Pros: Some imaginative cinematography and effects Cons: Utterly ridiculous, baffling and atrociously scripted.
Your mother sucks cocks in hell. So I've heard anyway, but I don't believe everything I hear on the big screen. It's all made up, scurrilous nonsense, scripted by men in smoky rooms with overactive imaginations, who try to make us believe that dinosaurs ...
Pros: Extremely ambitious, new perspective on series, startling images Cons: very confused, weak direction, difficult to follow plot
John Boorman's Exorcist sequel is generally only mentioned when discussing the worst sequels/biggest disappointments in cinema history. On its 1977 release critics and fans of the original alike lambasted both cast and director in a pretty nasty way. ...
Pros: Good example of what NOT to do when making a movie. Cons: Stupid is the only word that comes to mind.
How else can I describe the "Exorcist 2: The Heretic" except to say it was ridiculous? After the spectacular first movie, "The Exorcist", there were hopes that this sequel would be just as good. Unfortunately, this movie was quite disappointing, at ...
Pros: They spent money on the photography Cons: They didn't spend money on anything else
After I saw the original EXORCIST (1973) I was ashamed to admit to people that I slept with the lights on for nearly a week. After I saw EXORCIST2: THE HERETIC (1977) I was ashamed to admit to people that I paid good money for a ticket. This is one ...
Pros: Richard Burton, Linda Blair, Visual Effects, Cons: Zero Psychological Chills and no horror whatsoever
William Friedkin's classic 1973 movie The Exorcist is a masterpiece of Psychological Horror that shocked and terrified movie-goers worldwide. I was one of those audience members shivering in the audience at this new wave of Psychological Horror ...
Pros: Linda Blair, fantastic cinematography,
special effects Cons: weak finale, slow pacing, sometimes does
not make much sense
Exorcist II: The Heretic was released four years after the
smash award winning hit The Exorcist. I don't really have to say that it was a big failure. It made no money, critics
and audiences alike laughed it off the screen and director
...
Pros: a couple of interesting scenes involving James Earl Jones Cons: most of the movie is a con
Usually I'm happy to share a horror film with you. The first Exorcist is a treat to watch. The true heracy was following it up with this sequel. When the original viewing was laughed at, the director pulled the print and added new footage....
Pros: none Cons: bad actors, bad makeup, bad set and it didn't make any sense!
The subject of my opinion pretty much sums this movie up! I just have one question: Could someone PLEASE explain this movie to me? I'm just wondering why did they even bother?! The first movie told the ENTIRE story! Sometimes i just dont understand why...
Pros: See LINDA BLAIR tapdance. Cons: sEE linda fall.
Apparently some viewers laughed and walked out when this little junket was first released {isn't 'REPOSSESED' suppoused to be the send-up.]This unintentionally hysterically lame and tame piece of hoop-la goes nowhere fast,(BUT EXCEEDING SLOWLY) ...
I love the exorcist and the exorcisyt two and the exorcist three but thsi one is my favorite because the acting is really really reallly reallly good and the devil is really well made. you should see this one evwen befor e seeing any of the others...
Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources, so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.