Well....It does creep. But the terror? Nope. Great MST3K Fodder!
Written: Mar 06 '06
|
Product Rating:
|
|
|
Pros: Hysterical jokes, and a movie so bad that it's good.
Cons: May cause temporary insanity to know a film this bad exists.
The Bottom Line: Hilarious MST3K episode with featuring the worst movie ever...next to Armageddon.
|
|
|
| forrest_rice's Full Review: Mystery Science Theater 3000 - The Creeping Terror |
|
Plot Details: This opinion reveals major details about the movie's plot.
(Taken from my MST3K Review)
Of course this, as we all know is one of the absolute worst movies ever made. BUT, it isn't the worst movie of all time. If you were to pull out a list of the top five worst films ever made, in fifth place, you might have Eegah!, and then in fourth place, you might have Manos: The Hands of Fate, in third you might have Overdrawn at the Memory Bank and it's sequel Eternal Sunshine on the Spotless Mind. And The Creeping Terror fits firmly in second place. And of course, Michael Bay's Armageddon in first. Now, you might call me an idiot and say, "As bad as Armageddon is, The Creeping Terror is even worse." Well.... I think I have an argument that proves otherwise. Indeed The Creeping Terror is an awful film, but Michael Bay's craptacular movie easily beats it for the title of WORST MOVIE EVER MADE. Let me demonstrate:
1. The Title - Both films have dumb titles, but at least The Creeping Terror has integrity. Although the movie is lacking "terror" the monster does in fact "creep". Therefore, half the title is fully justified. However, in Armageddon at one point in the film, someone says something like: "The Bible predicted this day would come. It is called Armageddon." If the retards that made this film actually read the Revelation prophecy in the Bible, it has nothing to do with a meteorite crashing into earth. It's like making a movie called The Resurrection of Jesus that's about an earthquake in L.A.
2. Acting - The acting in both films is awful, but let's look at two particular girl-and-boy-in-love scenes from each film. In Armageddon we have Animal Cracker Sex. Yes, Animal Cracker Sex. Ben Affleck rubbing Liv Tyler's belly with animal crackers, and sticking them between her breasts. Watching Mitchell lay on a bed with twenty or so empty beer cans on his bed is more appealing. Compare that to The Creeping Terror when Martin plays a practical joke on sneaking up onto his wife, it scares her, she laughs, and they kiss. They're newly married, and their house in small and dreary. They keep a lot of booze on hand. Far closer to the truth.
3. Dialogue - Thankfully, in The Creeping Terror, dialogue is kept to a minimum, and so we only have to deal with a few bad lines here and there. Stuff like "My God what is it!?" or "It sure ain't no airplane." HOWEVER, bad as it is, Armageddon is worse, with lines like:
"FREEDOM! FREEDOM! GOT TO GIVE WHAT IT TAKES....Hello Yankees! I love you
America. (reading from English book) Would you prefer an appetizer or aperitif?"
"HELLO YANKEES! Welcome to the home of me, Cosmonaut Lev Andropov."
"This isn't even like outer space, this is like inner space man."
and exchanges of dialogue, such as:
Max : Oh, man, did I have a dream.
Bear : So did Martin Luther King.
Max : No, this was a bad dream. We were drilling and the ground ate the bit. Then it ate the pipe, then the derrick. Then it ate us.
Bear : That's a dumb dream.
Max : I'm not coming home.
Clearly, The Creeping Terror wins this round as well.
4. Story/Plot - Both movies have really dumb stories - but I think The Creeping Terror is more plausible. Our own galaxy has over a hundred billion stars in it, and just in view of advanced telescopes there are hundreds of billions of galaxies, and beyond that nobody knows. In this huge, infinite, indifferent universe, the chances of a race of aliens that sends carpet monsters to eat humans as a grisly experiment is more likely to happen than NASA sending redneck oil drillers to save the world from total destruction.
5. Editing & Directing - The Creeping Terror has some horrible directing, a completely inept lack of taste, and plenty of bad POV shots. HOWEVER, it doesn't assault you with it's editing. Compare that with Michael Bay's camera that apparently has ADD, his edits that make MTV look subtle and nuanced, and his complete inability to make the audience believe anything that's going on. I did believe that Martin and Barney in The Creeping Terror were cops in a dingy little town, but I can't believe that Ben Affleck and Bruce Willis were oil drillers sent to save the world.
6. Special Effects - I think that the carpet monster, however bad as it looks, is still more real than Ben Affleck as a tough guy.
I think my point is clear. As bad as The Creeping Terror is, indeed, it is not the WORST movie ever made. Plus, The Creeping Terror, by the looks of it couldn't have cost more than a couple bucks. Armageddon costs a bazillion gazillion trillion dollars, which could have been spend on, like, finding the cure for cancer, or feeding Africa.
As for the MST3K episode itself....The riffing in this episode was hilarious. I'd laugh out loud every couple of seconds, sometimes at the totally absurd ineptitude of the film, often because of Mike and the 'Bots' hilarious riffs:
Narrator: He asked Martin what he though of it.
Martin: It sure ain't no airplane.
Crow: They never asked Martin another question.
Great episode, and the host segments are mildly funny, and capture an almost midnight up-late feel to them. A classic episode that I watch a lot, and it gets funnier and funnier. This is a truly hilarious episode of MST3K! Get it! NOW!
Recommended:
Yes
|
|
|
|
Epinions.com ID: forrest_rice
|
|
Location: Sin City
Reviews written: 47
Trusted by: 10 members
About Me: Like an unmuddied lake, sir. Clear as an azure sky of deepest summer.
|
|
|