Pros: Not quite as bad as everyone says. Cons: Still pretty bad.
Oh boy - I knew this was coming. Some day, sooner or later, I would have to review what is considered by many fans to be one of the worst episodes of the entire run. But is it as bad as all that? Lets find out. . . . First, for those of you just ...
Pros: It probably was a good script at one point. Cons: cheap, scornful, nasty, pointless defeatist trash, thoroughly mean spirited.
The John Nathan Turner producership of Doctor Who (1980-1989) started well with a rich rennaisance of ideas and concepts and an up to date visual flair, but by 1984 this had given way to fan-pleasing nostalgia and depressing derivativeness, as old ...
These human beings will die as they have lived-in a sea of their own blood! The year is 2084, and two power-blocs are poised on the brink of war. Usin...More at Buy.com
Continuation of the "Silurian" stories see also "The Silurians" and "Sea Devils". The intrepid doctor negotiates with the Silurians to keep them from ...More at Family Video
Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources, so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.