Highest Rated Review by the Community
-
May 06 '04
Pros: Great responsive cushioning.
Cons: none noted
Summary: If you’re working out in a pair of no name cheapies that read, "ike" and the swoosh insignia looks like it has been tacked on with crazy glue, you could be making a huge mistake. Wearing the wrong athletic shoe can make for a quick retreat ... read more
-
-
Jul 04 '06
Pros: Light,Soft,Pillowlike,Comfortable
Cons: Dont make you jump 15 feet high
Summary: I always wanted to try shox for hockey training but i was into a few pairs of acis when i decided to give them a try.If you know me i have 20+ pairs of shoes all rather expensive and im somewhat of a collecter,i dont belive i wore the same pair ... read more
-
-
Jan 23 '06
Pros: They look great at barbeques
Cons: Less bounce for the ounce than conventional Shox
Summary: I have been wearing Shox technology based running shoes since Nike first brought it out some years ago. I have seen some of the early problems with sole breakage come and go, but I stuck with the concept because it provided me with the one thing my ... read more
-
-
Oct 19 '04
Pros: Cool as F***
Ultra-comfy
Amazing cushioning (good for Osgood-Schlatter's sufferers)
Cons: So many fakes on eBay
Can be expensive
Eventually they will wear out! :-(
Summary: I'm just gonna get straight to the point, no polymer classification to be found here. Please bear in mind this is a review for the NIKE SHOX TL2, the SECOND TOTAL SHOX RUNNING SHOE FROM NIKE. - Look - Anyone with half a brain can tell these shoes ... read more
-
-
Apr 26 '04
Pros: Incredible, responsive cushioning, great traction, durability of Shox columns
Cons: Not for every runner, radical look (which I love)
Summary: Now, you probably are looking at this shoe and saying, "This is seriously bugged out!" by the way it looks. This is the first Nike running shoe to put full-length Shox in the midsole and boy, does it perform. Let's wander to the upper, which is ... read more
-
-
Apr 22 '04
Pros: Comfortable, great looks.
Cons: Expensive. Some really bad colors.
Summary: This is one of the most interesting shoes I have ever seen. Let me first start by saying that I am not an avid runner. I run my 5 k every other day and I finish within 20-25 minutes, so I am no where near a great runner. I have worn Nike running shoes ... read more
-
- Express Reviews
-
Jul 26 '10
Pros: Light, comfortable to wear.
They were on sale so at least I didn't pay full price.
Cons: Sole detached after 6 months of light wear.
Nike doesn't stand behind their products.
Summary: I bought Nike Shox for my 15 year old son for $80 at Sports Authority. Within 6 months, the shock part detached from the sole, making them unwearable. He did not use them for running, only walking around so did not put undue stress on
-
Jun 02 '09
Pros: Comfortable; Running in them feels like the stress on knees and ankles is lessened
Cons: Bottoms fell apart. Poor or cheap construction.
Summary: I don't want to say that I hate the shoe, but i've only had them for a little over a year, and the bottoms are just peeling right off...I don't even run on them that often, as I had intended. I would expect them to stay together a little longer if
-
Apr 24 '08
Pros: The shoe was very comfortable.It gave my son a lot of spring to his step.
Cons: The shoe is poorly constructed and falls apart after one month of wear.
Summary: For the first month this shoe was awesome. My 7 year old son enjoyed wearing the shoe .It had great cushion impact.But about a month into wear,the heel on one side came slightly unglued.After stepping into a mud puddle we washed the shoes.The shoe became
-
Jul 24 '06
Pros: Huge shock absorption
Totally comfortable
Cons: Do tend to wear quickly
Summary: I've been wearing Shox now (different models, but now running with the TL) for 2 years. I had really bad plantars from a heavy marathon schedule. The Shox design has totally helped me heal..lots of absorption in the right spots and enough arch support
-
Oct 03 '05
Pros: expensive shoes with wow factor
Cons: shox don't last and are not worth it
Summary: We bought these >$100 shoes since the guarantee was "lifetime". The shocks wore out within 6 months, a much shorter lifespan then other kid's shoes that we have had. When we went them in to be fixed, we got a letter back stating that since the
-
Jul 18 '05
Pros: Great cushioning, excellent arch support
Cons: Poor Durability. Pricey.
Summary: These shoes offer a very smooth ride. Although not considered a stability shoe, the internal construction of the TL2 offers excellent arch support - although I have chronic knee problems and flat feet, I did not experience any knee/ankle pain while
-
Jun 24 '05
Pros: Very comfortable and great for people with bad knees.
Cons: Worn out after eight months of running four to five times a week.
Summary: I've had this shoe for a little over a year. I've been fairly consistent with running four to five times a week. It was great the first eight months, but it wore out after eight months.
-
Oct 15 '04
Pros: Extremely soft, very light
Cons: Wore out in three months, wreaked havoc on my gait.
Summary: for the money, I think next time I'll buy a hooker and a baseball bat. At least I'll enjoy watching her beat me in the knees and hips, which is where the pain arose from running in these shoes for just three months. Due to pronation, the rear outer
|
|
