Star Trek

Pros: Great casting, good story line, nice humor.
Cons: Dragged a bit in one part but other than that, it was great!

I don't know what I expected but this exceeded everything I could imagine.  This movie was funny, thrilling, and full of adventure.  The casting was awesome, too!  The actors did a fabulous job of portraying those much-beloved characters ...

Pros: Good effects, some performances excellent.
Cons: @#$%#$@% up enterprise, contuity, charactrs messed up, did they need to destroy another classic car?

First of all I will describe all people in here as the characters, and not the actors real names.  So when I describe Uhura's performance, I will be speaking about the actress.George Kirk: Since we don't have much of a reference point, other ...

Pros: Star Trek is back and better than ever!
Cons: The Planet Vulcan was destroyed in this alternate reality.

What a comeback! Star Trek has returned to its full glory and this movie proved that something that was thought dead can be resurrected. This movie deals with a Romulan seeking revenge on Ambassador Spock for what he perceived as a betrayal when he did ...

Pros: Pine, Quinto, Nimoy, supporting performances, script, direction
Cons: Supporting players should have received more characterization

The journey ended for the crew of the starship Enterprise in "Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country" in 1992. Director J. J. Abrams now goes back to the beginnings of the crew whose exploits have remained popular for generations of Trekkers and others. ...

Pros: pays respectful homage to the original without trying to duplicate everything.
Cons: too much whiz-bang, not enough depth. Kirk hanging by fingertips from ledges.

I was a Trekkie. I was not the freakish sort who spent time memorizing stardates and other minutia of particular episodes. I did, however, attend a few conventions wearing costumes. I usually went as an alien. The aliens weren't always authentic to the ...

Pros: Pine's fun imitation of Shatner's quirky portrayal of Capt. Kirk; look and pacing, some humor
Cons: clumsy time travel plot, Spock is too emotional, boring villian

The Star Trek franchise has been on life support for the last decade or so, and was just waiting for someone to come along and revive it. Star Trek: The Next Generation gave the franchise a major boost in the late 80s and 90s, and the mid-to-late 90s saw ...

Pros: Excellent Story, Excellent Direction, Excellent Cast, Excellent SFX...Just plain Excellent!
Cons: I'm at a loss on this one.

Wow! Where do I begin? I've been a Trekkie since I was very young, watching reruns of the original series religiously. When The Next Generation came out, I was skeptical, after all, Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock weren't in it so how could it possibly be ...

Pros: The character portrayals by Chris Pine and Simon Pegg.
Cons: The love relationship between Spock and Uhura. 

Ahoy there be SPOILERS ahead!! I saw this movie 1 ½ times when I went to see it the first weekend it opened. The newspaper had the time wrong for "Star Trek" so I saw the last 30 minutes of it -hence the 1/2,- but went back to see it in ...

Pros: Brand new storyline, but tributes to the original Trek too
Cons: Not enough Nero!

Being married to a Star Trek fan isn't easy. In fact it's blooming hard!! I could swear sometimes I know more about it than he does and it's scary! So to find out there was a new Star Trek movie coming out brought a sigh of "not another one" from me and ...

Pros: Terrifically fun, very good performances, solid second half
Cons: Lousy action cinematography, hacky plot, feels nothing like Star Trek (Con?)

My current kick of reviewing science fiction films had to eventually lead me to this summer's breakout hit, and thus far only decent film by any popular or critical standard, Star Trek.  I was never a huge fan of any of the television shows ...

Pros: Stellar casting, solid effects, good script and story, nice reboot of a classic franchise. 
Cons: Eric Bana's villain isn't quite big enough for the big time. 

My wife is a wonderfully patient woman.  I've got a little bit of a media obsession...okay, a lot of one.  Sometimes that means action figures, sometimes DVDs, sometimes horrible cartoons or shows from the 1970's that should have been left in ...

Pros: great action, good acting, believable plot, Nimoy, humor, some emotional parts
Cons: a little contrived but JJ Abrams makes it work

I'm such a geek. My husband volunteered to watch the kiddies while I went to the movies tonight and I chose to watch Star Trek. I'd heard good things about it and it looked great in the previews. I have to say, it was worth my $10. ...

Pros: Strong cast and excellent effects.
Cons: Not enough McCoy.

Star Trek starts off with a bang: A Federation starship is being brutally attacked by a vengeful, time-traveling Romulan warlord called Nero (Eric Bana). Among the survivors are the infant James T. Kirk and his mother. The film then jumps about a ...

Pros: Likable cast, nice action, accessible
Cons: Turns Star Trek into Star Wars, very formulaic

In Hollywood, there haven't been many better cash-grab ideas than prequels. They are especially great because they don't require much from the creativity department, since the characters everybody knows and loves all return, only now we see them before ...

Pros: generally well-casted, intriguing story, leaves room for further movies
Cons: Casting wasn't perfect; plays a little fast and loose with the Trek timeline

Like many other fans of the original Star Trek series, I was eagerly anticipating this movie, wondering how it would be. For me, the various TV sequels ran hot and cold. I liked "The Next Generation" and LOVED DS9, but Kate Mulgrew (Voyager) and Scott ...