Final Destination 3

Pros: gory,well written and acted out.
Cons: None

My dad borrowed the movie final destination 3 from one of my cousins I figured why not watch this one since I have seen the other two that had came out already. A few of the scenes really scared me and usually nothing really bothers me because I love ...

Pros: One of the most enjoyable movies I've seen in theatres for a long time.
Cons: Corny and same premise as the first two.

Recently, Final Destination has become one of my favourite series of movies. I bought the first not long ago and have already watched it a couple of times. I also saw the second, and loved it. The first two Final Destination movies had managed to be some ...

Pros: Great acting, suspenseful, creepy, scary, chilling and best movie out of the three.
Cons: None

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. I think it was the best out of the three and I would love to see a fourth. I love a movie where I can connect with a character and I found this happened with Wendy, she is a very real person who happens to be gifted ...

Pros: Really cool death scenes, decent cast, smart thriller, special effects.
Cons: It aims toward the high school audience.

So here we are. At number 3 in this franchise about cheating death. Who knew the series would go this far? It all started in 2000 with a film called Final Destination. A movie about a group of young adults cheating death with Alex Browning's help. A ...

Pros: Very imaginative special effects.
Cons: That's all that carries this movie.

FINAL DESTINATION 3 (which I will now abbreviate as FD3) is a continuation of what may be a hardy franchise in teen screamers. Within that genre (and I emphasize that qualifier) it a good flick. In case you dodged the two previous FD movies, I ...

Pros: Creative, fun, decent acting and creates a sense of suspense
Cons: Believability is at times sacrificed for flare. A bit gory.

Final Destination 3, released in 2006, is one of those movies you just might not expect to be good. After all, it has a cast of people you've probably never heard of and its a sequel once removed from the original. Yet, I started watching the movie on ...

Pros: New characters, constant links to prequels, tension throughout
Cons: bare storyline, predictable at times, unnecessary gore

The first Final Destination movie(2000) brought something quite unique to the horror scene. The belief that you cannot cheat death. When your time is up you have to go. The basic story was of a teenager Alex Chance Browning(Devon Sawa) has a ...

Pros: it`s suspenseful, I couldn`t of picked better actors myself
Cons: the ending could of been better

The Final Destination movies are always different, first one - car crash up, number two - airplane, and that's leaves 3 - roller coaster! But wait... Final Destination 3, is not the Final Destination what about Final Destination 4: The Final Destination! ...

Pros: Death scenes, fast pace, nicely cast, conclusion
Cons: Unoriginality, highly stereotyped characters

First.. let's ask ourself a philosophical question: How many final destinations can one life have? My wife is a huge fan of these films, but I had only watched the first in the series, and that was when it first came out. I skipped the second one ...

Pros: Some original moments
Cons: Too mechanical

Final Destination 3 proves that a decent horror movie idea can’t be stretched into a trilogy without sucky consequences. I thought the original movie offered a cool premise and the sequel had some of the most creative death scenes ever, but this ...

Pros: Shocking deaths, hilarious moments
Cons: Same old storyline, certain scenes are predictable

In the original Final Destinations, Alex Chance Browning (Devon Sawa) saved his mates from plane crash, only to have them killed one by one in freakish accidents. Then in Final Destination 2,Kimberly Corman (lovely A.J. Cook) saved strangers from their ...

Pros: New plot, good scenes.
Cons: You know how it is going to play out, the escapees from death will die.

Like its predecessors, FINAL DESTINATION 3 delivers plenty of icky death scenes and sometimes startling violence. Still relying on the same 'death is going to get one no matter what you do to avoid it' formula used in the first 2 Final Destination ...

Pros: Director Wong's fast-paced editing. Gore factor achieves epic levels. Instantly forgettable camp.
Cons: With my expectation bar laying on the ground "FD-3" could not fail to achieve.

My local six-plex movie theater (Glen Cove Cinema, L.I., NY) runs $4.00 movie night on Tuesdays. That’s $4.00 for any movie at any time. Relative to the fact that on regular nights two tickets, a bucket of popcorn, or two, and a pair of Snapple’s runs in ...

Pros: really great effects, some great moments
Cons: very lame dialog, very trite, flat, love story was never explored.

You might think that a film called "Final Destination" would have no sequels. Going on that theory, you'd think it was a bit odd that the video game "Final Fantasy" has so many sequels. Why not just call the game "Fantasy" and this film, ...

Pros: interesting premise, new characters, never boring, intense
Cons: very violent, extreme gore, thin in story

When it comes to movies that should have sequels, this series of films is a set that really didn't need them. Final Destination 3 is of course the third one in a series of films about kids trying to escape death. The premise of all three of them ...