A Volcano in Los Angeles, or Mark Furhman Meets Lava
Written: Jan 24 '04 (Updated Aug 07 '06)
Product Rating:
Pros: lava
Cons: everything else
The Bottom Line: It a message film-no, it's a special effects film-no, it's a relationship film-no, it's about a father and daughter-no, it's about working for EMS....
Plot Details: This opinion reveals major details about the movie''s plot.
As if theres not already enough problems in California with fires, earthquakes, mudslides and typhoons (not to mention recall elections), Los Angeles is about to get its very own volcano.
The first hint that something is amiss is a small earthquake. Meanwhile, in the MacArthur Park area of the city, a public works crew is underground and suddenly severely burned.
In many ways, this movie offers up the same clichés which surfaced in Dantes Peak (which was released the same year as Volcano, 1997), such as the scientist who knows something is wrong and wants to warn everyone, yet no one listens to her. In this case, the character is a seismologist named Amy Barnes (portrayed by Anne Heche).
However, unlike Dantes Peak, Volcano manages to insult the viewers intelligence along the way.
Is it believable that a volcano would erupt under Los Angeles following a moderate earthquake? Not really. Sure, there have been cases of this in real life, such as the Mexican former who one day found a volcano where his fields used to be, but in a city such as this where every seismic shift is monitored with the latest in technology, it would be hard to miss something like this building up.
If I could manage to suspend my disbelief for that part of the story, there are still some huge problems with the movie itself. Tommy Lee Jones portrays the city official recently moved to California from St. Louis. His teenage daughter (portrayed by Gaby Hoffmann) is in town for her annual time with her father when all the events take place. This man presumably then has never faced a big event in the city before. Hes never been in a major earthquake, and hes certainly never faced an erupting volcano under the city. Yes, he has everyone around him listening to all that he has to say.
A big problem comes from the decision to try to enhance Los Angeles national image in the wake of the 1992 L.A. riots. In giving the movie a very overt message about racism, it takes quite a bit from the excitement of the story itself. The racist cop comes up against a man who just wants to see homes - that the viewer is left to assume - that are in a low-income area saved. When the firefighters and officials are resistant to the idea, he immediately begins screaming racism, he is arrested by the cop. There are also scenes where discussion of the subway system - which will be rendered moot by the end of the film - turns into an us vs. them debate as the rich in Beverly Hills are shown protesting a station near them. Meanwhile, lower-income workers are nearby asking them how they expect the people who work for them to get to their places of employment. The ending also tackles the racism issue in a mostly fairy-tale fashion. The whole issue should have been jettisoned from the script, and it would have been much better.
There are other sub-stories going on as well as Roark, the divorced father tries to relate to his visiting daughter in the short time they have together. John Corbett is Stan Olber, a real-estate developer whos about to make a killing with a new building. The building is right next to the hospital where his wife, Dr. Jaye Calder (portrayed by Jacqueline Kim) works. He also exhibits the classism touched on before in that he doesnt want his wife working with these people - meaning anyone who makes less money and doesnt travel in the same social circles as him.
To that end, I guess I was supposed to feel a touch of justice when its his building that needs to be demolished in order to stop the flow of lava through the city. Actually, the whole thing just didnt make sense to me as I felt there was no way a controlled and precise detonation could be pulled off in the short time available to them. It just ended up coming off ridiculous.
As for the special effects, well, with a movie like this youd expect outstanding special effects. For the most part, thats what you get. There are some terrific shots of lava bombs crashing into emergency vehicles and starting fires. For those of us who grew up watching Emergency!, there are some terrific shots among the canyons of Los Angeles of glass buildings on fire and the firefighters trying to battle them.
The real star of the movie - if you want to call it that - is the lava. Herein lies another problem. The lava moves at very different speeds in different areas. At one point when Roark decides to make a stand, the lava moves slow enough that he is able to call for concrete highway dividers to be brought in, have them brought in from wherever they are through all the snarled traffic that must be out of our sight, and stack them up as a barrier before the lava moves two blocks. Shortly thereafter, the lava is shown moving at high speeds through the subway tunnels.
Another problem is that while I understand that the actors shot their scenes and then the lava effect was put in afterward, their reactions to the lava just doesnt seem right. A train has gone off of the tracks down in the subway. As workers make their way toward the train, there is mention of the heat, but because of the confines of the tunnel, it should have been way more intense than the way they react. Here again, the lava is moving slow enough to allow the workers to nearly evacuate the train, although it had been shown moving quite a bit faster.
I cant say that the acting is all that great. Tommy Lee Jones seems to just be Tommy Lee Jones here. Theres no real reach for him at all. There is also no chemistry between him and Anne Heche, so if the writer was trying to create a romantic pairing I think that was ditched during the filming as the script never quite goes there. I dont feel this is a result of Heches on-again, off-again lesbianism, but rather her inability to really act. Ive yet to see her in a role where I really feel shes extending herself.
Don Cheadle is thrown in here for comic relief as hes stuck in the office trying to run interference for Roark with the mayor, a faceless and virtually voiceless entity that comes off like the teacher in the Peanuts specials. He does about whats expected of him. John Corbett is stiff in the role as the real-estate developer, and Jacqueline Kim seems to have no chemistry with him, either, making me wonder what she ever saw in him in the first place.
Of all the problems there are with this film, this is the biggest one. The actors just dont make me care at all about the characters. I dont know if thats Director Mick Jacksons fault for not getting decent performances out of the cast, or just the problem of a rather lame story that hinges on special effects.
Theres no real extras on the DVD, just the theatrical trailer and biographies of the cast and crew. All in all, this is a disaster story that Id skip. If it happens to show up on cable and Im really doing something else, I might leave it on just for the special effects shots. Otherwise, its really lacking, even when just compared to other disaster flicks.
L.A. has seen it all, but it's never been through anything like this. A raging volcano has formed beneath the LaBrea Tar Pits, and the City of Angels ...More at HotMovieSale.com
Something unspeakably chilling is heating up The City of Angels. Beneath the famed La Brea Tar Pits, a raging volcano pushes to the surface, raining a...More at Buy.com Marketplaces
Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources, so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.