Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens Reviews

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens

22 consumer reviews |Write a Review
Average Rating: Very Good
5 stars
7
4 stars
6
3 stars
5
2 stars
4
1 star
Share This!
  Ask friends for feedback
  • Great Product

    Rated a Somewhat Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Aug 31, 2012
    Pros: Zoom, Depth of Field, Price, Photo Quality, Video Quality
    Cons: Doesn't feel sturdy, 4.9 foot minimum macro

    Summary: I bought this lens about two months ago after using it over spring break in 2011. The zoom on the lens is very good quality for it's price, and the quality of depth of field in the resulting photos/videos looks beautiful. It has become one of my main ... read more

  • For the price, not a bad lens.

    Rated a Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Mar 28, 2008
    Pros: Light, Very inexpensive
    Cons: OK build quality, Somewhat soft images

    Summary: If you have a Canon Digital SLR, and just the kit lens that it came with, there is no doubt that you will sometime find yourself wishing that you had more zoom. Face it- That 18-55 that the camera came with just doesn't get you up close- where you really ... read more

  • Canon EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 III - Decent Starter Telephoto... But Not Much More Beyond That

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Jan 26, 2008
    Pros: Light-Weight; Inexpensive; Smooth Zoom
    Cons: Softness; Rotating Front Element; Cheap Build

    Summary: As I was looking into getting a nice mid-range telephoto lens for myself, I borrowed a low-end Canon EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 III lens. This is the lowest-end variant of Canon's consumer level 75-300mm market. The version I used was the non-USM variant. ... read more

  • The hidden gem of the Zuiko Digital line!

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Jul 17, 2006
    Pros: Excellent macro performance, very sharp, lightweight, inexpensive.
    Cons: Not weatherproofed. Maximal aperture is not extremely fast.

    Summary: Continuing my review series of Olympus Zuiko Digital lenses for the Four Thirds system digital cameras, I’ve chosen to review the ZD 35mm macro lens. This lens is part of the “budget” range of lenses, and is currently the only lens capable ... read more

  • Get the IS version if you can afford it--not the best of Canon's offerings

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Apr 7, 2005
    Pros: good zoom range, light
    Cons: slooowwwww (high max aperature), no IS system.

    Summary: I bought this lens at the same time I bought my digital rebel body because I wanted a somewhat long zoom for shooting the tigers at busch gardens (from several hundred feet up on the bridge). For what I wanted it for, 300mm just isn't quite enough even ... read more

  • A solid higher-end consumer lens

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Mar 9, 2005
    Pros: If you want a lightweight & effective 300mm lens, this is a great choice.
    Cons: Some reports of incompatibility with the 10D digital body.

    Summary: Its always hard to get the perfect lens. Especially if you don't want to spend a ton of money. In the "ton of money" catagory, you have Canon's "L" lens series. Generally, the prices start at $1000 and go up from there. Even if you do have the ... read more

  • Great consumer overall zoom lens.

    Rated a Somewhat Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Jul 28, 2004
    Pros: IS rocks. Great zoom, great over all lens, quick focus. Light weight
    Cons: Not a fast lens. but nothing else wrong with this lens at all.

    Summary: IS is a great help in slightly lower light situations. The IS is not a replacement for a fast lens as 1/30 or 1/60th when zoomed out still blurs or causes shake. I like this for a good, overall outdoor lens because it's small enough to fit in my ... read more

  • Reach out for a good shot . . .

    Rated a Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Jul 18, 2003
    Pros: excellent general range solid quality USM motor Canon brand
    Cons: poor AF in low light EXTREMELY slow (f/4.0-5.6) bulky, large, and heavy

    Summary: Well, what can I say about this lens? First of all, let me give a fair appraisal of the good poin ... read more

  • My only lens

    Rated a Somewhat Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Sep 5, 2002
    Pros: Large Range (75mm to 300mm), Image Stabilizer, Quick Auto Focus in good light.
    Cons: Bad Auto Focus in low light

    Summary: This is currently my only lens! It is a little bit big for taking close pictures (min focal length is about 5 ft). I think the only other lens I need is a short focal length lens (24mm to 50mm). The lens is physically large but works great! The ... read more

  • Great Lens for the Money

    Rated a Somewhat Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Feb 6, 2001
    Pros: IS works great - Improves ability to take hand-held shots several stops; Good sharpness!
    Cons: Heavy; Slightly dark colors at full zoom

    Summary: This lens is about the best you can do for the money without resorting to the heavy special glass professional lenses. It's bulky, but the Image Stabilization (IS) dramatically reduces blurryness due to shaking. It's worth lugging the extra weight of ... read more

  • A wildlife photographer's dream

    Rated a Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Sep 7, 2000
    Pros: stability, speed(IS off), versatility, price
    Cons: weight, decreased speed(IS on)

    Summary: History: I have always been fascinated shooting wildlife (animal and human) in their natural habitat (My favorite: a trip to Kruger National Park, South Africa). This sometimes requires an extremely steady hand and/or a really fast shutter ... read more

  • Canon Zoom Lens Perfect for Every Occasion – Even Portraits

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Sep 7, 2000
    Pros: Durable, Versatile, Fast Auto Focus, Superior Stabilization, Generally Lightweight
    Cons: Like all zoom lenses, this is not ideal for those real "close" shots - Use Your Point-n-Shoot at Gramma's 80th Birthday Bash

    Summary: If you haven’t heard, I like to take pictures. Let me rephrase that. I’m hopelessly, utterly, pathetically obsessed with photography. The addiction began when I was just a small child, who stole my parents’ camera and went hog-wild at the zoo. My ... read more

  • the inexpensive alternative

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Jul 2, 2000
    Pros: inexpensive, light
    Cons: soft, vignetting, poor construction, small aperture.

    Summary: The 75-300 does the job and that's all. It has no features that make you say WOW! Construction: poor... It has a "cheap" feeling. The rings are not tight, so the controls are not precise. You can hear some pieces ratteling when you ... read more

  • Canon 75-300 III USM: Inexpensive and handy!

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Jun 19, 2000
    Pros: Low price, nice lens range to have
    Cons: fairly high aperture (f/4-5.6)

    Summary: This lens was very cheap, and very nice addition to my gear. I bought the lens for a little under $200 through an internet retailer. The 75-300 range is very useful in many situations including close-ups and portraits. I want to stress ... read more

  • Expensive, yet still a bargain!

    Rated a Very Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Jun 12, 2000
    Pros: Image stabilization.
    Cons: Expensive

    Summary: This lens had barely hit the "streets" when I first tried to buy it. Advance publicity had made it such a hot item that it was unavailable for weeks. By that time cooler, more sensible minds had convinced me I shouldn't purchase it. I bought a ... read more

  • Buy with image stabilization, or buy a super-zoom

    Rated a Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    May 10, 2000
    Pros: Cheap
    Cons: Cheaply made

    Summary: I bought this lens when I was new to photography, and it was *not* a good choice. It was inexpensive, but it has some real drawbacks. It's cheaply made. The zoom creeps out when the camera points down. The front element rotates when focusing. Poor ... read more

  • Bringing the Action Up Close

    Rated a Helpful Review by the Epinions community
    Apr 28, 2000
    Pros: Inexpensive for its features, great value
    Cons: Autofocus motor is slow

    Summary: After purchasing the original Canon EOS Rebel second-hand few years ago, I realized that the 35-80mm lens that came with the camera did not have enough magnification to bring auto racing actions up close. So I decided to start shopping for a zoom lens. I ... read more

  • Express Reviews
  • Fair Value For The Price Range

    Rated Show by the Epinions community
    Dec 29, 2006
    Pros: A Good Every Day Lens For The Semi Pro
    Cons: Loose A Little Clarity With Fully Extended Zoom.

    Summary: This is a good quality family use lens. If photographing the kids on a swing, or the pooch chasing a stick, or even the deer snacking in your garden - you can capture life happening! This is a good walk around every day lens. At the 75mm range, the

  • Not Canon's best...but still a decent lens.

    Rated Show by the Epinions community
    Apr 22, 2004
    Pros: Affordable, adequately sharp
    Cons: Not "L-lens" sharp

    Summary: A couple of months ago, I bought a Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III lens for my Elan 7E to introduce myself to telephoto photography. Since then, I've taken hundreds of shots with this lens on both my Elan 7E and my Digital Rebel. (Don't forget to read my

  • Cheap zoom lens from canon

    Rated Show by the Epinions community
    Apr 16, 2004
    Pros: Zoom range and price
    Cons: Very slow, noisy, poor construction- lot's of plastic, rotating front element, soft at long range

    Summary: I bought this one used in like new condition from Bay. Slapped the lens to my Elan 7 body, and boy, this is slow. USM is not ring type, so it's very slow. If you want to save money get the one without USM. Picture quality is acceptable at 100-200mm

  • Lens reliability - possible design error?

    Rated Show by the Epinions community
    Mar 23, 2004
    Pros: Many features
    Cons: Reliability is not good

    Summary: Both my Cannon lenses suffered the following problem after 3 year of use: the zooming gets blocked, focusing does not always work. A screw fell out inside the lens, blocking mechanical elements. My lenses: Cannon EF 28-135 IS/USM Cannon EF 75-300

  • Good for the price.

    Rated Show by the Epinions community
    Sep 16, 2003
    Pros: - Good zoom range.
    - Good quality for price.
    Cons: - No image stabilization.
    - Poor auto focusing in low light conditions.

    Summary: This is a good quality, entry-level camera lens which provides a wide zoom range. I purchased it along with my EOS 10D, and after shelling out the $$$ for the camera, my budget limited me to lower-priced lenses to begin with. The lens has produced so

Showing 1-22 of 22 reviews


Where can I buy it?
Showing 1-4 of 75 deals
Fantastic prices with ease & c...
- Brand New 58mm Professional 0.43x Wide Angle Lens- Includes* Wide angle lens w/ macro* Front and back lens covers* Protective lens bag* Step-up/Step...
Amazon Marketplace
Store Rating: 2.5

Free Shipping
Earn 2% eBay Bucks on qualifyi...
Canon 75-300/4-5.6 EF III Zoom Lens IMP Canon 75-300/4-5.6 EF III Zoom Lens IMP SKU: 6473A003I Canon 75-300/4-5.6 EF III Zoom Lens IMP
eBay
Store Rating: 4.0
Free Shipping
Fantastic prices with ease & c...
Compact and lightweight 4x telephoto zoom lens ideal for shooting sports, portraits, and wildlife. The newly developed Micro USM makes autofocusing qu...
Amazon Marketplace
Store Rating: 2.5
Free Shipping
In Stock, Ships Today! FREE SH...
EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM Autofocus Lens, 75-300mm Telephone Zoom Lens
B&H Photo-Video-Pro Audio
Store Rating: 5.0
Free Shipping
View More Deals       Why are these stores listed?