Knight's Tale Reviews

Knight's Tale

162 consumer reviews |Write a Review
Average Rating: Very Good
5 stars
36
4 stars
56
3 stars
38
2 stars
19
1 star
13
Share This!
  Ask friends for feedback

Where Can I Buy It?Compare all Prices

$3.99 Amazon Marketplace Lowest Price
Read all 162 Reviews | Write a Review

About the Author

Darkmistress
Epinions.com ID: Darkmistress
Location: Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Reviews written: 480
Trusted by: 137 members
About Me: I'm legit! Isn't my cover beee-you-tea-full!

Wear Earplugs

Written: May 12 '01
Pros:Most of the costumes and scenery
Cons:too much to list here
The Bottom Line: Don't do it! Save 2 and 1/2 hours of your life to do something worthwhile.

Plot Details: This opinion reveals major details about the movie's plot.

I have been dying to see this movie since the first promotional pictures started appearing in magazines. A medieval movie with accurate costumes and dirt? I’m there. And there I was on the first day it showed holding my breathing and hoping that the preview I had watched and the commercials I had seen had misrepresented the movie.

And they hadn’t.

Maybe you haven’t noticed, but I’m a bit of a history buff. Medieval history. Particularly the Plantagenets, but beggers can’t be choosers. Unfortunately, it means that when I watch one of these movies I am acutely aware of anachronisms and can be counted on to look up more later. I didn’t have to look hard.

But let me start with the things that are right.
The sets are beautiful, possibly a bit cleaner than realistic (the sets in Stealing Heaven were as close to perfect as I have ever seen.) The aerial shot of London was very nice. Cheapside in the rain with it’s houses lurching against one another. Ahh.

The costumes (mostly) are accurate. The squires are wearing loose pants and a loose shirt. The same set. Every day (until their fortunes improve.) This is something that Hollywood consistently screws up and I was pleased to see it done right here.

That was a short list wasn’t it?

What’s wrong (anachronistically)
Chaucer was in royal service from the time he was 20 until his death. He was never walking down a road naked because of gambling debts. He also sits in the presence of Prince Edward. He could have been beheaded for that. In the movie, Edward had a sword in his hands when Chaucer was sitting down and due to his being known as a kind of crabby guy probably would have cut Chaucer off in the spring of his career.

Joycelyn wears a dress at one point through which you can clearly see her breasts. No nipples, but breasts.

Joycelyn is a post 60’s feminist. Interesting trick, wouldn’t you say? Now not all women were cowed and silent creatures in the Middle Ages. Joan of Arc wasn’t the only woman to take the sword, but it would never occur to a woman (or a man of less than royal birth) to YELL AT A PRIEST. Joycelyn also wanders around without an escort and that’s just a good way to get kidnapped and raped in the Middle Ages.

Joycelyn has black hair, swarthy skin, and a big mole on her face. The Medieval ideal woman was as blond as possible, pale and free of imperfections. This actress would make a wonderful Joanna should anyone ever decide to film Here Be Dragons. But Joanna was beautiful to the Welsh, not the Normans. She would not have been competed for unless she was worth a lot of money. (And while I’m on the subject of appearances, what was going on with the topiary hairdos? Middle Ages, time of braids and twists and circlets and they did that to her hair. Now she really looks like a freak.)

There was no disco dancing in the Middle Ages.

William should have been beheaded for impersonating nobility.

What’s wrong (as a movie)
There’s no plot. There are 2 clichéd story lines (boy meets girl and poor boy does well,) but no real plot.

The soundtrack is the most mismatched thing I can imagine. "The Boys Are Back In Town," AC/DC, "We Will Rock You." When, in the opening scene, the audience started singing along and pounding out the rhythm to "We Will Rock You" we almost walked out.

The dialogue doesn’t sit still. Characters swing from stiff and awful Middle English to stiff and awful American slang. Hello?

There is no chemistry between the main characters. The only relationship I could identify was between Chaucer and Wat and they hated each other. The villain, Count Adhemar, was worthless. His greatest contribution to this was explaining how jousts are scored.

As we were leaving the theatre my husband said "You know, that movie would have been a lot better if I’d been wearing earplugs."


Recommended: No


Suitability For Children: Not suitable for Children of any age

Read all comments (6)|Write your own comment
Read all 162 Reviews | Write a Review

Share with your friends   
Share This!


Where can I buy it?
Showing 1-4 of 6 deals
Fantastic prices with ease & c...
There's no rule against rock anthems from the 1970s in the soundtrack for a movie about a medieval jousting champion, but if you're going to attempt s...
Amazon Marketplace
Store Rating: 3.0
After serving a number of years as a squire, an earnest young commoner poses as a knight and establishes himself in the jousting tournaments of Europe...
Walmart
Store Rating: 3.0
Earn 2% eBay Bucks on qualifyi...
In the Middle Ages, before television or professional sports, there is only one form of competition to separate the men from the boys: jousting tourna...
eBay
Store Rating: 4.0

This crowd-pleasing medieval adventure tale is very loosely inspired by Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales and mixes the anachronistic elements o...
Walmart
Store Rating: 3.0
View More Deals       Why are these stores listed?