|
|
|
Comment |
Sorted by
Date Written |
Re: Little Shop of Gangsters (Reply to this comment)
by George_Chabot,  in Movies
Corman actually did pretty well with a budget. I think I recall seeing a few of his schlock-horror films. Another guy who did well on low bucks was John Carpenter with Assault on Precinct Thirteen. Thanks for leaving a comment, Brian. ;->
|
Feb 15 '04
11:12 am PST
|
|
Re: May have to see this one, George (Reply to this comment)
by George_Chabot, in Movies
This and a lot of the other early gangsters pictures did it with a lot more style than many contemporary films. They showed you enough to get the point but did not make a splatterfest out of it. Thanks for your comment, Matt. You will undoubtedly enjoy this if you see it.
|
Feb 15 '04
11:09 am PST
|
|
Little Shop of Gangsters (Reply to this comment)
by voxpoptart
Roger Corman directed ... a hard-hitting, well orchestrated tale. Period sets, automobiles, clothes, and weapons were impeccable.
Really? Neat! I've seen a few of Corman's low-budget horror-shlock films, and i've thought he showed some sneaky talent in him. But how did he wind up with a budget? I'm happy to hear he spent it well. Excellent review!
cheers,
- Brian
|
Feb 14 '04
12:38 pm PST
|
|
May have to see this one, George (Reply to this comment)
by matthewn
Of course, the movies today show how brutal things like this really were back then. That's one of the reason I like history movies today, but they seem to (today) have a politically correct slant.
Matt
|
Feb 14 '04
9:33 am PST
|
|
|
|
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.