more aware that I was in the wrong place. I was more and more irritated that MIT not only downplays humanities, but actually disparages those areas of study. I found myself offended that MIT students and faculty incessantly bash that proudly diverse (and humanistic) school up the street called Harvard. It's a bit of a blood sport.
Not until I was leaving did I realize how strange it was that MIT has only one humanities department (with some very eminent faculty, I should add), into whose sub-departments are stuffed all available subjects, such as music, philosophy, literature, etc. To add insult to injury, this one overburdened department, like all others at MIT, is mainly referred to on campus by its catalog number, "21". Of the hundreds of people I knew as an undergraduate, only 4 were outright humanities majors, though many more did choose to minor in these subjects. Nonetheless, whole areas of academic life are either missing or severely atrophied at MIT. As a freshman, I didn't understand why this should matter. After I left, I realized it was a crying shame.
I want to be very clear that there is no deception on MIT's part: the school is exactly what it says it is, a science and technology school, with all else taking a back seat. The main culprit in my decision to attend MIT was that I did not understand my own interests, and how they would change as I got older. My motivation in writing this review is not to blame MIT, but to warn aspiring applicants about the dangers of narrowing ones horizons too fast, too soon.
Ironically, MIT's curriculum does make conscious efforts to integrate science and humanities (e.g. their "Science Technology and Society" program), and there are many individuals who bridge the gap successfully. In my case, I sought out cross-registration at Harvard and Wellesley. Getting to class was hard and inconvenient, but also enriching and rewarding. I also did some very meaningful volunteer work - again, not the norm but still very rewarding.
But in the end, MIT is a technical school for technically minded students; other outlooks are lacking or diminished, despite everyone's best intentions. Although this all seems obvious now, it wasn't clear when I was a high school senior: at that time, I had never met an MIT graduate, nor did I appreciate how much people can change as they mature.
Social life
Unfortunately, a lot of MIT undergraduates are more comfortable around equations than people. At most colleges, people like that are counterbalanced by those with the opposite bias, otherwise known as "normal". At MIT, this counterweight is greatly reduced. Although you will find plenty of social interaction at MIT, a lot of it revolves around role-playing games, science fiction TV shows, or drinking at fraternities. If those are your hobbies, you'll feel right at home. If not, you may feel out of place.
When I was there, the ratio of men to women was about 2 to 1, making the dating scene a bit slow. Fortunately, the men/women ratio is almost equal now, but the lopsided range of interests and personalities is still a problem.
MIT attracts a lot of unusually introverted students. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with them, but many of these undergrads simply prefer to keep to themselves, or are extremely awkward. I do believe that a high percentage of my classmates were borderline Asperger's cases. Of course, there are people like this everywhere, but at other schools, they are balanced out by people with the opposite orientation. At MIT, there are enough social phobics to create a self-perpetuating deficit. And with the benefit of hindsight, it's sadly apparent that these deficits cause problems for years after leaving school. Many of the socially challenged undergraduates I knew are, years later, missing out on career, personal, and romantic opportunities. Of course people eventually can and do learn social skills, but the echo-chamber of like-minded people makes it slower and harder.
The net result of this environment is that by my senior year, I became seriously depressed for the first and only time in my life. Somehow, I managed to finish my classes and get my degree. After about a year of reorientation, I developed alternate plans for my life and moved on.
Looking back
In retrospect, there were many good things about MIT. A lot of my classmates had senses of humor that kept me sane. One of them became my significant other, against all odds. I managed to do some volunteer work that was highly meaningful to me. My MIT bachelor's degree also got me into graduate school. Overall, I channeled my distress into a desire to learn more about what is really important in life. These are good things.
But I also believe very strongly that MIT's narrow focus delayed my development as a complete human being. I also think my bout of depression would have been avoided, or handled better, in a more balanced environment. If there was one thing I would have done differently, I would have visited all the other colleges that accepted me. Doing so might have opened my eyes to the different environments and educational philosophies at different schools. I didn't have the money for airfare, but in retrospect, I could have borrowed it.
MIT's high suicide rate
I would like to make one last point: that MIT's single-minded focus is more than just a inconvenient nuisance.
About a decade ago, the Boston Globe examined MIT's suicide rate using historical data going back to the 1960s. MIT's undergraduate suicide rate turned out to be about 20 per 100,000 people per year, triple the rate of other undergraduate universities (which has been estimated at 7.5 suicides per 100,000 per year), and 38% higher than its nearest neighbor, Harvard. The MIT administration subsequently denied this, citing a lower rate of around 10 per 100,000 per year. While technically correct, this number is obtained by including MIT graduate students, whose suicide rate was unusually low. If we compare only undergraduates, MIT's rate clearly outpaced other universities. (For the record, the persistent rumors that Cornell has a high suicide rate aren't accurate - its rate is a very low 4.3 per 100,000 students per year.)
I have not been able to find more recent statistics, though MIT has improved their psychiatric services, in response to some widely publicized suicides. So things might have gotten better since I left. Regardless, you should visit the school in person to judge its environment for yourself, and you should borrow the money if you don't have it - it's that important.
The bottom line
As I mentioned above, there are those who thrive on MIT's unique culture. If you are obsessed with role playing games, Star Trek, or computer operating systems, MIT will be heaven like nowhere else. But if, for lack of a better expression, you're more like a normal human being, you may feel out of place. One way out is to cross-register with other Boston schools, like Harvard and Wellesley, but most of your contacts will still be the people on campus. Getting exposure to a broader range of ideas and opinions will be difficult.
-------------------------------------
By the way, Epinions has the wrong logo for MIT. The boat-like logo on this page is for the Massachusetts Maritime Academy, not MIT. I'm sure you were wondering all about that.
Recommended: No
Read all 43 Reviews
|
Write a Review