Not much better than a disposable
Written: Feb 17 '01
|
Product Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
 |
|
| Durability: |
 |
|
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
|
|
Pros: Compact, Flash flips up, lightweight, easy to use
Cons: Small viewfinder, does not seem very durable, not much better than a disposable camera
The Bottom Line: I would not reccommend this camera, you're better off buying one with a visible viewfinder.
|
|
|
| brokenankle's Full Review: Kodak Cameo Motor 110 Camera 35mm Film Camera |
I bought this camera with high expectations. While it was a pretty good camera (a little better than a disposable camera) and offers features such as an auto-timer as well as a fill-in flash option, it does not seem to be very durable. The compact-ed-ness of the camera is a definite plus, leaving little or no reason so carry it in a case, because you can simply throw it in your pocket. After about 1 year, the camera started to take blurry pictures, it may have been the fault of extensive use, and there was pretty much nothing I could do to rescue my pictures. Furthermore the viewfinder is very small, and when other people use your camera, you often get very off-center shots.
Recommended:
No
Amount Paid (US$): 74.99
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID:
brokenankle
|
|
Reviews written: 2
Trusted by: 0 members
|
|
|
- Add to My Yahoo!: 
- Add to Google Homepage: 
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.