theuerkorn's Full Review: Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Lens
So you just got that amazing entry level professional dSLR (EOS 20D) and finally grew out of the kit lens. You even upgraded to a more versatile universal zoom lens and a dedicated portrait / macro lens. Now may be the time to discover that you need more to go 'farther' -- literally. Or to be more exact, to bring far objects closer. A 70-300mm telephoto lens is the perfect companion for the Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM f4/5.6 regarding covered field of view, and applying the 1.6x lens factor of the EOS 20D or Digital Rebel alike, the 300mm actually are more like 480mm in 35mm terms. Now that's already a serious telephoto lens!
I just upgraded from a (optically not bad) "Sigma 70-300mm Super II Macro APO", and the reasons for spending the extra $$$ read basically like the main features of the Canon lens:
- Diffractive Optics = more compact
- Image Stabilization = extended usability
- Ultrasonic Drive = quiet & fast
- Internal Focus = better handling
So let's see if these were all the right reasons to spend the money ...
Based on those dimensions, size may appear to some like a phishy argument for Diffractive Optics, but Canon claims to also achieve picture quality comparable to a 'L' grade lens (low distortion). Reviewing the MFT chart and comparing it to the Sigma doesn't support such claim and taking a few pictures on a tripod (disabled IS) revealed that the APO is slightly superior in contrast (resolution) but slightly inferior regarding chromatic aberration (color fringing) in the near-field. Taking the same experiment to the far-field clearly brought the Canon lens out on top. The following list and ranking is subjective and the rating comparitive ...
Sharpness ranking (tripod): f~70mm / d=1.5m / a=f8
1. Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM (*****)
2. Sigma 70-300mm f4/5.6 APO Macro Super II (****-)
3. Canon EF 70-300mm f4.5/f5.6 IS DO USM (***--)
4. Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4/5.6 IS USM (***--)
5. [Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-f5.6 (**---)]
Sharpness ranking (handheld): f=300mm / d=200m / a=f8
1. Canon EF 70-300mm f4.5/f5.6 IS DO USM (****-)
2. Sigma 70-300mm f4/5.6 APO Macro Super II (**---)
Chromatic Aberration ranking: f~70mm / d=1.5m / a=f8
1. Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM (*****)
2. Canon EF 70-300mm f4.5/f5.6 IS DO USM (****-)
3. Sigma 70-300mm f4/5.6 APO Macro Super II (***--)
4. Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4/5.6 IS USM (**---)
5. [Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-f5.6 (*----)]
Chromatic Aberration ranking: f=300mm / d=200m / a=f8
1. Canon EF 70-300mm f4.5/f5.6 IS DO USM (*****)
2. Sigma 70-300mm f4/5.6 APO Macro Super II (***--)
f ... focal length
d ... distance
a ... aperture
Apparently size isn't such a good argument for this lens and sharpness (near-field) isn't either even on a tripod with disabled IS. The advantage of the only fixed lens in this test isn't all that surprising, but the better up-close performance of the Sigma over the much more expensive Canon EF 70-300mm f4.5/f5.6 IS DO USM sure is. This is most likely attributable to the macro function (below 2 meters) of the Canon telephoto lens. In the end the most expensive lens (DO) justifies its existence with significantly better far-field results (focal length = 300mm, distance > 2 meters) due to better chromatic aberration and mostly the Image Stabilization. So let's take a closer look at that (IS) ...
Applying the lens factor to dSLRs like the Canon EOS 20D (1.6x), it becomes very hard to hold the camera steady enough for a sharp picture. (Now you need at least 1/480 sec shutter speed, since the smaller 'negative' also uses smaller photo receptors for the same output resolution. (Photo cells are 6.4 micron in the case of the 20D, or 1/20 of a human hair.)
Be advised that IS is an active system and typically only "works" with the trigger pushed half down and during the actual shutter action. It's designed to take the 'jitter' out of hand-held shots at slow shutter speeds, but works slightly against you on tripods. In those cases it's better to turn IS off to prevent the mechanism from slightly moving in it's resonance frequency and ultimately causing a slight blur. Further, the power consumption of the IS reduces battery life in a EOS 20D to 80% under normal use (up to 10 sec focus time per shot). However, frequent focussing without actually taking a shot will reduce battery life to less than 80%. (I found that during the intitial play time, battery time was reduced to as little as 30%.)
Anyway, Image Stabilization works well within the scope, and is especially useful for the far end of the zoom range where a big aperture (i.e. f2) would give extremely shallow DOF. (The focal length of 300mm translates into 8 degree of horizontal viewing angle. For the EOS 20D that's divided into 3500 pixels, and even minute motion (less than 0.0025 degree) causes approximation over 2 pixels ... a.k.a. blur.) Of course all this holds only true for static subjects relative to the shutter speed.
As other professional lenses with IS, the EF 70-300mm IS DO USM allows basically two IS modes with one active in both axis' and the other one to allow panning while stabilizing only the vertical axis. This is especially interesting as it works both in portrait and landscape. The camera body determines the orientation and tells the lens which is the vertical axis to be compensated and only leave the horizontal untouched for panning. (Note: The Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM f4/5.6 doesn't provide the panning mode.)
Overall, Image Stabilization performs well and certainly scores points for this lens. Let's see if the final major argument (USM drive) can do the same ...
The extremely fine near-field focus range of the Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM may not be a good example for a speedy AF of a USM drive, but putting the EF 70-300mm IS DO USM into comparison to the traditional "Sigma 70-300mm" drive, makes clear that USM has an edge and is much (!) quieter while performing significantly faster. Overall speed feels very similar to the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4/5.6 IS USM lens. A nice side effect of Canon's USM drive is that using the manual focus ring during autofocus does not harm the drive. Your investment in this lens is safe in the long-run, good to know at a similar price as the EOS 20D body itself.
Cameras supporting E-TTL II (like the EOS 20D) require an USM drive for distance feedback. Hence by using the enhanced flash in the Rebel XT or EOS 20D, this lens might even help your flash pictures -- provided you're close enough. However, given the scope of a telephoto lens, this may not be significant since your subject may be well out of reach for even the most powerful external flash.
The included lens pouch (LP1116, $30 value) is a nice touch, though it really should be a standard. Both the Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM and the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4/5.6 IS USM didn't have a pouch included despite the relatively high price. The same is true for the included hood ($25 value), which neither of the other two lenses had either.
The EF 70-300mm IS DO USM sports a lock switch which keeps the lens in the 70mm position (only) to prevent damage due to accidentally extending the front barrel and hitting an obstruction while hanging off the neck strap. This is also important for storing since the weight of the lens body (700g) pulls the telescope out easily when grabbing the lens by the hood (which fits on reversed for storage). The internal focus is independent from that lock and should you 'forget' to release it, all that happened is that your lens just got turned into a quasi-fixed 70mm lens. Under normal use, however, the lens doesn't creep out of zoom, but pointing vertically up or down will move the lens with very little shock impact and sometimes even without. This is especially cumbersome since the zoom adjustment ring sits very close to the camera body and not necessarily in a natural position when taking pictures.
The macro mode is seamless and works across the whole zoom range (unlike the Sigma lens). It does't require a mechanical switch as seen in the Sigma 70-300mm Super II APO. However, it's no replacement for a dedicated macro lens either and this may be rather insignificant.
The EF mount makes this investment future-proof as it fits both Canon's smaller dSLRs and traditional film cameras as well as professional full-frame dSLRs. So even if you upgrade from the entry level professional dSLR (EOS 20D) to a full frame or 35mm camera, this lens is designed to stay with you. The same may not be true for the more specialized EF-S mount as found in the Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS f4/5.6 USM and
Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM.
Somewhat odd is the Field of View (FOV) in direct comparison to the similar Sigma lens. While virtually identical in the far-field (focus near infinity), at below 2 meter distance (macro) the Canon lens' 300 mm focal length feels more like the 200 mm of the Sigma lens.
The EF 70-300mm IS DO USM is a tempting mix of modern technology and overall useful features: Three diffractive optics keep size relatively small. Image stabilization turns the relatively slow lens into a near f2.8 lens. Chromatic aberration is low (long distance) and similar to more expensive 'L' lenses (low dispersion) from Canon. The ultrasonic drive moves the internal focus rather quickly and without much noise. The distance readout for E-TTL II may be less of importance since your target may be well outside the reach of any flash anyway.
If it was just for picture sharpness (contrast) while using a tripod, the EF 70-300mm IS DO USM appears too expensive compared to the "Sigma APO" while gaining almost similar picture quality -- on average. The scale tilts in favor of the Canon lens when attempting handheld shots and quick focus is essential. For moving objects, (i.e. sports photography) both lenses are at a disadvantage to a speedier lens (f2.8 or better) -- especially in low light conditions. However, looking at a "f2.8 L" zoom lens brings cost and size up significantly. The next best thing might as well be the EF 70-300mm IS DO USM.
In applications where more depth of field is needed, a faster lens typically is stopped down to a slow aperture (i.e. f8) anyway and looses all of it's advantage. (A big aperture rating like f1.4 or f2 produces very shallow depth of field in telephoto lenses.) This is exactly the point where Image Stabilization has no match since it still allows to shoot at f8 while following the shutter speed rules of roughly f4.
The EF 70-300mm IS DO USM has a purpose and if you remember my intentions for this lens, this is exactly what I got out of it. A great telephoto lens with excellent far-field performance! For everything else, well I still have the other lenses which may be better fits in certain applications. (i.e. macro and portrait are better left to the Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM lens.
Overall, I can absolutely recommend the EF 70-300mm IS DO USM but before you spend the money, it may be worth to look at the Sigma 70-300mm APO Super II. It saves you almost $1000.- and produces similar results regarding sharpness (contrast) with sufficient light available or a tripod. However, if you need IS and excellent (minimal) chromatic aberration, the EF 70-300mm IS DO USM is a prime candidate near the $1000.
* ... Chromatic Aberration: White light is "formed" by a wide range of different light wavelengths. Each wavelength has a slightly different focal point in the same lens. Advanced designs try to compensate for this effect with optics that negate physics (aspherical lens). In less sophisticated designs, this is very obvious near the picture border when photographing an intense white object (i.e. picket fence in bright daylight) in front of a high contrast background. Often you find a blue "halo" on one side and a red one on the other of the white object. This is mostly due to a standard lens design that doesn't compensate for the physical effect called "Chomatic Aberration". However, even the most advanced designs are not completely free of this effect, especially in the very corners.
More detail on chromatic aberration ...
http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glossary/Optical/Chromatic_Aberrations_01.htm
Another online review (w/ pictures) ...
http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/70_300/
A superior performance ultra-compact telephoto zoom lens with Canon's Image Stabilization. These Diffractive Optics elements are combined to reduce s...More at Newegg.com
A superior performance, ultra-compact telephoto zoom lens with Canon's Image Stabilization. These Diffractive Optics elements are combined to reduce s...More at Adorama
Shipping from $11.85. Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Lens, Professional Quality Zoom Telephoto, Built-In Image Stabilizer, For Digital or Film ...More at B&H Photo-Video-Pro Audio
pmidigital Store PMI Digital 888-212-6686 845-371-9221 Item Includes Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Zoom Lens Front Lens Cap Rear Lens Cap Canon 1-Y...More at eBay
Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources, so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.
- Add to My Yahoo!: 
- Add to Google Homepage: 
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.