Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Learn More! | Sign In   
           
Home > Electronics > Standard Televisions > Philips 34PW850H 34 inch TV
Philips 34PW850H 34 inch TV

Philips 34PW850H 34 inch TV
Overall Rating: Product Rating: 3.5
Sound:
Ease of Use:
Picture Quality:
Durability:

Compare Prices Read Reviews (8) View Details Write a Review
<< Back to All Reviews About the Author

Owned it for 3 days and back to the store it went...

Written: Jan 24 '05

Product Rating: Product Rating: 1.0
Sound:  
Ease of Use:  
Picture Quality:  
Durability:  
Pros: 16:9 display

Cons: Picture quality, remote, menu system, silver bezel
almonds's Full Review: Philips 34PW850H 34 inch TV
Here's an oxymoron - HDTV with an awful picture. This is one to avoid. If you are thinking of getting an HD set, don't get this one.

Picture is terrible, glare on the screen is unmanageable, and the menu system is too elementary. There are almost no adjustments and this set could really use them.

Would not recommend.


Recommended:
No

Amount Paid (US$): 1199.00
Comments on this Review
 Read all comments (1)
 Write your own comment
Epinions.com ID:
almonds
Reviews written: 4
Trusted by: 0 members

<< Return to top
<< Back to All Reviews




Related Search Terms   
philips tv

Subscribe to More Reviews on Standard Televisions
Get the RSS Feed: - Add to My Yahoo!: Add to My Yahoo! - Add to Google Homepage: Add to Google

Subscribe to almonds's Reviews:
Get the RSS Feed: - Add to My Yahoo!: Add to My Yahoo! - Add to Google Homepage: Add to Google

Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds | Price Comparison UK

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.