Princeton GMAT course is a waste of time
Written: Dec 28 '06
|
Product Rating:
|
|
|
Pros: The only pro for PR is their flexible schedule.
Cons: Hopeless training materials; pathetic instructors; terrible prep course for the GMAT. Thumbs up MLIC.
The Bottom Line: Princeton Review is not going to help anyone wanting to get a score of better than 700. If your target is 700 or above, choose MLIC GMAT course.
|
|
|
| mbanobigdeal's Full Review: Princeton Review GMAT Course |
I took the Princeton Review course and found it insulting and a waste of my money. Firstly, the company (PR) used instructors who were clueless and were repeating "talking points" no matter what the question was (sort of like politicians). Secondly, their materials were meant for "Joe Idiot", not for a person who is serious about getting a score of better than 700. Their materials did not cover some of the questions I came across on the actual GMAT test. I was so mad at Princeton Review when I was in the middle of taking the test that I wanted to see them shut down. I canceled my GMAT score and took a prep course with a company (previously never heard of them) called MLIC. To my relief, when I received their pre-program course materials, I was asked to go through some of the stuff I actually encountered on the GMAT. MLIC GMAT course helped me get a score of 710. I strongly recommend the MLIC GMAT course. You can check out their programs at http://www.mlicets.org/gmat/gmat-prepcourses.html
I vehemently recommend MLIC course for the GMAT to anyone thinking of PR course. PR is a total waste of your time and precious greenback.
Recommended:
No
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID:
mbanobigdeal
|
|
Reviews written: 1
Trusted by: 0 members
|
|
|
- Add to My Yahoo!: 
- Add to Google Homepage: 
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.